
MLB Power Rankings: The 30 Teams on Offensive 'Clutchness' in the 2010 Season
Being able to perform in the 'clutch', when the game is on the line and there is no room for error, is a unique ability. Feeling 50,000+ pairs of eyes watching your every move and knowing millions more are watching on their TVs in their homes can be nerve-racking, to say the least.
Nonetheless, professional baseball players are often faced with a situation like this and how they perform in them can becoming a defining characteristic. A great baseball player can lose respect, and ultimately significant money in his contract, if he is known for not getting the big hit when needed; likewise, a player can prolong, or even make, a career out of timely hits.
Lenny Harris, for example was a career .269 hitter but he got the hits when it counted most. Over his 18 season career, much of which was either has a platoon player or pinch hitter, Harris batted .294 with tow outs and a runner on third; he also batted .323 with the bases loaded.
Individual clutch performances can greatly affect a player's career and it can also give his team an extra win or two but the combine clutch offensive performances of an entire team can have a huge impact on the team's season. A team with a lot of talent but who doesn't get the big hits often misses the playoffs whereas a team with less offensive talent but gets the big hit when it matters most can win the World Series (see the 2010 San Francisco Giants).
This slideshow is ranking the 30 MLB teams from least to most clutch, as a whole, for the 2010 season. In order to fully analyze the 'clutchness' of a team I used 8 different statistical categories.
This includes: WAR (wins above replacement), BT Wins (adjusted batting wins - which measures a hitter's contribution to his team's wins with only his bat), Clutch (which measures the win probability of a team having a particular player), Productive Outs Percentage (which measures a player's ability to make productive outs - i.e. moving a runner along, etc.), BA with Two Outs and RISP, BA in Late+Close games, BA in High Leverage Situations, and, finally, BA in Extra innings.
With this extensive list of stats of the entire teams combined offensive stats, I was able to fully analyze each team's ability to perform in the clutch and, thus, rank them from least to most clutch.
30. Seattle Mariners
1 of 30
The Good:
- The Mariners were almost in the top 3rd of baseball with their Clutch rating.
The Bad:
- The Mariners finished last in BT Wins and 2 Out W/RISP categories.
- The Mariners also finished 2nd to last in High Leverage and Extra Innings BA categories.
| WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. | |
| Mariners | 11.7 | -14.2 | -0.1 | 30 | .197 | .221 | .235 | .177 |
| MLB Rank | 23 | 30 | 11 | 20 | 30 | 28 | 29 | 29 |
29. Pittsburgh Pirates
2 of 30
The Good:
- The Pirates had a good Clutch rating in 2010.
The Bad:
- While a good Clutch rating is good, it doesn't account for everything; in all of the other categories the Pirates finished in the bottom 3rd of all 30 MLB teams (including a combined MLB worst in the WAR category).
| WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. | |
| Pirates | -4.4 | -13.6 | .8 | 28 | .225 | .236 | .243 | .224 |
| MLB Rank | 30 | 29 | 8 | 26 | 24 | 22 | 26 | 25 |
28. New York Mets
3 of 30
The Good:
- Productive Out % - The Mets were able to make productive outs and move runners along. While this is important because it sets up the ability to drive in runs the rest of the Mets' stats show they weren't able to do anything after advancing the runners.
The Bad:
- Finished in the bottom three in all of the important clutch Batting Average categories. You can't expect to win games when your offense is at its worst when it counts the most...
- With a payroll like the Mets had in 2010 one wouldn't normally expect them to appear this close to the bottom - Carlos Beltran, for example, received such a large salary off of what he did in the post season right before he became a free agent (he was clutch then...).
| WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. | |
| Mets | 17.4 | -7.7 | -3.8 | 37 | .208 | .212 | .227 | .185 |
| MLB Rank | 17 | 24 | 27 | 4 | 29 | 29 | 30 | 28 |
27. Los Angeles Angels Of Anaheim
4 of 30
The Good:
- Like the Mets, the Angels were excellent at giving themselves up when they had to advance a runner (Productive Out %)
- Compared to the other BA categories, the 2 Out, RISP BA was decent.
The Bad:
- Lowest BA in baseball in Late and Close games.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Angels | 10.8 | -6.3 | -3.6 | 37 | .238 | .202 | .244 | .226 |
| MLB Rank | 25 | 21 | 26 | 3 | 15 | 30 | 25 | 24 |
26. Chicago Cubs
5 of 30
The Good:
- The Cubs offense showed up in Extra Innings posting an almost .300 average when the game went past 9 innings.
The Bad:
- Last in the Clutch rating
- 3rd to last in the WAR rating
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Cubs | 6.1 | -11.1 | -5.7 | 30 | .240 | .237 | .246 | .297 |
| MLB Rank | 28 | 27 | 30 | 22 | 14 | 20 | 23 | 7 |
25. Toronto Blue Jays
6 of 30
The Good:
- BT Wins and WAR rating are very good.
The Bad:
- Productive Outs % is 3rd worst in the league. Not doing the small things makes it harder to drive in runs and, no doubt, negatively effected other clutch categories.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Blue Jays | 23.5 | 3.4 | -3 | 26 | .228 | .236 | .252 | .219 |
| MLB Rank | 9 | 7 | 25 | 28 | 22 | 21 | 16 | 26 |
24. Arizona Diamondbacks
7 of 30
The Good:
- Give the young age of the team the WAR and BT Wins category is good should only improve as their key players get more experience.
The Bad:
- Extremely poor ranking in the Clutch, Prod. Out %, and Late/Close categories.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Diamondbacks | 18.9 | -4.3 | -4.6 | 26 | .232 | .222 | .251 | .241 |
| MLB Rank | 15 | 17 | 29 | 29 | 19 | 27 | 18 | 20 |
23. Washington Nationals
8 of 30
The Good:
- Jayson Werth + experience for their young players = improvement in the numbers over the next few years.
The Bad:
- Worst team in baseball when it comes to Extra Inning batting average.
- One of the worst BAs in baseball in Late and Close games.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Nationals | 11.7 | -7.1 | -2.2 | 32 | .233 | .223 | .250 | .111 |
| MLB Rank | 24 | 22 | 19 | 14 | 17 | 26 | 19 | 30 |
22. Oakland Athletics
9 of 30
The Good:
- Productive Out %, Late and Close BA, and Extra Innings BA are respectable (especially given the team's W-L record).
The Bad:
- High Leverage situations were
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Athletics | 17.2 | -6 | -2.8 | 35 | .228 | .244 | .240 | .258 |
| MLB Rank | 19 | 20 | 22 | 10 | 21 | 13 | 27 | 15 |
21. Cleveland Indians
10 of 30
The Good:
- Really good 2 Out, RISP BA.
- WAR rating is solid.
The Bad:
- Late and Close was not a good situation for the Indians.
- Productive Outs % shows the team was not good at moving runners over, etc.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Indians | 21.9 | -1.2 | -2.9 | 29 | .243 | .233 | .248 | .264 |
| MLB Rank | 12 | 15 | 23 | 25 | 9 | 24 | 20 | 14 |
20. Baltimore Orioles
11 of 30
The Good:
- Best offensive team in baseball in Extra Innings with an astounding .353 BA!
- Late and Close games the Orioles were one of the better teams in baseball as far as BA goes.
- Solid rating in the Clutch and Productive Outs % categories
The Bad:
- WAR and 2 Out, RISP were poor ratings for the Orioles. Perhaps there would have been less Late and Close games or Extra Inning games if the Orioles performed better with 2 Out and RISP.
- High Leverage situations was a struggle for the Orioles' hitters.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Orioles | 9.5 | -8.2 | -.2 | 34 | .219 | .256 | .245 | .353 |
| MLB Rank | 27 | 25 | 12 | 12 | 26 | 7 | 24 | 1 |
19. Los Angeles Dodgers
12 of 30
The Good:
- Extra Innings is when the Dodgers offense showed up.
The Bad:
- Poor WAR rating
- Poor Late and Close BA
- Poor High Leverage BA
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Dodgers | 16.7 | -4.7 | -.7 | 31 | .232 | .230 | .248 | .292 |
| MLB Rank | 20 | 18 | 15 | 15 | 18 | 25 | 21 | 8 |
18. Florida Marlins
13 of 30
The Good:
- High Leverage BA
- Extra Inning BA
The Bad:
- WAR and BT Wins rating was very poor for the 2010 season.
