
NFL Draft 400: Top LBs for 2018 NFL Draft
Scouts and general managers have called the 2018Ā NFLĀ draft class average, but we still have questions. Who is the best overall player? How about the best at each position?Ā
The NFL Draft 400's goal is to figure that out.Ā
We tracked, scouted, graded and ranked theĀ top 400 prospectsĀ with help from scouting assistants Marshal Miller, Dan Bazal and Jerod Brown. Together, we viewed tape of a minimum of three games per playerāthe same standard NFL teams use. Oftentimes, we saw every play from a prospect over the last two years.Ā
Strengths and weaknesses figured into the grades, with a pro-player comparison added to match the prospect's style or fit in the pros. The top 400 prospects will be broken down by position for easy viewing before the release of a top-400 big board prior to the April 26-28 draft.
In the case of a tie, players were ranked based on their overall grade in our top 400.
35. Jermaine Carter, Maryland
1 of 35
POSITIVES
āA two-time team captain (2016, 2017) and the team's Defensive Player of the Year.
āScouts praised his work ethic, character, IQ and maturity. Great locker room guy.
āVery active tackler who packs a punch when he meets the ball-carrier.
āHas experience on special teams.
āSmart and poised when diagnosing but explodes through alleys to make hits.
NEGATIVES
āUndersized at 6'0" and 222 pounds.
āRan a 4.68 at his pro day and missed the bench press due to a pectoral injury.
āShort-area quickness is lacking; was able to get by on instincts and football IQ.
āBlockers will end his day if he's not kept clean by his defensive line.
āDoesn't have the size, strength or speed to handle NFL offenses.
OVERALL
Jermaine Carter was incredibly productive at Maryland, leading the team in tackles each of the last three seasons, but simply lacks the height/weight/speed to be considered a draftable prospect. His motor and football IQ, plus special teams experience, make him a valuable free-agent pickup.
GRADE: 4.99 (Camp Body)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Devante Bond, Tampa Bay Buccaneers
34. Chris Worley, Ohio State
2 of 35
POSITIVES
āStarted two seasons as an outside linebacker.
āShows toughness and instincts on the field and makes up for a lack of athleticism with aggressiveness.
āSmart, disciplined player who will perform his assignment; reliable.
āStrong tackler who can wrap up, come to balance and secure the hit with few misses.
NEGATIVES
āTimed at 4.86 seconds in the 40-yard dash.
āLacks the athleticism or size to dominate. Was an average college player.
āNo twitch to his game.
āAllows himself to be easily blocked if he doesn't beat the block with force.
āStiff as a board and lacks the lower-body flexibility needed to run in space with NFL talent.
OVERALL
Chris Worley was a solid performer for Ohio State but is limited athletically and lacks the size (6'2", 230 lbs) to make up for his deficiencies. He has the tools to be a strong backup or special teams player as a priority free agent.
GRADE: 4.99 (Camp Body)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Jordan Evans, Cincinnati Bengals
33. Jacob Pugh, Florida State
3 of 35
POSITIVES
āLong, lean athlete with good speed on a 6'4", 232-pound frame.
āHas experience as a defensive end and could fill out and be used as an edge-rusher.
āShows good agility in space and has the hips to redirect and recover on the edge.
āRuns down ball-carriers easily and chews up yardage with a long stride.
āPugh looks natural moving on the field and could intrigue teams with his athletic potential.
NEGATIVES
āNeeds to fill out his frame to better take on blockers.
āHas to better learn to use a long arm to keep blockers away; can be timid at the point of attack.
āLooked timid and unsure of what to do at times.
āTo make an NFL roster, he has to get stronger and better use his strength on the field.
OVERALL
Jacob Pugh looks the part but isĀ built like a small forward and needs to fill out his long frame. If he can add bulk and strength, it's not out of the question that he could develop into a quality backup situational pass-rusher. He's worth a look late if teams are OK with his work ethic and motor.
GRADE: 5.00 (Priority Free Agent)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Koa Misi, free agent
32. Azeem Victor, Washington
4 of 35
POSITIVES
āAggressive player who isn't afraid to poke his nose into traffic and stuff the run.
āPlays with good instincts; his 2016 tape showed a high football IQ.
āUses his hands well to stack and shed but also to get physical when in coverage.
āSinks into zones well and can close on routes coming up to play the ball.
āTrue downhill thumper who attacked the run game.
NEGATIVES
āTested well below NFL standards with a 4.4 short shuttle and a 7.2 three-cone to go along with an average
4.72 in the 40.
āAlmost declared for 2017 draft but broke his leg in November 2016.
āStarted only five games in 2017; suspended after DUI arrest; appeared out of shape and unmotivated
compared to previous seasons.
āCoaches did not vouch for him when we talked to them. Isn't a self-motivator.
āWas benched as a senior.
OVERALL
Azeem Victor was a big name in 2016 but didn't look the same this past season. A poor showing at the combine didn't help his stock since there were already concerns about work ethic and motivation. Victor is unlikely to be drafted.
