World Football: How Barcelona Have Revolutionized Football Tactics
Shaun Botterill/Getty Images
Tactics are crucial to the game of football.
As in any sport, they determine strategy and prevent on-field chaos.
The developments in sports science and a deeper understanding of the game over time has forced tacticians to move with the times and create new methods in the way we play the game, just to keep up.
The game has reached a point of universality, where players are forced to adapt to a more expansive way of playing.
The history of the English game is associated with physicality, classically demonstrated in a rigid 4-4-2 formation that assigns each player a certain role to play in the game.
Defenders would traditionally consist of fullbacks and centre-backs. Midfielders would consist of wingers, holding midfielders, creative midfielders and so forth.
The game has moved on from specialised positional roles and formed a sport based around the ability to adapt to certain situations with players being able to contribute to all aspects of play, either in an attacking or defensive sense.
The perfect example of this evolution in football tactics is the dominant force in club football right now, Barcelona.
They are the pioneers of the perfect model of a 4-3-3 formation, defined by passing and positional play.
We will start with the attack—usually the combined trio of Lionel Messi, David Villa and Pedro.
Not one of these players spends the whole 90 minutes in a certain position on the field, as Messi will often start out wide on the right but will regularly drift more central and swap positions with Villa, for example.
This gives the opposition more to think and allows Barcelona to create opportunities through intricate passing and movement, allowing Messi more creative freedom in a match.
Ibrahimovich’s replacement was, of course, David Villa. It is his efficiency at cutting in from the left or right as a drifting forward that makes him a perfect fit in this attack.
Xavi and Iniesta are the heartbeat of the side.
They dictate the creative aspect of the game but also press high up the pitch in order to sustain that positional balance high in the opposition's half, allowing the attackers to create regular goal scoring opportunities.
These two midfielders create the play as a pair, rather than relying on one playmaker to hold a high position and dictate the tempo.
This is a role more suited with the old-style playmaker such as Riquelme or Rivaldo, as these sorts of attacking midfielders meant team performance in a match would lie heavily on their contribution to the game.
These sorts of play-makers do not have as much involvement in the game as the modern play-maker. They sit higher up the field and only contribute to the offensive aspect of the game.
This problem was demonstrated perfectly by Brazil’s dreadful performance in the 2011 Copa America.
Brazil played poorly and created few clear-cut chances due to their reliance on the performance of Ganso, who put in lacklustre displays in the hole between midfield and attack, a role associated with old-style playmakers such as Riquelme.
It is not to say that Ganso isn't good; he is brilliant on his day. But the performance of the team relies too heavily on his creative input.
Modern football calls for a player willing to act as a box-to-box, ball-winning play-maker, and that is exactly what Xavi and Iniesta do.
The new style of midfielder is a pure footballer, a more expansive one who can get from box to box—reminiscent of Roy Keane—but who possesses the vision and passing distribution of Paul Scholes at the same time.
It is also important to point out the contribution of Sergio Busquets in the Barcelona team.
The supposed "holding" midfielder contributes a great deal more than just protecting the back four.
The 22-year-old acts as the starting point in the three man midfield diamond, distributing the ball to the naturally more creative midfielders. He plays a whole new role in the game than that of a classic holding midfielder such as Claude Makelele, who broke up play but played little role in the fluidity of the passing movement.
The midfield and attack are the creative force behind Guardiola’s Barcelona, which perfectly outline the future of the tactical game, but the defence also play a key role in this adaptability.
For starters, fullbacks were gradually becoming wing-backs at the bigger clubs, due to their contribution in attacking play.
With Dani Alves it seems as though he is almost a right-winger at times. The Brazilian’s ability to control the whole right flank gives the attackers the opportunity press more narrowly and outnumber the middle of the park as well as provide width.
This adaptation of the right back brings a new dimension to the role, as attacking prowess is becoming a key attribute in their play.
Unlike fullbacks, centre-backs are associated with warrior-like figures, such as Nemanja Vidic and Carles Puyol.
But it is noticeable that their partners in defence—Rio Ferdinand and Gerard Pique respectively—are both players with considerable ability on the ball who like to come forward and distribute play.
This gives the team the opportunity to bridge the gap between midfield and defence by playing their way from the back. The defensive partnerships are not forged by accident but are derived from the footballing philosophies of their respected managers.
Both Sir Alex Ferguson and Pep Guardiola are innovators in the tactical world of football, and it is no surprise that they are the mega managers in the world right now.
The future of the game is being conjured by this modern wonder-team of Barcelona and their concentration on footballers actually being pure footballers rather than just a right-winger (for example).
The game needs to be played in a more fluid fashion, and although a physical and rigid 4-4-2 might be effective for a team like Stoke City, at the highest level of the game it is just becoming too predictable.
This future of the tactical game may ensure that players work harder to press the ball and constantly create movement for their fellow teammates, but it also means that teams like Barcelona will have more freedom for players to roam from positions and create the play as they see fit.
The game is evolving and the new breed of players are, too.
They must be able to adapt to the match situations and be more tactically aware on the field, rather than just sticking to their position and basic positional roles.
This revelation at Barcelona is the benchmark for all teams and is the definition of a team game, a team game largely controlled by tactics and the ability to be more expansive in their play.
That is what the future holds for football.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?