NBA Free Agents 2012: Why the Golden State Warriors Should Avoid Jordan Hill
On June 30, reports surfaced from the San Jose Mercury News that the Golden State Warriors had some interest in signing unrestricted free-agent Jordan Hill.
You might remember Hill from the 2009 NBA draft, which was the last time the Warriors took a long look at him. Fortunately, Golden State wised up and selected Stephen Curry with the No. 7 pick that year. Hill went with the very next selection to the New York Knicks and has done nothing but disappoint ever since.
The Warriors dodged the Jordan Hill bullet once. Letโs hope they can do it again.
TOP NEWS

Knicks Reveal New Security Procedure

New Mock with AD Trade ๐ก

Grades For Every Finals Starter ๐
Sure, Hillโs got some sizeโheโs 6โ10โ. And heโs relatively young at just 24 years old. But size and youth are just about all the former Arizona Wildcat has going for him.
Hill defendersโif they existโwould point to Hillโs cameo appearance in last yearโs playoffs, where he averaged 4.8 points and 6.3 rebounds in just 18.1 minutes per game for the Los Angeles Lakers. In case thereโs any confusion, those are the best numbers of Hillโs career.
And letโs also remember that Hill accumulated those underwhelming career-highs as his rookie contract was expiring. Having bounced between three teams in as many seasons, Hill was playing for his basketball life. With his career hanging in the balance, the best he could muster was 4.8 points and 6.3 rebounds.
How much worse will those numbers be if heโs got some financial security? For the Warriorsโ sake, letโs hope we never find out.
And if you think taking a small playoff sample and using it to judge Hill harshly is unfair, we can look deeper. But be warned, itโs not going to be pretty.
First of all, Hill is an awful defensive player. Heโs too weak to hold position in the post, which results in an astronomically high foul rateโHill commits a foul every 7.2 minutes, eighth-worst among power forwards.
He consistently allows opposing bigs to overpower him. And the bigger the opponent, the worse Hill performs. Take last season as an example: In 2011-2012, Hillโs PER (player efficiency rating) was 15.80. In contrast, Hill allowed opposing power forwards to accumulate PERs of 18.7. Centers performed even better, racking up a total of 20.4. On the boards, Hill was 40thย among power forwards in defensive rebounding.
So, to put it simply, Hill is a detriment to his teamโnot an asset. And the Warriors are in desperate need of toughness, defense and rebounding. Hill comes up short in all three areas.
How about the financial side?
For the Warriors, who admittedly need support behind David Lee and Andrew Bogut on the front line, signing Hill would also be a financial disaster. Why? Because heading into next season, the Warriors are essentially capped-out. The only way Golden State can acquire new talent without trading for it is to use their mid-level exception.
That means they can sign one free agent. Thatโs it. And itโll cost them about $5 million bucks.
Jordan Hill is not the guy the Warriors need. Itโs actually unclear if heโs the guy anyone needs. But since the Warriors only get one shot at free agency this offseason, theyโve got to be especially careful with their money.
Hopefully, this situation will end the same way it did when the Warriors last showed interest in Jordan Hillโฆwith Golden State shrewdly passing him up for a better option.



.png)