GRADE: 5.00 (Priority Free Agent)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Manti Te'o, New Orleans Saints
31. Nick DeLuca, North Dakota State
5 of 35
POSITIVES
āAbove-average mental processing that puts him in the right place more often than not.
āHigh-level instincts that keep him in the action often.
āSpecial teams experience and willingness to compete.
āVocal player; a quick learner who can direct a defense.
NEGATIVES
āShoulder injury in 2016 and torn meniscus in 2017.
āStruggled in Senior Bowl practices, often playing too upright and with a forward lean.
āLimited athlete with speed concerns who will be exploited in NFL.
āAverage change-of-direction skills that become a problem moving laterally through traffic.
āWill be chewed up in isolation against NFL talent in the backfield.
OVERALL
Nick DeLuca is a smart player who has found ways to mask some of his athletic limitations. At the Senior Bowl, however, those limitations stood out rather easily both in linebacker drills and on the field for team portions. DeLuca will have to consistently diagnose plays correctly to have any shot at being an effective NFL linebacker. If a team can manage with him as a depth piece, he has the commitment and willingness to learn any backup spot and contribute on all special teams.
GRADE: 5.00 (Priority Free Agent)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Nick Bellore, Detroit Lions
30. Tre' Williams, Auburn
6 of 35
POSITIVES
āThumper who loves to hit and made many big tackles at the Senior Bowl.
āVery physical taking on blockers and sniffing out the run in the middle of the field.
āOld-school mentality and relishes opportunities to put pads on ball-carriers.
āInstincts, timing and awareness all scored high.
NEGATIVES
āOnly one year (2017) as a full-time starter.
āShoulder injury limited him to eight starts.
āDoesn't have ideal speed or range to project as a starting linebacker prospect.
āLow-impact player on game days. Only had 50 total tackles (24 solo) in 2017. Easy to lose him on film.
OVERALL
Tre' Williams made a name for himself with big hits at the Senior Bowl, but he lacks the hips and speed to play in space in the NFL. He projects well as a backup middle linebacker whose aggressive, physical style would play well on special teams.
GRADE: 5.00 (Priority Free Agent)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Mike Hull, Miami Dolphins
29. Jason Cabinda, Penn State
7 of 35
POSITIVES
āTough, physical "Mike" linebacker who attacks the run.
āExcellent leader on and off the field. Received high character grades from scouts.
āNaturally strong and uses his base well to anchor against the run or come to balance as a tackler.
āIs aggressive stacking up blockers and will look to run over a pulling guard or fullback.
āShoots gaps well and is quick to read the run.
NEGATIVES
āLacks the open-field speed to be an NFL starter.
āStruggles to reach outside runs and can get caught behind the play.
āOffers limited upside as a coverage 'backer due to tight hips and sluggish feet.
āWon't open his hips and cover much ground. Heavy feet.
OVERALL
Jason Cabinda was productive at Penn State and looks the part of a throwback linebacker, but he simply lacks the athleticism to make an impact at the next level. He could carve out a career as a backup and special teams stud.
GRADE: 5.10 (Priority Free Agent)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Ben Heeney, Houston Texans
28. Matthew Thomas, Florida State
8 of 35
POSITIVES
āA big, athletic, rangy linebacker
āBrings the wood as a hitter and can rock ball-carriers.
āOpens his hips and flies to the ball when he has a clean alley.
āHas the open-field speed to run down ball-carriers outside the hashes.
āGood size (6'3", 232 lbs) to play any linebacker position but looks like a natural at "Will".
āFormer top-15 overall recruit in the 2013 prep class.
NEGATIVES
āSmall hands on a big frame at just 8 ā
".
āSuspended for six games in 2013 for violating team rules.
āScouts complained he doesn't play aggressively enough, which shows up on film.
āReaction time is poor and relies too much on athleticism to get in position to make a play.
āDoesn't use hands or length to keep blockers off his body; is constantly locked up.
OVERALL
Matthew Thomas is a big name because of his ranking coming out of high school, but he struggled to develop at FSU and has never popped on film as a high-impact player. He's athletic enough to stick in the pros but isn't the type of player you spend a premium pick on.
GRADE: 5.10 (Priority Free Agent)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Kamalei Correa, Baltimore Ravens
27. Kenny Young, UCLA
9 of 35
POSITIVES
āLegitimate sideline-to-sideline speed; can pursue boundary runs to the strong side.
āCoverage ability to stay on the field on third down whether matched up in man or zone coverage.
āSolid fluidity to open up and run when reads are clear to the edge.
āShort-area agility to restrict cutback lanes and weave through traffic.
āIdentifies responsibilities and rarely deviates or freelances.
NEGATIVES
āOne-track player who won't make the game-changing flash plays in multiple phases as a defender.
āHe's routinely late in all phases; he's late to diagnose, late to fire feet and late to get downhill.
āNot the kind of banger teams want at linebacker and will have to develop technique to maskĀ deficiencies.Ā
āElects to dip around blocks rather than take them on and disengage.
