Do the Bears Need a New QB?
Short answer: no.Ā
I feel the need to discuss the Bears quarterback situation in more detail. Those of you who read my "Bears Draft Needs" article would notice that I didnāt mention the drafting of a young quarterback.
Thereās a misconception amongst Chicago fans that all we need is to get a good quarterback. While a consistent, mistake free passer is optimal, a team needs more than that to succeed.
TOP NEWS

Geno Explains Wilson Exchange
.jpg?w=2560)
Mahomes Told Teammate to Leave Meeting
.jpg?w=2560)
Rodgers Iced Out on Plane š
No quarterback, whether drafted or acquired via free agency, can come into training camp and become the franchise QB for the Chicago Bears.Ā
Now people (read: idiots) will say things like, āLook at Atlanta and Baltimore. They drafted a quarterback and theyāre winning. Why canāt we have that?ā Well, it takes more than a quarterback to change a team, and while both Matt Ryan and Joe Flacco have played well in their respective roles, theyāre an important part of a bigger picture.
Hereās a taste of what the Falcons and Ravens did to help turn their teams around.
Atlanta
- Hired a new head coach, Mike Smith.
- Signed a franchise running back, Michael Turner (finished second in rushing).
- Had receivers who could get open and catch balls.
- Drafted Matt Ryan (limited turnovers and stayed healthy).
- They had a pass rushāJohn Abraham had 16.5 sacks.
Baltimore
- Hired a new coach, John Harbaugh.
- Two running backs rushed for 650+ yards (Willis McGahee and Le'Ron McClain).
- Featured a top-ranked defense who didnāt just sit around saying, āwe can play better.ā
- Drafted Joe Flacco, who started slow but thanks to the defense didnāt have to win every game for his team.
As you can see, there are a few things that needed to happen in order to turn things around. Quite frankly Kyle Orton showed, before his injury, that heās capable of being the mistake-limiting passer the Bears need.
However, after the injury he was even more limited in his mobility and wasnāt able to hit the open receiver. To put it plainly, he didnāt play well, but hereās where a team needs to come together and make up for its own shortcomings, which didnāt happen.
The offensive line allowed more pressure to be put on Orton and limited the effectiveness of Matt Forte. Bears receivers couldnāt get open consistently (Devin Hester, which means that heās drawing double teams, which isnāt necessarily a bad thing), and when they did get open, they dropped the ball (Rashied Davis, Marty Booker).
Add to that the utter lack of a pass rush (Tommie Harris is the leader of that line and shoulders most of the blame) and a banged-up secondary, and no quarterback could play well enough to overcome those odds.
Case in point, Drew Brees: He played phenomenally all season, but his team didnāt rise to the occasion, and they missed the playoffs. Jay Cutler is another good exampleāvoted into the Pro Bowl, but because his team couldnāt stop opposing teams from scoring, the Broncos missed the playoffs.Ā
Both young quarterbacks (Flacco, Ryan) and old quarterbacks (Gus Frerotte, Kerry Collins) played smart enough to help their teams win. However, with all of those teams you can see areas where the Bears need to improveābetter offensive line play, a pass rush, sure-handed receivers, and then you can talk about the quarterback.Ā
The Bears have the players to become a complete team; they just need to show it.
Getting the attitude of āwe can play betterā to actually playing better will depend on the coaching staff lighting a fire under the entire team from the outset of training camp.

.jpg?w=2560)


.jpg?w=2560)
.jpg?w=2560)