- It's hard to win games if you don't get the big 2 out hit, and the Marlins had one of the worst BA in that situation.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Marlins | 10.5 | -8.5 | .3 | 30 | .220 | .249 | .266 | .290 |
| MLB Rank | 26 | 26 | 10 | 19 | 25 | 10 | 8 | 9 |
17. Milwaukee Brewers
14 of 30
The Good:
- BT Wins is extremely high = their hitters had a HUGE impact with their bats (with players like Ryan Braun and Prince Fielder it's easy to understand why that is)
- The Brewers were very successful at driving in runners with 2 outs
- Excellent BA in Extra Innings
The Bad:
- It's tough to see a team do so many things right (like getting the 2 out hit) but shoot themselves in the foot like not getting a bunt down. The Brewers were the worst in Productive Outs in baseball; and it hurts more that they are an NL team, where Productive outs mean more with the pitcher in the batting order.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Brewers | 23.4 | 3.9 | -2.5 | 25 | .252 | .240 | .237 | .313 |
| MLB Rank | 10 | 6 | 20 | 30 | 8 | 18 | 28 | 5 |
16. San Diego Padres
15 of 30
The Good:
- Clutch rating is great.
- The Padres helped their own cause by being able to handle the bat; Productive Outs % shows us they were one of the best in this.
The Bad:
- A .218 BA with 2 outs and RISP definitely contributed to their collapse at the end of the season.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Padres | 19.9 | -3.8 | 1 | 37 | .218 | .244 | .254 | .252 |
| MLB Rank | 13 | 16 | 7 | 2 | 27 | 14 | 15 | 17 |
15. New York Yankees
16 of 30
The Good:
- BT Wins: tells us the Yankees won their games in a slugfest and not a pitchers' duel, typically. And, with a number as high as that, a slugfest is what the Yankees wanted.
- Excellent WAR for the team.
The Bad:
- The Extra Innings BA is very subpar; especially for a team made up of the caliber of talent the Yankees had.
- Late and Close BA is middle of the pack but, for a payroll like the Yankees have, it should be higher. With all those All-Stars they should be getting bigger hits more often.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Yankees | 26.8 | 7.3 | -3 | 31 | .242 | .241 | .255 | .235 |
| MLB Rank | 4 | 1 | 24 | 16 | 11 | 16 | 14 | 22 |
14. Kansas City Royals
17 of 30
The Good:
- The Royals were actually a pretty decent team in offensively clutch situations; considering their record they had some of the best BAs for 2 out and RISP and Late and Close.
- The Royals showed they could play small ball and do the little things to win games with a solid Productive Out % in 2010.
The Bad:
- The Clutch category comes up a bit low.
- WAR is also low (this is most likely a byproduct of not having a bit name on the team to raise the team's average - nothing against Billy Butler, he's very good, but he's not a top 10 player in the MLB).
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Royals | 17.2 | -.3 | -2.7 | 35 | .259 | .259 | .260 | .286 |
| MLB Rank | 18 | 12 | 21 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 10 |
13. Detroit Tigers
18 of 30
The Good:
- Late and Close BA! That goes a long way to seeing the numbers in the win column rise.
- Excellent team WAR and BT Wins
- Almost in the top 3rd of the High Leverage BA in baseball
The Bad:
- Productive Out % - again hurting your own cause when you can't do the small things to help you win a game.
- 2 Out, RISP BA - so the Tigers were able to get a lot of hits but when there were 'ducks on the pond' with 2 outs they were one of the worst hitting teams. It's hard enough to score runs with only 3 outs; helping the defense and essentially making them only get 2 outs doesn't help you to win games.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Tigers | 24.3 | 2.2 | -.4 | 30 | .226 | .274 | .260 | .252 |
| MLB Rank | 6 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 23 | 1 | 11 | 16 |
12. Houston Astros
19 of 30
The Good:
- Clutch rating!
- High Leverage situations seem to be a situation the Astros thrived in (when compared to the rest of the MLB).