āToughness and consistent hustle/effort is a concern.
OVERALL
Kenny Young is a good athlete who can become locked on to specific roles on a play-to-play basis. In some ways that helps his projection if a team bets on consistency. At the same time, teams will want to see him make decisions out of structure that create some of the game-changing plays to win games. He's an immediate special teams contributor who should hold a spot during training camp.
GRADE: 5.20 (Priority Free Agent)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Kirk Morrison, retired
26. Joel Iyiegbuniwe, Western Kentucky
10 of 35
POSITIVES
āAthletic with easy movements in space.
āNatural ability to bend and attack with good closing speed.
āHas the feet and hips to drop into zone coverage and can find the ball well when facing the quarterback.
āSuper productive with 11.5 tackles for loss and first-team All-Conference USA honors in 2017.
āCan make splash plays in space thanks to burst and closing speed; has impressive range.
NEGATIVES
āUndersized at 6'1", 229 lbs and lacks play strength.
āCan be late to read and react and gets caught behind the play.
āHas long arms (32 ā
") and big hands (10 ¼") but doesn't use them to keep blockers off him or shed.
āJunior entry to the 2017 draft hasn't seen much top-tier competition.
āLacks the size or strength to consistently stay free and clean to use his athleticism to make plays.
OVERALL
Joel Iyiegbuniwe has traits to warrant consideration as a late-rounder but is more of a developmental prospect who likely would need to work his way onto the roster as a sub-package 'backer and special teams performer.
GRADE: 5.30 (Priority Free Agent)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Matt Milano, Buffalo Bills
25. Chris Covington, Indiana
11 of 35
POSITIVES
āWell-built that combines enough speed and physicality to be effective in NFL.
āCan open up and run with the best of them.
āMoldable prospect that has baseline athleticism and is still learning position.
āNatural athlete who is ultra-competitive.
āGood tackler who brings some "pop" and runs behind his pads.
NEGATIVES
āConverted QB with limited experience at the position.
āUnderwhelming diagnose skills and doesn't read and react like other linebackers yet.
āTechnical aspects of position are undeveloped.
āDoesn't have functional hand usage to take on blocks and disengage.
āOverruns gaps and loses leverage.
OVERALL
Chris Covington is a sturdy athlete with the requisite athleticism and power to compete for a role in the NFL. As a converted quarterback who began his collegiate career as a passer, the questions about Covington's long-term linebacker projection linger. He'll have to spend a couple of years learning the nuances of the linebacker position before being expected to do too much, but the foundation is there to warrant a look during training camp.
GRADE: 5.30 (Priority Free Agent)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Avery Williamson, New York Jets
24. Ja'Whaun Bentley, Purdue
12 of 35
POSITIVES
āThick-bodied and can defend the inside run with ease.
āNot a player who linemen will want to meet in the hole consistently, as he comes with nasty power downhill.
āHeavyweight boxer who punches with force and muscular upper body.
āHe'll drop all of his weight into his hips for tackles and doesn't miss much.
NEGATIVES
āACL tear in 2015 and limited playing time in 2016.
āUnderwhelming athlete who will be exposed as a coverage player in both man and zone.
āSpeed is a real concern; he's almost unplayable against zone schemes that work him laterally.
āWill struggle to reach backside runs and is almost entirely a Mike at the next level.
āNeeds to work flexibility into his training to gain the necessary mobility.
OVERALL
Ja'Waughn Bentley looks like a linebacker from the early 90's with a thick frame and ability to handle power inside better than most. The NFL is transitioning away from that need, however, and Bentley's skill set is becoming irrelevant. He'll struggle to compete against NFL-caliber athletes in space, limiting what a team can ask him to do.
GRADE: 5.30 (Priority Free Agent)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Hardy Nickerson Jr., Cincinnati Bengals
23. Skai Moore, South Carolina
13 of 35
POSITIVES
āQuick to read plays and get into coverage or into gaps.
āFour-year starter with incredible production. Made some form of All-SEC team all four years.
āAthletic enough to slip past blockers. Strong enough to rip through.
āMakes plays sideline to sideline.
āVery capable blitzer after playing in Will Muschamp's defense.
NEGATIVES
āNeck surgery after the 2015 season. Sat out the 2016 season.
āSize will be a concern, especially for inside linebacker.
āHeavy-footed and stiff hips for a linebacker his size.
āChange of direction is slow and labored.
āBelow average athletically.
OVERALL
It is hard to overlook the severity of his neck injury and missed time. Skai Moore already comes in as an undersized inside linebacker who lacks athleticism. He is going to win time on the field with work in the film room and natural instincts as a player. Limited agility may make it difficult for him to contribute on special teams.
GRADE: 5.30 (Priority Free Agent)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: D'Qwell Jackson, free agent
22. Zaire Franklin, Syracuse
14 of 35
POSITIVES
āThree-time team captain; the first at Syracuse since the 1890s.
āFast linebacker seen running down top speed back Nyheim Hines in the open field.
āHigh-character leader whom coaches raved about to us.
