CFB
HomeScoresRecruitingHighlights
Featured Video
Ohtani Little League HR 😨

College Football: Auburn Falls To No. 2, So Who's the New No. 1?

Bobby SteeleNov 1, 2010

Another crazy week in college football!  An interesting idea was passed along to me recently and that was to take the average score instead of the cumulative score.  This results in teams not having an advantage for playing more games than another.  Being that it is an easy change, I put it in this week!  I think the results are better overall, tell me what you think!

 

Team 

W-L

Last Week

Last Game

Quality Wins

Losses

25.

South Carolina

6-2

20

W vs. Tennessee

None

@Kentucky

@Auburn

24.

North Carolina State

6-2

--

W vs. Florida State

@Georgia Tech

@Virginia Tech

@East Carolina

23.

Texas

4-4

15

L vs. Baylor

@Nebraska

UCLA

Iowa St Oklahoma (N)

Baylor

22.

USC

5-3

22

L vs. Oregon

@Hawaii

Washington

@Stanford

Oregon

21.

Ohio St

8-1

14

W @ Minnesota

@Illinois

@Wisconsin

20.

Baylor

7-2

23

W @ Texas

None

@Texas Tech @TCU

19.

Arizona

7-1

--

W @ UCLA

None

Oregon St

18.

Michigan St

8-1

6

L @ Iowa

None

@Iowa

17.

Arkansas

6-2

13

W vs. Vanderbilt

@Georgia @Texas A&M

Alabama, @Auburn

16.

Stanford

7-1

21

W @ Washington

@Washington

@Oregon

15.

Oklahoma

6-1

12

W vs. Colorado

None

@Missouri

14.

Hawaii

7-2

5

W @ Idaho

@Army

USC @Colorado

13.

Utah

8-0

19

W @ Air Force

@Iowa St

None

12.

Mississippi State

7-2

10

W vs. Kentucky

@Florida

Auburn

@LSU

11.

TCU

9-0

11

W @ UNLV

None

None

10.

Oregon St

4-3

--

W vs. Cal

@Arizona

@TCU

@Boise St

@Washington

9.

Alabama

7-1

8

BYE

@Arkansas

@South Carolina

8.

Wisconsin

7-1

7

BYE

@Iowa

@Michigan St

7.

Oklahoma State

7-1

16

W @ Kansas State

@Kansas St

Nebraska

6.

LSU

7-1

3

BYE

@Florida

@Auburn

5.

Boise St

7-0

9

W vs. Louisiana Tech

@Virginia Tech

None

4.

Missouri

7-1

4

L @ Nebraska

@Texas A&M Oklahoma

@Nebraska

3.

Oregon

8-0

17

W @ USC

@Arizona St

@USC

None

2.

Auburn

8-0

1

W @ Mississippi

@Mississippi State

None

1.

Nebraska

7-1

2

W vs. Missouri

@Washington

@Kansas St

@Oklahoma State

Missouri

Texas

TOP NEWS

Colts Jaguars Football
With Jayson Tatum sidelined, Celtics' fourth-quarter comeback falls short in Game 7 loss to 76ers

My college football playoff preference:

The detractors of a playoff indicate that the reasons they don’t like a playoff is that there would be too many games included in the season, and it would be hard to transport as many people as would be needed to each and every neutral site game.  So to solve this, the playoff needs to let a minimum number of teams in as possible, and only have a few of the games be at a neutral site game. My thoughts are: Make it like the NIT tournament, each of the higher seeded teams get home games until the final four.  Also, in order to give everyone a chance, have only conference champions invited.  That gives us 11 teams, and in order to make it an even number, I’m okay with one “wild card”.  I’ve been told that a lot of people want 16.  So given that, let’s take the Current Standings and choose our 16 schools.

 ACC—Virginia Tech

Big XII—Baylor

Big East—Pittsburgh

Big Ten—Michigan St

C-USA—UCF 

MAC—Northern Illinois

MWC—TCU

Pac-10—Oregon

SEC—Auburn

Sun Belt—Troy

WAC—Hawaii

Wild Card—Boise St

Wild Card—Utah

Wild Card—Alabama

Wild Card—Nebraska

Wild Card—Oklahoma

 Taking these 16 schools, I’d then seed them by conference strength.