- Productive Outs % is extremely high. This is really important for an NL team.
The Bad:
- BT Wins shows the Astros' players had trouble winning games with their bats alone.
- Extra Innings BA could be improved.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Astros | 3.4 | -13.3 | 8.1 | 35 | .242 | .241 | .247 | .281 |
| MLB Rank | 29 | 28 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 15 | 4 | 18 |
11. Atlanta Braves
20 of 30
The Good:
- WAR, BT Wins and Clutch ratings are all excellent.
The Bad:
- I'm surprised to see a Bobby Cox-managed team with such a poor Productive Outs %. I would have thought a manager like Cox would have stressed getting the little things done correctly.
- Poor High Leverage BA suggests a possible source for the struggles the Braves faced at the end of the season trying to make it into the playoffs.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Braves | 25 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 29 | .242 | .241 | .247 | .281 |
| MLB Rank | 5 | 9 | 4 | 24 | 12 | 17 | 22 | 11 |
10. Colorado Rockies
21 of 30
The Good:
- Clutch rating!
- High Leverage situations = the Rockies were one of the best team in baseball in them.
The Bad:
- WAR, BT Wins, Productive Outs %, and Extra Innings BA. What happened? I was surprised by this because the Rockies are known for the September power surges and push for the playoffs. They came up short in 2010 but still had a great run (especially Tulo). How bad would their numbers have been if they had a normal September month?
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Rockies | 13.8 | -7.2 | 2.7 | 30 | .240 | .248 | .269 | .248 |
| MLB Rank | 22 | 23 | 2 | 18 | 13 | 12 | 7 | 19 |
9. Boston Red Sox
22 of 30
The Good:
- WAR, BT Wins, and Late and Close BA! All categories the Red Sox are top 3 in baseball! That'll help you win games
- 2 Out and RISP the Red Sox come in at number 5; not top 3 but still really, really good.
The Bad:
- Productive Outs %. Again, I'm really surprised to see such a well-managed team, with such a high caliber of talent, failing to do the small things to help them win games.
- Extra Innings BA - what happened here? Did the players get tired? They went from being one of the best teams in Late and Close games to one of the worst once the scoreboard showed a double-digit inning. Had they performed better in Extra Innings how many more wins would they have had? Would it have been a true three team race in the AL east in 2010?
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Red Sox | 28.5 | 6.4 | -.8 | 26 | .266 | .262 | .251 | .218 |
| MLB Rank | 2 | 2 | 16 | 27 | 5 | 3 | 17 | 27 |
8. St. Louis Cardinals
23 of 30
The Good:
- Lots to be happy about here: WAR, Productive Outs %, 2 Out and RISP, Late and Close, and High Leverage BA. All top 10 in baseball.
The Bad:
- Same story as the Red Sox; what happened in Extra Innings? Why did the team go from doing so well at the end of close games to so poorly on the offensive side of the game? And how many wins did it cost them? That's one way to top off a frustrating season.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Cardinals | 23.6 | 0 | -1.6 | 36 | .255 | .256 | .265 | .230 |
| MLB Rank | 8 | 11 | 18 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 23 |
7. Tampa Bay Rays
24 of 30
The Good:
- WAR, BT Wins, Clutch, and High Leverage BA are all top 5 in baseball!
The Bad:
- 2 Outs and RISP was a problem for the Rays.
- Extra Innings was not the best time for the Rays offense.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Rays | 28 | 4.2 | 1.1 | 34 | .230 | .238 | .272 | .240 |
| MLB Rank | 3 | 5 | 5 | 11 | 20 | 19 | 5 | 21 |
6. Philadelphia Phillies
25 of 30
The Good:
- WAR is very good.
- Extra Innings BA is superb; almost .300.
- Clutch rating is 3rd best in baseball for the 2010 season.
The Bad:
- Productive Outs % is very poor (especially for a team that does so well with other fundamentals of the game).