āAthletic hips and feet allow him to cleanly move through space.
āHas natural play strength that lets him bench-press blockers off his frame.
āAll-around athlete who looks the part on film.
NEGATIVES
āShort (6'0") for NFL standards at the position with average length.
āCan get washed down in the run game and struggles to stay clean.
āMaxed-out player who has seen a lot of snaps and collisions in the last three years.
āCan be late to start and will let the play run before he attacks.
OVERALL
Zaire Franklin somehow slid under the radar and wasn't invited to the combine, but his film and pro day numbers all point to a draftable prospect. He's a tad undersized, but his instincts and character are worth taking a gamble on.
GRADE: 5.40 (Round 7)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Chris Borland, retired
21. Oren Burks, Vanderbilt
15 of 35
POSITIVES
āHas experience as an inside and outside linebacker, as well as in a 3-4 and 4-3 defense.
āQuick feet allow him to excel in coverage and get to the football quickly.
āMatches up well against athletic running backs and tight ends in man coverage.
āFearlessly takes on blockers and fills gaps.
āGreat character off the field and established leader on the field.
NEGATIVES
āToo slow to analyze plays in front of him. Has to rely too much on speed to make tackles.
āUnafraid of blockers and playing in traffic but struggles to disengage from blocks.
āGreat speed for the position (4.59) but overruns plays.
āNeeds to add strength at the point of contact, tackling and taking on blocks.
āDefensive scheme changes at Vanderbilt left him without a true position.
OVERALL
A very athletically gifted linebacker with a ton of experience in different schemes. However, all the changes on defense left Oren Burks without a true position and puts him behind fundamentally. He will fit in well with a team that runs multiple sub-packages and is looking for a good coverage linebacker with special teams upside. Burks will be a late-round selection to develop and play on special teams in the meantime.
GRADE: 5.50 (Round 6)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON:Ā Derrick Johnson, free agent
20. Shaun Dion Hamilton, Alabama
16 of 35
POSITIVES
āHigh football IQ and leader of a very successful defense with some highly drafted players.
āWill provide great depth at linebacker with a late-round selection.
āHas been asked to play many roles in Alabama's defense and was productive.
āKeeps good position and outside shoulder free to force plays inside.
āGood footwork on film with quick drops and limited false steps.
NEGATIVES
āDoesn't initiate contact with ball-carriers; lets them make contact with him.
āMultiple injuries while at Alabama. ACL and fractured kneecap.
āUndersized. Weighing in at only 228 pounds andĀ 6'0".
āBailed out in missed reads by outstanding talent around him.Ā
OVERALL
Two bad right knee injuries cannot be overlooked by NFL teams. Shaun Dion Hamilton has not been able to test for teams and needed to show his range and athleticism. Fundamentally, Hamilton is very solid and well-coached. An instinctual player who can drop into coverage and play in traffic. Despite not being the best prospect at the position, Hamilton has been able to earn playing time in a star-studded defense throughout his career at Alabama. Teams will fall in love with his IQ and leadership skills.
GRADE: 5.50 (Round 6)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: D.J. Alexander, Seattle Seahawks
19. Keishawn Bierria, Washington
17 of 35
POSITIVES
āHas desired experience as multiyear contributor.
āCompetitive toughness and hustle are immediately apparent.
āGood vision and processing to put himself in position pre- and post-snap.
āAble to work through mess while on path to ball-carriers.
NEGATIVES
āWill lose race to the edge in outside run support against legitimate NFL talent.
āFrame could use a little more thickness in lower half to handle consistent power in gaps.
āDoesn't move like an athlete his size and looks rigid in transitional movements.
āLimited overall athletic ability that will be exposed against better NFL talent.
āHalf-second delay to diagnose that is only heightened in the NFL.
OVERALL
Keishawn Bierria is an ultimate competitor and wins with hustle and effort each and every down. Unfortunately, those are the minimum requirements in the NFL, and the other aspects of his play leave a bit to be desired. He's an average athlete at best and will need time studying film to learn the ways he can position himself to be successful. Teams looking for a depth player and core special-teamer could find it in Bierria.
GRADE: 5.60 (Round 6)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Paul Worrilow, Philadelphia Eagles
18. Dorian O'Daniel, Clemson
18 of 35
POSITIVES
āVersatile athlete that will play on all special teams.
āAbove-average lateral agility that helps weave through traffic in the box.
āMental processing as a zone defender is impressive; shows awareness to match concepts.
āDrops chest and rolls hips through contact to be an efficient tackler.
NEGATIVES
āUndersized frame but doesn't run fast enough to back it up.
āLimited experience makes projection a question about whether 2017 was a flash in the pan.
āShort-area speed is limited and causes him to lead with chest because feet are behind.
āWill struggle to match up physically with tight ends in coverage.
āStruggles to get off blocks with physicality and can be locked up early in the rep.
