Mikel Leshoure: Fantasy Owners Should Temper Expectations for Lions RB
Of course they should. But I wouldn't get too excited, either.
If he's available in your league and you need some depth at running back, he's a good pick-up, especially when you consider the Lions intend to involve him in the game plan immediately in Week 3. From Tim Twentyman of DetroitLions.com:
"He hasn’t really played in a real game since he was in college where he had to play four quarters,” [offensive coordinator Scott] Linehan said. “It will be fun to see him get back out there and be the fresh legs guy in the group and we’ll go.”
Linehan said he expects Leshoure to be involved heavily in the game plan for Titans this week. Through their first two games, Tennessee (0-2) is allowing 155 yards per game on the ground and ranks 30th in the league against the run.
“We’ll see how much he’s ready to go in this game but he’ll certainly be involved heavily in the game plan and we’ll go from there,” Linehan said. “We’ve always felt like he was going to be a big boost for us once he came back in the lineup."
Smith is also a far better option in the passing game, meaning Leshoure's role will be limited to two downs. On a Lions team that is smitten with the passing attack, the ability to catch the ball out of the backfield is more valuable in Detroit than simply being proficient running between the tackles.
Sure, Leshoure may be the starter before too long, but with Smith available, Joique Bell seeing his role expand and the possibility that Jahvid Best might play at some point this season, how valuable will he really be for fantasy owners even if he does start?
Mikel Leshoure will be...
So sure, go ahead and add Leshoure to your fantasy team if you need running back depth. Just know that he's a stash-play out of the gate, and might prove to remain that way unless he can differentiate himself from the other Detroit backs and put up big numbers.
I'm not counting on it.
But I'm not ruling out the possibility that he'll have fantasy relevance this season either.
Hit me up on Twitter—my tweets are still in the Heisman race.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?