- Late and Close BA is extremely low - particularly with the talent this team had. Bad Late and Close BA + Giants solid bullpen + Giants early lead = Trouble for the Phillies
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Phillies | 24 | -.9 | 2 | 29 | .237 | .235 | .262 | .298 |
| MLB Rank | 7 | 13 | 3 | 23 | 16 | 23 | 10 | 6 |
5. Texas Rangers
26 of 30
The Good:
- Productive Outs %! Best in baseball; and definitely a surprise as I took the Rangers for more of a free-swinging team. Goes to show the affect of giving yourself up to move a runner along can have (they made it to the World Series, after all).
- 2 Out RISP! Again, the best in baseball in 2010. Without a doubt that played a really big role to all their success in 2010. It's so important to get those 2 out RBIs (and not to mention it really deflates the opposing team).
- High Leverage BA is superb. The got the hits when they needed to AND when the hits would count for the most.
The Bad:
- Clutch rating is a bit low, which was a surprise.
- WAR was also lower than I expected (especially with all the superstars this team had).
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Rangers | 18.7 | .6 | -1.1 | 38 | .285 | .248 | .281 | .271 |
| MLB Rank | 16 | 10 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 3 | 13 |
4. San Francisco Giants
27 of 30
The Good:
- The epitome of why quality beats quantity: the Giants didn't get a lot of hits but they maximized the damage when they did get them. 2nd best in baseball in Extra Inning BA and 5th best in Late and Close BA.
- Solid Productive Outs %
- Although the numbers could be better, it's hard to argue with results. The Giants won the World Series and had some extremely timely hits in the process (Cody Ross, Edgar Renteria, Juan Uribe, etc.).
The Bad:
- 2 Outs and RISP is 3rd worst in baseball! Hard to believe a team can win the World Series while being so poor at getting in a run when there are 2 outs in the inning. But it does go along with the theme of Giants baseball - the pitchers got whatever runs the offense could scrape together and that's all the SF pitchers had to work with; it turns out that they didn't give up many runs so the offensive didn't need to score many.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Giants | 19.6 | -4.8 | -.6 | 35 | .212 | .258 | .256 | .329 |
| MLB Rank | 14 | 19 | 14 | 8 | 28 | 5 | 13 | 2 |
3. Cincinnati Reds
28 of 30
The Good:
- WAR rating! Best in baseball in 2010!
- BT Wins rating! 3rd best in baseball in 2010.
- BAs for 2 Out and RISP, Late and Close, High Leverage, and Extra Innings are all fantastic. Constantly in the top of baseball in all 4 categories - that's a recipe for success!
The Bad:
- Clutch rating is suspiciously low. 3rd lowest in baseball.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Reds | 29.6 | 6.3 | -4.1 | 31 | .269 | .272 | .270 | .321 |
| MLB Rank | 1 | 3 | 28 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 3 |
2. Chicago White Sox
29 of 30
The Good:
- Minus WAR and BT Wins all of the numbers in the categories are excellent. The White Sox got it done with men in scoring position and 2 out; they were also very successful in High Leverage situations and had a lot of success in Extra Innings.
- Productive Outs % is excellent - especially for an AL team.
The Bad:
- WAR rating is very low given the talent on this club.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| White Sox | 14.6 | -1 | .3 | 35 | .273 | .249 | .281 | .320 |
| MLB Rank | 21 | 14 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 4 |
1. Minnesota Twins
30 of 30
The Good:
- Best High Leverage BA in baseball in 2010!
- Second best BA wtih 2 outs and RISP in baseball!
- BT Wins very high shows the Twins offense helped get a lot of wins for the club.
- Excellent Clutch rating.
- Really good BA in Late and Close games and it essentially continued into Extra Innings (as far as the rankings among other MLB teams go; in terms of BA comparison the BA was actually higher in Extra Innings but this is probably because the better relievers were used up by then - probably in those Late and Close innings were the BA is lower).
The Bad:
- Nothing to say here...that's why they are the most clutch offensive team in the 2010 season.
| Team | WAR | BT Wins | Clutch | Prod. Out % | 2 Out, RISP | Late/Close | High Leverage | Extra Inn. |
| Twins | 22 | 4.9 | 1 | 32 | .277 | .252 | .291 | .276 |
| MLB Rank | 11 | 4 | 6 | 13 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 12 |

.png)




.jpg)