  1. Baylor
  2. Auburn
  3. Oregon
  4. Michigan St
  5. Virginia Tech
  6. Hawaii
  7. TCU
  8. UCF
  9. Pittsburgh
  10. Troy
  11. Northern Illinois
  12. Boise St
  13. Utah
  14. Alabama
  15. Nebraska
  16. Oklahoma

In this scenario, the first round of games would be (I have road teams winning in bold):

Oklahoma

Baylor

Nebraska

Auburn

Alabama

Oregon

Utah

Michigan St

Boise St

Virginia Tech

Northern Illinois

Hawaii

Troy

TCU

Pittsburgh

UCF

 I’d take the worst teams and send them the best teams like the NFL.  The next round (again winning road teams in bold):

Boise St

Baylor

UCF

Auburn

TCU

Oregon

Hawaii

Michigan St

That would leave us with a Final Four Saturday-Sunday Contests in a Neutral Site to be: 

Boise St

Auburn

Michigan St

Oregon

With a Final of:

Oregon

Auburn

Playoff Dreams are fun, too bad you have to wake up.

Predictions for Week 10

Locks (3-0)

Auburn over Chattanooga

Michigan St over Minnesota

Wisconsin over Purdue

Great Games (Average Margin of Victor out of 4 games: 9)

Georgia Tech @ Virginia Tech

TCU @ Utah

Arkansas @ South Carolina

Upsets (if any) (1-1)

Georgia Tech over Virginia Tech

Utah over TCU

LSU over Alabama 

How the SRS is created:

First, the easy one: The whole point of me starting a ranking system 15 years ago was to remove any and all bias (that’s what they all say). The only teams I might have any sort of bias towards are the small Boise States of the world (no, I don’t have them No. 1) or my favorite team, Fresno State (not ranked). 

I’ve tried to come up with the rationale that every sports announcer I’ve ever heard brings up: Conference rankings (check), Road vs. Away (check), and who did you play (double-check).

As I said before, I’ve been doing this privately for over 15 years, and every year there have been slight changes to it. Usually by the end of the season, I see more improvements I can make, and I do that for the following season. By no stretch is it perfect, but I think it’s getting there.

So what are the specifics? It starts by generating a ranking for each conference. This is done by generating a win-loss record for each conference against the other conferences. For the purpose of this system, I consider each division a conference (for example, the SEC West is a conference—so are the independents).

This is modified by determining who those wins are against. For example, the Big Ten loses some of its power by scheduling lots of MAC teams. I take the total and divide it by how many teams are in the conference to normalize the value, and then take a ranking of that value.

As of Oct. 31, 2010, the conference rankings are as follows, with last week’s ranking in parenthesis:

17. MAC East (17)

16. MAC West (16)

15. Sun Belt (15)

14. C-USA East (14)

13. Big East (13)

12. C-USA West (12)

11. MWC (11)

10. WAC (10)

9.   ACC Coastal (8)

8.   ACC Atlantic (9)

7.   SEC East (7)

6.   Independents (4)

5.   Big Ten (5)

4.   Pac-10 (6)

3.   Big 12 North (3)

2.   SEC West (1)

1.   Big 12 South (2)

After determining the conference rankings, I generate values that a team would receive for playing another team. Values are generated for a Home Win, a Home Loss, a Road Win, and a Road Loss.

Each of the values is derived from the Home Win, which is formed by taking the team's place in the conference (first, second, third, etc.), inverting it so more points are awarded for beating the team, and multiplying it by the inversed conference ranking. This is then normalized again for the number of teams in the conference.

For example, if the first place team in the first place conference is Alabama, and Arkansas beats Alabama, they will earn 102 points. This is because Alabama was in first place (inversed = 7 multiplied by inversed conference ranking = 17, 7 * 17 = 102). 

Losses are similar, though there is no inverting. Thus an Arkansas loss will only cause them to lose two points (Place in Conference = 1, Conference Rank = 1, 1 * 1 = 1). I added an additional modifier of two if you are lost at home, so 1 * 2 = 2. A Road Win is the same as a home win, except the value is multiplied by two, and a Road Loss takes the Home Loss and divides it by two. 

Ohtani Little League HR 😨

TOP NEWS

Colts Jaguars Football
With Jayson Tatum sidelined, Celtics' fourth-quarter comeback falls short in Game 7 loss to 76ers
DENVER NUGGETS VS GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS, NBA
Fox's "Special Forces" Red Carpet

TRENDING ON B/R