Fulham Defeats Fulham in Steven Gerrard's 'Triumphant' Return For Liverpool FC
Liverpool FC's defeat of Fulham this Wednesday is being hailed as a turning point in the Merseyside men's 2010-11 campaign. Two wins in a row! Eureka! Dalglish is brilliant as ever! The game also saw the supposedly triumphant return of Steven Gerrard, certainly one of the best midfielders of his generation. Yet Liverpool didnโt as much beat Fulham as it did stand by and watch Fulham beat itself.
The 1-0 decision on Wednesday came down to Fulham right back John Pantsilโs own goal, a botched attempt to clear a Torres strike rebounding from the post. Had Pantsil not miscalculated his kick, it seems unlikely that Liverpool would have come away with the win.
Despite a spirited 3-0 thumping of Wolverhampton four days earlier, the Merseyside men lacked drive, clarity and cohesion against Fulham. They were a far cry from Dalglishโs โ86 side, which thrashed Fulham 10-0 in that season.
After the match, Gerrard, whose return was nothing short of dull, was quoted as saying: โSeventh's not acceptable at this club.โ Certainly a bold statement, and considering the history of Liverpool FC, thereโs some truth to it.
What Gerrard failed to realizeโand what many have trouble coming to terms withโis that the current Liverpool side, and โthe clubโ as a historical, cultural and financial entity, are far from the same thing.
Regardless of what is and isnโt acceptable for Liverpool FC as a club, the current Liverpool team is lucky to be in contention for a place in Europe next year. Were it not for a handful of truly terrible teamsโWigan, Wolves, Villa before the arrival of Bentโand a number of others that are struggling significantlyโWest Ham, Birmingham, West Brom, Fulham, EvertonโLiverpool would be sitting much lower in the EPL table than it currently is.
Aside from the spirited attempts of Torres, Meireles and ล krte, an occasional burst of brilliance from Gerrard and genuinely fine play from Carragher before his injury, the Liverpool of the 2010-11 EPL season is a shambolic side. The idea of blaming Roy Hodgson for the sub-par performances of his players, especially in light of their continued under-performance under Daglish, is absurd. Liverpool is simply not that good a team.
Case in point: a side with one of the best strikers in EuropeโTorresโand two world-class midfieldersโGerrard and Mereilesโcan only beat a squad struggling to avoid relegation through the fateful gift of an own goal.
Were it not for the valiant efforts of Fulhamโs impressively in-form American midfielder Clint Dempsey, Fulham would undoubtedly be in the thick of the relegation herd. A team with players as talented as Liverpool's shouldn't struggle to defeat a side like Fulham, but there it is. The only logical conclusion is this: the Merseyside squad is less than the sum of its parts. Significantly less.
Some indirect attempts to acknowledge this deficiency have been made on the part of the Liverpool FC organizationโrumors connecting them with Charlie Adam, Dempsey and Uruguayan goal machine Luis Suรกrez are abundant during this transfer window. Such a transfer is surely a bold step in the right direction.
Ultimately, King Kenny canโt be blamed for Liverpoolโs losses, but can he really take the credit for their back-to-back wins? Gerrard may declare that seventh isnโt good enough until heโs blue in the face, but if Liverpool want better, theyโll have to earn it. Nothing is given in the EPL, especially in a league stacked with young, impressive sides like Arsenal and Totteham.

.png)









.jpg)
