A-Rod's “Performance Incentive” or “Marketing Incentive”
TOP NEWS

Assessing Every MLB Team's Development System ⚾
.png)
10 Scorching MLB Takes 🌶️

Yankees Call Up 6'7" Prospect 📈
The fig leaf MLB is using to justify the ARod provision is that it is a "marketing" provision. The Yankees, when they signed the deal, intended to market the daylights out of A-Rod’s chase of the HR record, and this provision give A-Rod a cut of that. As Stark’s article points out, that is a pretty thin reed on which to rest the weight of A-Rod’s contract.
Now, the issue is just how much A-Rod’ s chase of the HR record is worth in marketing to the Yankees, now that A-Rod is a known steroid-abuser. Obviously, a lot less than at the time that the deal was struck.
Some suggest that the Yankees simply refuse to pay the bonuses even if A-Rod reaches the marks and force A-Rod to sue to enforce the potentially unenforceable provision. I doubt that the Yankees will do so unless A-Rod’s performance has fallen so dramatically that his main value to the Yankees is as a potential HR record setter.
Also, it does not surprise me that the Yankees, as baseball’s wealthiest and most powerful team, and A-Rod as baseball’s biggest star (at least until just recently), get to play by their own rules. When Michael Jordan was playing, the NBA and their players union agreed on a deal that basically applied a salary cap to every player in the league except Jordan.
Also, I really don’t feel too bad about any deal which requires the Yankees to pay out even more money to an aging star. The Yankees’ profligacy when it comes to free agent contracts is essentially all that keeps the Yankees from being a lock on the post-season (at the very least) every single year.



.jpg)







