Cleveland Browns: With Mike Holmgren at the Helm, They Could Succeed
What is it about this team that makes it so different from the Cleveland Browns, and why do I feel like the gap is not as wide as it was?
After all, the Steelers were a team that many predicted wouldn’t make the playoffs, yet here they are, competing for a seventh Super Bowl title.
You hear the word consistency thrown around a lot when discussing the Black and Gold.
But what does that mean?
It means that the Steelers run their organization to win.
In the Super Bowl Era, the Steelers have made 24 playoff appearances, played in 15 AFC Championship Games and are now trying for their seventh Super Bowl in eight appearances.
What will it take to convince you that Mike Holmgren is the right choice to rebuild the Browns?
Year after year, they’re competing for the prize. That’s the kind of consistency we want in Cleveland.
However, even before Art Modell moved the team in 1995, the Browns frustrated their fans with inconsistency. They either tried to hit the home run, or they would take a scorched-earth rebuilding approach. Much of the blame lies with Modell then, and current owner Randy Lerner now.
But somewhere on the way to a 1-11 start last year, Lerner seemingly found religion.
He reached out and convinced Mike Holmgren to become the Browns' President.
Holmgren then reached out and hired Tom Heckert.
Combined, Holmgren and Heckert have 36 years of experience, 25 playoff appearances, nine Conference Championship Game appearances, four Super Bowl appearances and one championship.
Both men have been raised in a culture where winning was expected. They understand that to get to the Super Bowl you have to win—consistently.
So when Mike Holmgren announced the firing of Eric Mangini by saying, “we didn’t win enough games,” it was music to my ears.
Mike Holmgren, like the Pittsburgh Steelers, understands that you have to be in it to win it.
Cleveland Browns fans can only hope that history will repeat itself.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?