JaMarcus Russell: A Fire Without a Blaze?
I don't know what JaMarcus Russell is like off the field. He may have a good personality, I don't know.
But we all know what he's like on the field. That's why JaMarcus deserves the title of Least Valuable Player .
Why is JaMarcus deserving of that title?
Not only is he a terrible starting quarterback at this point, he shows no intensity. He shows no fire. I've never seen him really get mad on the field. I've never seen him show the competitiveness that he needs to show.
He hasn't bashed himself like he should. Instead, he's turned to his teammates.
He showed his youth and immaturity by publicly blaming his teammates for dropping balls and not giving him any help what so ever—partly true. Later that season, he publicly stated that he wouldn't take a pay cut to remain with the team.
You just don't publicly bash your teammates. That's how you lose support in the locker room. If you lose the locker room as a quarterback, you're done. That's it.
That's how it was for JaMarcus Russell. It shouldn't have happened, though.
When you are the quarterback, and things are going less than stellar on the field, you have to be mentally strong. If the crowd is booing you like they've never booed before, dig deep. If they are screaming expletives, dig deeper.
That's the problem. Russell never digs deep mentally. He never overcomes his failures. A lot of his issues are his fundamentals.
But much of it is his persona and how he leads his team.
Russell doesn't have any swagger to him. When I watch him in the game I don't see the starting QB of the Oakland Raiders.
I see a guy who doesn't know what he's doing out there. I see a guy who doesn't take control of his huddle. Most of all, I see a guy who doesn't have an identity.
But what does JaMarcus Russell bring?
All he is at this point in his career is a large athlete. He's not a QB.
Not yet, at least.
Remember, you still need some substance to start fire. Then, you have to keep it lit.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?