BCS Title Game: Best Football or Most Fun to Watch?

It is pretty amusing to read the ridiculous arguments trying to prevent an LSU-Alabama rematch for the BCS National Championship. Most recently, an Oklahoma media outlet called the potential rematch “Snoozefest II.”

I’m sorry Mr. Oklahoma writer, did we bore you with good football rather than the no-defense shootouts that you’re used to in the Big 12?

In the SEC, defenses have pride and think an opponent scoring every possession is unacceptable.

I know that there are fans out there that enjoy watching shootouts, and that’s fine. If that’s your cup of tea, might I recommend the WAC, MWC, Conference USA or Big 12?

If you want the best two teams to play in the BCS Title game, you can’t eliminate someone because they cause a boring matchup.

If you want a bowl game that is 65-60, match up Oklahoma State and Houston in the Fiesta Bowl and watch them battle it out.

That would be fun to watch. 

Unless Oklahoma State dominates Oklahoma, they don’t deserve to play in the BCS title game.

So I guess the voters have their choice.

They can put the two best teams in the title game like the system is intended to do, or they can match up LSU with a non-SEC school and have another blowout win by an SEC school in the BCS title game.

A rematch of LSU and Alabama would be a battle in which either team could win.

It would be a true test of the two best teams in college football and there would be zero doubt at the end of the game that the winner is deserving of the title of BCS National Champion.

LSU’s previous two BCS titles were won against teams that had no business being on the field with the Tigers. 

A matchup with Oklahoma State, Stanford or Virginia Tech would be the same situation.

LSU 13 Bama 10, or LSU 42 OSU 10—you decide.