Los Angeles Rams logoLos Angeles Rams

Will Sam Bradford's Contract Be Cheaper Than Matt Stafford's?

NEW YORK - APRIL 22:  Quarterback Sam Bradford (R) from the Oklahoma Sooners poses with NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell as they hold up a St. Louis Rams jersey after the Rams selected Bradford numer 1 overall during the first round of the 2010 NFL Draft at Radio City Music Hall on April 22, 2010 in New York City.  (Photo by Jeff Zelevansky/Getty Images)
Jeff Zelevansky/Getty Images
Imtiaz FerdousCorrespondent IIJuly 29, 2010

The No. 1 overall pick in this year's NFL entry draft (along with a lot of other first-round picks) has not been signed, yet. Nobody knows why. After all most teams agree to terms with the first overall pick in a draft before drafting him. It seems like the logical thing to do, and I support it, but the Rams may have a very good reason to not sign him quickly.

The NFL is entering the final year of its CBA, and right now one of the major issues the NFL has with the NFLPA is that the rookies are making so much money. Matt Stafford already makes as much as some of the richest quarterbacks in the NFL.

The NFL has argued the NFLPA cannot contest this as the draft picks are not yet part of the NFLPA, which means the NFLPA should not represent them. I think this is wrong because the moment you are signed, you are a member of the NFLPA. So this process affects future NFLPA members and so they should be fighting for their rights.

Even with that argument I don't think anyone can defend the outrageous salaries rookies seem to be getting these days. Matt Ryan makes $12 million per year, but then again Jamarcus Russell made a tonne, too. Most quarterbacks in the NFL (like Tom Brady) don't make that much on a per year basis.

Tom Brady only makes $10 million per year on average, and he has three Super Bowl rings. Compare that with the $12-$13 million per year rookie quarterbacks seem to make these days. They are unproven commodities and should be paid far less than a superstar like Brady.

So with all these arguments I think it is safe to say in the next labour negotiations, the NFL should be able to shrink the rookie salaries to far lower levels like $1 million per year. This way teams will not be set back for years with one awful draft pick (which happens even to the best of general managers). 

So what does this have to do with all the rookies in this year's draft? Well it gives the negotiating team far more leverage than they've ever had before. Suppose the Rams said to Bradford they'll pay him $6 million per year for six years, Bradford and his camp would laugh. Then the team points out with the rookie salary cap about to be pulled out in the new CBA if he enters next year's draft he will be lucky to get $6 million per year, and suddenly $6 million does not sound so bad. 

However, these players will not give it up so easily. They have been raised in the time where NFL teams paid insane amounts of money to high draft picks. This may be why so few first-round picks have signed. After all the primary source of leverage the rookies had was that they would re-enter the draft the following year, but now that threat is gone. We could finally see the power in the NFL draft picks contract negotiations shift from the rookie to the team.

Where can I comment?

Stay on your game

Latest news, insights, and forecasts on your teams across leagues.

Choose Teams
Get it on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Real-time news for your teams right on your mobile device.

Download
Copyright © 2017 Bleacher Report, Inc. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved. BleacherReport.com is part of Bleacher Report – Turner Sports Network, part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Network. Certain photos copyright © 2017 Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited. AdChoices