Freedom of Speech? A Bleacher-Report Memo

As I've written only a few articles and have left a hand full of comments, I'm probably not the guy who's most familiar with the site. 

As this is true, on some of my comments and articles I've written, I'm seeing strong disagreements in the form of insults. 

C'mon guys, let's keep it above the belt.

On my articles I (except for a few) try to keep my opinion's as unbiased as possible.  However, there will be articles in which I present strong feelings and emotions toward a subject or happening in which I am very strongly opinionated; and get this.

I love disagreements.

That's what makes everything so very interesting. Of course, it's only natural to consider yourself right, therefore provide facts favoring toward your point; or that's what any typical debater would do any way. That's way of the fan.

But what must be mentioned is negative comments are unacceptable.

It's not a secret many people will pre-judge an article based on what somebody else has commented about, or how many people did comment on it.  This is perfectly fine with me, except the fact when they scroll down the page and see a comment calling an article with a perfectly good opinion and point ridiculous.

For example, I wrote an article dealing with the recent firing of SEC head coaches.  I made the case maybe these coaches did deserve to be fired.  I stated calmly 100 percent facts, and concluded the big-school firings were because of the inconsistency of the big programs.

A powerhouse football school can not stand to go 10 seasons without almost any national championship talk, right? Then they wouldn't be a powerhouse school anymore, now would they?

I didn't even state if I agreed with it.  The only coach firing I stated I agreed with was the firing of Sylvester Croom. 

He only had one winning season in five at an SEC university.  Now I understand about all of the sanctions he had to deal with, but you should still be able to get your team somewhere around respectable in five years. 

Please read my article about the coaching decisions and tell me if it is a little too much, because I don't think it is at all.

Neither did the first comment out of the two, in which stated it was a "good take on the issue." 

I just ask you when you comment, think about what you're saying. 

If everyone else thinks it's a good point of view, and you say it's idiotic just because you don't agree with it, you come out looking like a bone head and a bully who doesn't understand football.  Thank You.