OVERALL
Special teams value is critical for backup linebackers in the NFL. Dorian O'Daniel will have to prove he can continue to be a special teams standout while fighting for a depth role as a linebacker. A lack of size and pure speed make him a difficult player to find a position for. He's average in most areas and lacks a top-tier trait to hang his hat on, forcing evaluators to look long and hard when trying to find a fit.
GRADE: 5.65 (Round 5-6)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Cory James, Oakland Raiders
17. Jack Cichy, Wisconsin
19 of 35
POSITIVES
āWas on path to be four-year contributor at big-time school suggesting coaching staff saw all necessary traits.
āDoesn't waste time getting lower half into motion once he's committed to a read.
āInstincts and processing skills are above-average and put him in the right spot more often than not.
āProductive blitzer who shows solid hand usage to keep himself clean in traffic.
NEGATIVES
āMissed second half of 2016 with pec injury and missed all of 2017 with knee injury.
āLimited athlete who wins by being correct and can struggle to even compete if his instincts are wrong.
āAverage height but routinely plays high and upright; will struggle to routinely win leverage.
āLimited playing time makes him even more of a projection than most.
āTwo-down linebacker who will be exposed by skill players in space at the next level.
OVERALL
Jack Cichy's injuries are a major concern and will weigh heavily in his evaluation. He simply doesn't have enough consistent tape to know what teams will be getting at the next level. Throw in his limited athleticism and teams will be guessing about where exactly he'll fit with their teams. The instincts are obvious and Wisconsin's staff clearly had high hopes, suggesting there's enough there to warrant a look.
GRADE: 5.65 (Round 5-6)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Nick Kwiatkoski, Chicago Bears
16. Andre Smith, North Carolina
20 of 35
POSITIVES
āWill hit everything that moves.
āEfficient tackler who made play after play in 2016.
āShort and squatty frame that handles contact well.
āGood vision to read through gaps at line of scrimmage as plays develop.
āHandles power at the point of attack well and can out-leverage in gaps.
NEGATIVES
āKnee injury ended 2017 season after just two games.
āDoesn't run like a traditional three-down linebacker.
āLength and speed will become an issue in man coverage against average tight ends in the NFL.
āLower-body strength is underwhelming; can't dig in when he doesn't win immediate leverage.
āLimited on-field experience.
OVERALL
Andre Smith's season-ending knee injury will give teams pause when trying to project him to the NFL. With only one year of consistent tape, he's an unfinished prospect. Nonetheless, Smith has no fear of contact and will stick his nose in every play. Teams will love his hard-hitting aggressiveness and may feel comfortable living with his limited athleticism
GRADE: 5.65 (Round 5-6)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Mason Foster, Washington Redskins
15. Christian Sam, Arizona State
21 of 35
POSITIVES
āExcellent size and thickness to play the run as a gap-shooting linebacker.
āCan stay on the field on third down with the hips to open up and run in coverage.
āAbove-average explosiveness and change-of-direction ability.
āSolid tackler who can wrap and control in space.
āCoverage instincts are strong with awareness to break on passes.
NEGATIVES
āMissed essentially all of 2016 with foot injury.
āInconsistency is maddening and leads to concerns about his hustle.
āAvoids blocks with athleticism and loses leverage to boundary.
āDiagnose skills look underdeveloped and will need consistent tape study in NFL.
āDoesn't stack out and redirect with the efficiency of better linebackers in this class.
OVERALL
Christian Sam has a NFL-ready frame and the combination of skills that will make him a valuable three-down linebacker at the next level. Inconsistency in effort on film is a major concern and will hold him back as a rookie. He's certainly worth a roster spot to develop as a versatile backup, but the routine plays have to be no-brainers for starters in the NFLāand that's not the case yet with Sam.
GRADE: 5.69 (Round 5-6)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Stephone Anthony, Miami Dolphins
14. Genard Avery, Memphis
22 of 35
POSITIVES
āFour-year experience with variety of responsibilities.
āAble to time rushes and lives behind the line of scrimmage.
āStout player with thick upper body that can withstand NFL contact.
āAbove-average hand usage as pass-rusher and can play on the line of scrimmage.
āRidiculous athleticism given his body type (6'1", 255 lbs); can move well in space.
NEGATIVES
āNot a click-and-close player as an inside linebacker.
āLacks vision and instincts as a true inside linebacker to read keys.
āWill be exploited in man coverage against backs.
āMisjudges angles to the boundary as a stacked backer and will get lost in space.
āDoesn't use his thickness well to stack and shed with power.
OVERALL
Genard Avery has a diverse skill set that should intrigue teams looking for a linebacker to play on the line of scrimmage. He's likely best as a strong-side linebacker in a 4-3 defense or an outside linebacker in a 3-4. He has more than enough athleticism given his thick frame, but the instincts and vision needed to diagnose NFL offenses in motion are lacking and limit his ability as a true inside linebacker.
GRADE: 5.70 (Round 5)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Sam Acho, Chicago Bears
13. Mike McCray, Michigan
23 of 35
POSITIVES
āBig-time NFL size and length.
āWillingness to play downhill as an inside linebacker with power.
āDoesn't waste time getting going and can read entire picture quickly.
āSolid as a middle-hole dropper with eyes to redirect to concepts as they happen.
āForces the issue on climbing offensive linemen and looks to squarely take on blocks.
NEGATIVES
āMissed all of 2015 with various injuries.
āNot a legitimate three-down player and will struggle in man coverage against average athletes.
āPlay speed is a concern when edge is threatened.
āDoesn't have the hip fluidity to open and run to boundary with necessary pace.
āUncomfortable runner who has forced, heavy-footed gait.
OVERALL
Mike McCray has all of the thump and toughness that teams hope to get from a true inside linebacker. However, his athleticism is limited and may force him off the field on third downs. He looks like an unnatural mover struggling to reach the top speed needed to compete. McCray is best as an inside backer who isn't the primary coverage guy on the field and can instead use mental processing and power to be a productive player.
GRADE: 5.80 (Round 4)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Max Bullough, free agent
12. Fred Warner, BYU
24 of 35
POSITIVES
āExcellent height and length to be an effective coverage player down the field.
āAbove-average athlete for the position.
āMoveable piece who can play matchups and provide defensive positional flexibility.
āFires feet to throttle down and burst with efficient steps and good explosiveness.
āDoesn't waste time getting a jump on plays and can make flash stops all over the field.
NEGATIVES
āSpatial awareness lapsesĀ when in motion and causes inconsistent strike points.
āLong and lengthy player who doesn't look like a traditional inside linebacker from a thickness perspective.
āArm tackler in space who can overrun clean contact.
āLeverage and gap strength as an interior run defender needs improvement.
OVERALL
Fred Warner's length and ability to match up against multiple positions in coverage will make him a highly coveted sub-package player early in his career. The trick will be defining a long-term position or role for Warner that keeps him on the field as an effective player for all three downs. Some of his mechanics have to be cleaned up, but the athletic base is eye-popping as a prospect.
GRADE: 5.90 (Round 4)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Zach Cunningham, Houston Texans
11. Shaquem Griffin, UCF
25 of 35
POSITIVES
āProductive all over the field for UCF, including as an edge-blitzer.
āAbove-average athletic ability and versatility.
āToughness, competitiveness and desire are unquestionable.
āWas asked to practice at multiple positions at Senior Bowl and impressed with mental processing ability.
āAggressive hitter who brings chest and hips through every tackle.
NEGATIVES
āWill struggle to disengage from blocks when offensive linemen have strong grip strength and can stack him out.
āStands tall and relies on athleticism to run around; has to show a consistent ability to deconstruct blocks in the gap.
āMost of his weight is from his midsection up; will need to fill out his lower body if he is going to consistently play inside.
āPlay strength to blow up power inside needs more developing.
OVERALL
Shaquem Griffin obviously meets the marks when it comes to competitive toughness and heart. Complications during pregnancy led to Griffin's left hand not developing fully. As a result, he had the hand amputated at the low forearm when he was four years old. Now, he's an above-average athlete who has all of the movement skills to be a weak-side 'backer in a 4-3 defense. There's no precedent for how the NFL might judge Griffin, but he's worth a comfortable mid-round pick.
GRADE: 5.99 (Round 4)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Duke Riley, Atlanta Falcons
10. Micah Kiser, Virginia
26 of 35
POSITIVES
āFour-year production with big-time tackle numbers over last three seasons.
āNFL-ready frame that can handle physicality with ease.
āPlay strength and tenacity to fill downhill on inside runs.
āInstincts and competitiveness to fit through trash and always find the ball.
āDo-it-all 'backer who can have an effect in all three phases.
NEGATIVES
āWon't be a backside tackler on edge runs due to a lack of true range versus speed.
āBoom-or-bust tackler.
āNot a player who can handle space against average NFL athletes one-no-one.
āChange of direction exposes limited flexibility and tight hips to open and run downfield.
āForm tackles are few and far between and will lead to close calls or extra yardage in the NFL.
OVERALL
Micah Kiser's numbers are eye-popping and highlight a player who routinely tracks the ball and makes plays when it matters. He has a relentless motor that keeps him active in all phases and will endear him with NFL coaches who love toughness and hustle. A limited athletic skill set makes specific matchups worrisome, but Kiser's thumping attitude is built for the NFL.
GRADE: 5.99 (Round 4)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Blake Martinez, Green Bay Packers
9. Josey Jewell, Iowa
27 of 35
POSITIVES
āRelentless competitor who is always around the ball.
āSquares up contact and can roll hips through tackles for efficient stops.
āSee-it-and-go type of processor in run support who fires from processing to action immediately.
āSniffs out screens and diagnoses quickly to compensate for athletic limitations.
āTechnician who wins with fundamentals and sound hand usage.
NEGATIVES
āAverage athlete who will have to win with film study at the next level.
āChange-of-direction skills show up in man coverage and will be exploited by offensive coordinators.
āRuns into everything and doesn't show much of an ability to dip and rip through contact.
āDrops eyes into contact and can out-leverage himself unintentionally.
āLateral speed is underwhelming and causes concern consistently defending edge runs.
OVERALL
Josey Jewell is an ode to the throwback linebacker in playing style despite a frame that doesn't quite match. He lives near the ball and racks up tackle after tackle, an encouraging sign that highlights his instincts and competitiveness. Jewell will struggle when isolated against above-average athletes in space and will have to rely on tape study to compensate.
GRADE: 6.00 (Round 3)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Chris Borland, retired
8. Tegray Scales, Indiana
28 of 35
POSITIVES
āFour-year experience and production at Indiana.
ā2016 tape was even better than 2017 and showed a tackling machine.
āInstinctual player with a nose for the ball.
āPlaymaker in all phases who can create turnovers, force big stops and make game-changing plays.
āCan stack and shed blocks with the top-tier linebackers in this class.
NEGATIVES
āShort, squatty frame that doesn't have length or weight desired for NFL.
āStruggles to routinely handle power at the point of attack.
āMan-coverage skills will have to improve at the next level, or better athletes will expose him.
āAverage speed; has to rely on instincts to get to front-side edge runs against speed.
āWhen instincts are wrong, back side of runs can be left with a soft second level because heĀ overpursued.
OVERALL
Tegray Scales filled the stat sheet in 2016 in every category and was a clear leader of the defense. He has the instincts and playmaking knack that simply can't be coached up. He'll have to continue developing varied manners to handle power at the point of attack, but the foundation is there for a successful linebacker at the next level.
GRADE: 6.00 (Round 3)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Will Compton, Tennessee Titans
7. Darius Leonard, South Carolina State
29 of 35
POSITIVES
āFour-year contributor who filled up the stat sheets in all phases.
āAbove-average arm length for his height that aids in reach and stacking out blockers.
āQuick-trigger athlete who doesn't waste motion to hit top speed in a hurry.
āAbove-average eye discipline to match concepts in motion and make plays on the ball.
āLateral agility is impressive, allowing him to flow smoothly as plays develop.
NEGATIVES
āUndersized frame at 6'2", 229 pounds, and may not be able to add much more.
āDoesn't play with the nastiness and intensity of other top linebackers in this class.
āAthleticism can't be his only trick in the NFL, and he'll have to show more fundamental block-destructionĀ technique.
āConsistent tackler but doesn't hit with the finishing force you'd like to see from a stud defender.
āDrops eyes into contact and will out-leverage himself too easily.
OVERALL
Darius Leonard's production is impressive regardless of the school where he played. He made a living by chasing the ball and relying on above-average athleticism to mask some technical deficiencies. Leonard's body may not be able to add much more weight, but if he can get into a system as a stacked 'backer with protective beef up front, he could be an excellent gap-shooting weak-side linebacker.
GRADE: 6.45 (Round 3)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Jatavis Brown, San Diego Chargers
6. Jerome Baker, Ohio State
30 of 35
POSITIVES
āAbove-average athlete with sideline-to-sideline range.
āIdeal coverage linebacker who can hang in space with backfield athletes.
āLateral agility is excellent and highlights rare athleticism for the position.
āEvades blockers in space and makes for a difficult second-level target for offensive linemen.
āBall skills are strong and show a player capable of generating turnovers in the NFL.
NEGATIVES
āWill be steamrolled with routine power.
āSlow to process and can't compensate when offense is equally speedy to edge.
āUndersized frame; will struggle to match strength at the point of attack.
āSlow to fill downhill when he knows it will be a dog fight inside.
āLacks varied hand usage to disengage or redirect in space.
OVERALL
Jermome Baker is a supremely talented linebacker who looks to fit the mold of the NFL's new-age linebackers. He has the range to make tackles on either sideline and the coverage instincts to stay on the field on third down. Concerns about Baker's size and competitive toughness against beef up front will have to be answered for him to be seen as an immediate starter at the next level.
GRADE: 6.50 (Round 2-3)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Deion Jones, Atlanta Falcons
5. Malik Jefferson, Texas
31 of 35
POSITIVES
āTop-tier athlete with special burst and open-field speed.
āHas the natural strength to stack blockers or press in coverage at the line of scrimmage.
āScheme and position versatility with upside as a pass-rusher or off-ball linebacker.
āCan chase down ball-carriers with ease and has the speed to run with tight ends up the seam.
āStill developing nuances of the position; his best football could still be ahead of him.
āSee-ball, get-ball type linebacker who can be a mismatch for offenses to worry about.
NEGATIVES
āMoved around the Texas defense with only one year of notable production.
āNagging injuries affected him in his first two seasons.
āInstincts are a step late, which he covered up with speed at Texas.
āMissed tackles were an issue; needs to square up ball-carriers better and make less whip-style tackles.
OVERALL
On athleticism and upside, Malik Jefferson is a first-rounder, but every team must evaluate him differently. He isn't a fit in a scheme that wants him to sit and read, but if he's freed up to make plays either in space or coming off the edge as a pass-rusher, he could make a huge immediate impact.
