Billy Casper: A Forgotten Great
When thinking about the greatest golfers of all-time, Billy Casper is a name that rarely comes to mind.
Casperโs prime playing years were during the late 50s to late 60s, an era most remember for golfโs โBig Threeโ which consisted of Nicklaus, Palmer, and Player.
Throughout Casperโs career, he often felt largely overlooked due to the mediaโs unrelenting build up golfโs โBig Three.โย
TOP NEWS

Final Round 2 Mock Draft ๐ฎ

Every NBA Draft 1st-Round Pick

J.B. Bickerstaff RIPS Blazers ๐ซต
It turns out that Casperโs concerns were well-founded, as today, he is all but forgotten when thinking of the greatest players of an era many considered to be golfโs โGolden Age.'
Over the span of 20 years, Casper had 51 PGA Tour wins and won three major championships.
That is an average of 2.55 wins per year throughout Casperโs career.ย
To put that stat into perspective, Nicklaus averaged 2.9 wins per year throughout his career.
Even more impressive, Casperโs prime playing years lasted from 1958-1970, a span that saw Casper win 44 PGA Tour events, which is an incredible average of 3.38 wins per year.
Although Casper does not nearlyย measure up to the โBig Threeโ in terms of major career wins, for a time during the 60โs he was actually winning more PGA Tour events than Palmer, Player, and Nicklaus.
This brings us to an issue that does get nearly enough attention when evaluating a playerโs career.ย
Do we give the number of total career wins enough attention whenย determining the greatness of a playerโs career?ย
When examining the success of a playerโs career, 99.9 percent of the time, the first question asked is, โHow many majors has he won?โ
The question of how many total career wins a player has accumulated is typically just an afterthought, if it is even weighed in on at all.
However, what stat offers more of an insight into a playerโs level of constantly great play than how many total tournaments he has won throughout his career?
Lets compare this issue to other sports.
What is more impressive, the all-time World Series home run leader or a player who has hit 500 career home runs?
Who is more impressive, the NBA finals all-time leading scorer of the NBAโs all-time leading scorer?ย
Sure, winning the big events and excelling under the most intense pressure should without questionย carry a lot of weight when examining the success of a playerโs career, but, it should not be the end-all.ย
Comparing Casperโs total career wins to other players who typical appear on any list of the gameโs greatest players, Casper holds up better thanย one would imagine.
Casperโs 51 career wins ranks seventh all-time and is better than Walter Hagan (44 wins), Gene Sarazen (39 wins), Tom Watson (39 wins), and Gary Player (25 wins).ย
Now, the argument against Casper is that he has only won three majors, which is a very legitimate argument.
However, what is more impressive, a player with 51 career wins and three majors or a player with 25 career wins and nine majors?
That is one of the most difficult questions to answer in all of sports.ย
Majors are, without question, the toughest tournaments to win as they are played on the most treacherous courses and are attended by virtually every top player in the world, thus making any major win a lot more impressive than the average run-of-the-mill tour win.
But winning any PGA Tour event is no walk in the park either.ย
Billy Casperโs career has been all but forgotten for two main reasons; he was not branded by the media as on of the โBig Threeโ and his lack of career major wins.
Theย tremendous amount of weight we put onto just four events, the majors,ย has resulted in players such as Casper falling through the cracks.ย
Despite being ranked seventh in all-time PGA Tour wins and averaging an incredible 3.38 wins per year during his prime, Casperโs accomplishments have been all but lost in golfโs history.






