The Cardinals made a big splash in Saturday's draft by selecting behemoth offensive tackle Levi Brown. Here, Jeff Gollin from The Big Red Sheet Cardinals blog breaks down the draft for the Bleacher Report.
In part two of his analysis, Gollin dissects Levi Brown's skills and shortcomings, in addition to evaluating the Cardinals' four other picks in the 2007 NFL draft.
LEVI BROWN, OT, PENN STATE
Buzz out of Cardinal Country was that offensive line coach Russ Grimm (who worked Levi out individually during his Pro Day) liked him better than Joe Thomas (whom many observers rated higher).
I'd prefer to rate one tackle 1a and the other 1b. Thomas was considered the better pass blocker and the "safer" prospect. Brown was considered the more physical run blocker with more athleticism and a greater upside, but with a slightly less consistent motor.
For many years, the Cardinals have had problems running the football (until the arrival of Edgerrin James, the last Arizona RB to run for more than 1,000 yards in a season was Adrian Murrell). While the Cardinal rushing attack approached respectability in the latter half of last season, there is room for considerable improvement. Add to this the departure of Leonard Davis to the
Cowboys and it became growingly evident that Levi Brown fit the job description to a tee.
ALAN BRANCH, DT, MICHIGAN
You can't watch his highlight reel without getting excited. Alan takes up considerable space; I've seen him completely dominate the line of scrimmage. He can defeat the double team and frequently occupies two blockers. (One reason LB David Harris performed so well for the Wolverines was that Branch was keeping blockers from getting to the second level.)
Branch's draft stock was hurt by the fact that his production fell off at the end of in his final college season—he would disappear on occasion or wear down in games, and was recovering from stress fractures in both legs. Originally a Top 10 (and even possibly a Top 5) value on many draft boards, it was inevitable that he'd slip a little on Saturday—but I don't think anyone felt he'd fall all the way to the second round.
Was Branch's "underachiever" rap deserved?
Not if you pay attention to SIRIUS Radio's Pat Kirwin (who spent roughly 15 minutes railing at 25-year-old kids who never coached a game— basing their opinions more on hearsay than on miles of game tape). Kirwin pointed out that nose tackles are particularly susceptible to defensive schemes and responsibilities (i.e. stay at home; protect against backside cutbacks) which causes them to "disappear" on highlight tapes unless you know what to look for.
Pat asked USC Coach Pete Carroll and his center Ryan Kalil about their impressions of Branch. They said Branch was the toughest inside force they ever had to face and felt his consistency was just fine. Kirwin then went one step farther and interviewed Alan on the air.
He asked Branch, "How much of the time were you asked to play backside contain against cutbacks?"
Alan's solemn answer: "A whole lot."
If the Cardinal coaches can get Branch to bring his "A" game on every snap, opposing teams will think twice between even thinking about running between the tackles. Given his potential to totally transform the dynamic of a defense, the question wasn't whether the Cardinals should risk a second round pick on Branch (and even trade up to get him); it was "how could you pass him up?"
BUSTER DAVIS, ILB, FLORIDA STATE
Think of Buster as Fred Willis—only an inch shorter and 0.06 seconds slower. He is a tackling machine who flies around the field hitting people and making plays. He's smart, with a quick first step, and is great at stuffing the run. He can cover too.
As one guy said on the teevee: "What Davis is is a football player". His value in the draft undoubtedly suffered because 5'9" is not the prototypical height for a middle linebacker. (Tell that to London Fletcher, Sam Mills, or Zach Thomas!)
3 Comments
Loading more comments...
This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete