FA Follies: Why England Needs an English Manager
How far can England's search for a new manager go?
More to the point, how far WILL it go?
Sven-Goran Eriksson was the first foreign experiment in the top spot—and that went well, didn't it?
Riddle me this: Once we embrace the idea of non-English England managers, how long will it be before we have foreigners among the backroom staff—and even on the roster?
How long before international duty becomes a club system on a larger stage?
You may think that logic silly, or even extreme—but I question what good can come of hiring anyone whose first allegiance won't be to England the country.
No international team has ever won a World Cup with a foreign manager.
That's a fact—and it's no coincidence.
Face it: We need an English manager for the England job—because only a true Englishman can bring the sort passion and determination that will win us a major trophy.
That's true of every country in the world.
I say the FA should speak to Sam Allardyce, Alan Curbishley, and Stuart Pearce—even though all three have reportedly ruled themselves out of consideration.
And if we can't find a candidate with experience, why not train someone to be an international manager?
The idea that that we can't develop domestic talent is a distinctly club mentality. A young player can't improve; therefore you buy a new player.
The same fallacious thinking is being applied to the England job—and so the FA is hoping wads of cash make for a quick fix.
Again.
Being English, it seems, is no longer a prerequisite for the England managerial job—but rather simply a bonus.
For shame.

.jpg)