GRADE: 6.99 (Round 2)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Ryan Shazier, Pittsburgh Steelers
4. Rashaan Evans, Alabama
32 of 35
POSITIVES
āHas excellent size (6'2", 232 lbs) with the speed to chase and attack.
āUsed all over the defense at Alabama and has experience in coverage and as a pass-rusher.
āFrame and speed scream Will linebacker but can also play Mike; versatility is a selling point.
āHigh-IQ linebacker tasked with setting up the Crimson Tide defense; quicker read-and-react.
āTough, old-school mentality in a new-era athletic frame.
āBurst to close on the ball is special; plays with violence.
NEGATIVES
āPlayed in a defensive system that kept him clean from blockers.
āMaxed out physically and played through a groin injury in 2017.
āCan get caught behind the play and doesn't run through blockers.
āScouts worried he's not a fast processor playing middle linebacker.
OVERALL
Rashaan Evans is what the NFL wants in a modern linebacker. He's fast, versatile and tough in the middle of the field. With his tools as a run defender, blitzer and an upside player in coverage, he has all the makings of a first-rounder.
GRADE: 7.00 (Round 1)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Alec Ogletree, New York Giants
3. Leighton Vander Esch, Boise State
33 of 35
POSITIVES
āBig (6'4", 256 lbs) and long (33 ā
" arms) with excellent speed and agility.
āThree-down impact player who was used as a blitzer and asked to carry tight ends in coverage.
āAwesome instincts in the middle of the field allowed him to live around the football.
āHips and feet show up as special in coverage. He can turn and run in-phase with tight ends.
āFluid, smooth mover whether he's running down a ball-carrier or backpedaling in coverage.
āTiming and instincts as a blitzer allowed him to have a huge impact.
NEGATIVES
āOne-year wonder who was banged up prior to 2017.
āCan play tall at times with stiff knees.
āDurability concerns were mentioned by scouts given his injury history.
āNot always an effective stacker of blocks and must better use his length to stay clean.
OVERALL
A former basketball standout in high school, Leighton Vander Esch is one of the best all-around defenders in the class. He's also still developing physically on an already dominant frame. Whether he's playing in a 4-3 or 3-4 scheme, Vander Esch looks like a Day 1 starter.
GRADE: 7.05 (Round 1)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Luke Kuechly, Carolina Panthers
2. Roquan Smith, Georgia
34 of 35
POSITIVES
āInstinctive, rangy linebacker prospect with speed to dominate outside the hashes.
āExcellent work ethic and considered a leader of the Georgia program. Ideal captain of the defense.
āHe'll leave running backs sore with powerful, consistent tackling. Shows the ability to wrap up and not let runners slip.
āHas the speed and hips to play in coverage against tight ends or backs. His timing and instincts in coverage are special.
āTrue three-down impact at linebacker with excellent speed, instincts and timing.
āHas the agility of a running back and can start, stop, accelerate and flip his hips.
NEGATIVES
āAdded weight to his frame for the combine but is still undersized by NFL standards (6'1", 236 lbs).
āStruggled at times against power-run teams (Oklahoma, Alabama) and failed to show up early in thoseĀ games.
āIf he gets behind the play in the run game, he'll get swallowed by blockers.
āCould better learn to stack and shed blockers.
OVERALL
Roquan Smith is the ideal 4-3 Mike linebacker with speed and instincts but could also end up as a weak-side linebacker where he's free to make plays in space. He's been compared by some scouts to Ray Lewis or NaVorro Bowman, which speaks to his excellent overall ability.
GRADE: 7.10 (Round 1)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Thomas Davis, Carolina Panthers
1. Tremaine Edmunds, Virginia Tech
35 of 35
POSITIVES
āBig, fluid, fast linebacker with three-down skill set and versatility to rush, stop the run or play in coverage.
āLegacy player whose dad, Ferrell, played tight end in the NFL.
āHas the frame to add size if so desired and could ultimately end up as an edge-rusher or stack linebacker.
āSize and speed are rare. He's able to run with wide receivers and chase down running backs at 250 pounds.
āCan be a defensive chess piece that matches up with the offense's best player. He's agile and fast enough to play slot coverage but long and powerful enough to rush off the edge.
āHas the body type to be developed into any role the defense imagines.
āJust 19 years old with a whole lot of time ahead of him to grow and develop.
NEGATIVES
āStill learning the position and will take false steps that his athleticism covers up.
āCan be late to react and is more of a catcher than initiator as a tackler.
āNeeds to continue getting stronger to take on NFL blockers.
OVERALL
The sky's the limit for Tremaine Edmunds, and the only thing holding him back might be the creativity of his defensive coordinator. Players with this size, speed, strength and natural ability don't come around often. One scout we spoke to even compared him to a young Brian Urlacher.
GRADE: 7.25 (Round 1)
PRO PLAYER COMPARISON: Anthony Barr, Minnesota Vikings
.jpg?w=2560)

.jpg?w=2560)





.jpg?w=2560)
.jpg?w=2560)