College Football SRS Rankings: Bowl Picks against the Spread
With Navy over Army, my ATS picks have moved to 12-8 (60%). Now time for the bowl picks! As one would expect, not a whole lot has changed over one game, so I’m only showing the rankings for reference.
As of December 12th, 2010, the conference rankings are as follows, with last week’s ranking in parentheses and conferences/divisions in bold if they’ve changed from last week:
17. MAC East (17)
16. MAC West (15)
15. C-USA East (16)
14. Sun Belt (14)
13. C-USA West (13)
12. Big East (12)
11. WAC (11)
10. MWC (10)
9. ACC Atlantic (8)
8. ACC Coastal (9)
7. Pac-10 (7)
6. Big Ten (6)
5. Independents (4)
4. SEC East (5)
3. Big 12 North (3)
2. SEC West (2)
1. Big 12 South (1)
| Team | W-L | Last Week | Last Game | Quality Wins | Losses |
25. | Florida | (7-5) | 25 | BYE | @Tennessee | @Alabama LSU Mississippi St South Carolina @Florida St |
24. | Virginia Tech | (11-2) | 24 | BYE | @North Carolina St @Miami (FL) | Boise St FCS |
23. | Texas Tech | (7-5) | 23 | BYE | @Colorado | Texas @Iowa St Oklahoma St @Texas A&M @Oklahoma |
22. | Florida St | (9-4) | 22 | BYE | @Miami (FL) @Maryland Florida | @Oklahoma @North Carolina St North Carolina (N)Virginia Tech |
21. | Baylor | (7-5) | 21 | BYE | @Colorado @Texas | @Texas Tech @TCU @Oklahoma State Texas A&M Oklahoma |
20. | Nevada | (12-1) | 20 | BYE | None | @Hawaii |
19. | Utah | (10-2) | 19 | BYE | None | TCU @Notre Dame |
18. | Mississippi State | (8-4) | 18 | BYE | @Florida | Auburn @LSU @Alabama Arkansas |
17. | Boise St | (11-1) | 17 | BYE | @Virginia Tech | @Nevada |
16. | Wisconsin | (11-1) | 16 | BYE | @Iowa | @Michigan St |
15. | Ohio St | (11-1) | 15 | BYE | @Illinois @Iowa | @Wisconsin |
14. | South Carolina | (9-4) | 14 | BYE | Alabama @Florida @Clemson | @Auburn @Kentucky Arkansas (N)Auburn |
13. | Alabama | (9-3) | 13 | BYE | @Arkansas Florida @Tennessee
| @South Carolina @LSU Auburn |
12. | TCU | (12-0) | 12 | BYE | @Utah | None |
11. | Michigan St | (11-1) | 11 | BYE | @Penn St | @Iowa |
10. | LSU | (10-2) | 10 | BYE | @Florida | @Auburn @Arkansas |
9. | Texas A&M | (9-3) | 9 | BYE | Oklahoma @Baylor Nebraska | @Oklahoma St Arkansas Missouri |
8. | Stanford | (11-1) | 8 | BYE | @Notre Dame @Washington | @Oregon |
7. | Oregon | (12-0) | 7 | BYE | @Tennessee @USC | None |
6. | Missouri | (10-2) | 6 | BYE | @Texas A&M Oklahoma | @Nebraska @Texas Tech |
5. | Nebraska | (10-3) | 5 | BYE | @Washington @Kansas St @Oklahoma State | Texas @Texas A&M @Oklahoma |
4. | Oklahoma State | (10-2) | 4 | BYE | Texas A&M @Texas Tech @Kansas St @Texas | Nebraska Oklahoma |
3. | Oklahoma | (11-2) | 3 | BYE | @Baylor @Oklahoma St Nebraska | @Missouri @Texas A&M |
2. | Arkansas | (10-2) | 2 | BYE | @Georgia @Texas A&M @South Carolina | Alabama @Auburn |
1. | Auburn | (13-0) | 1 | BYE | South Carolina @Kentucky @Alabama (N)South Carolina | None |
My College Football Playoff Preference
The detractors of a playoff indicate that the reasons they don’t like a playoff is that there would be too many games included in the season, and it would be hard to transport as many people as would be needed to each and every neutral site game. So to solve this, the playoff needs to let a minimum number of teams in and only hold a few of the games at a neutral site.
Make it like the NIT tournament. Each of the higher seeded teams gets home games until the final four. Also, in order to give everyone a chance, invite only conference champions. That would be 11 teams, and in order to make it an even number, I’m okay with one wild card. I’ve been told that a lot of people want 16. So given that, let’s take the Current Standings and choose our 16 schools.
ACC—Virginia Tech
Big XII—Oklahoma
Big East—Connecticut
Big Ten—Wisconsin
C-USA—UCF
MAC—Miami (OH)
MWC—TCU
Pac-10—Oregon
SEC—Auburn
Sun Belt—Florida International
WAC—Nevada
Wild Card—Stanford
Wild Card—Ohio St
Wild Card—Arkansas
Wild Card—Michigan St
Wild Card—LSU
Taking these 16 schools, I’d then seed them by conference strength (using ESPN’s Conference Rankings).
- Auburn
- Oklahoma
- Wisconsin
- Oregon
- Nevada
- TCU
- Virginia Tech
- Connecticut
- UCF
- Miami (OH)
- Florida International
- Stanford
- Ohio State
- Arkansas
- Michigan St.
- LSU
In this scenario, the first round of games would be (I have road teams winning in bold):
LSU Auburn | Michigan St Oklahoma | Arkansas Wisconsin | Ohio St Oregon |
Stanford Nevada | Florida International TCU | Miami (OH) Virginia Tech | UCF Connecticut |
I’d take the worst teams and send them the best teams like in the NFL. The next round (again winning road teams in bold):
Arkansas Auburn | Stanford Oklahoma | Connecticut Oregon | Virginia Tech TCU |
That would leave us with a Final Four of Saturday-Sunday Contests at a Neutral Site:
TCU Auburn | Oregon Oklahoma |
With a Final of:
Oklahoma Auburn |
What if you take the eight best conference champions and put them into a playoff? If any independent teams were ranked higher than the eighth, seventh or even sixth-best conference’s champion, we could put those teams in instead of the conference champions. This would be more dynamic than what is currently being given to us (separating the Non-AQs from the AQs). The problem right now is there is no assumption of change. That’s what is making social security bankrupt—not indexing to the average age of death. Anyway, under this scenario, you’d have:
- Auburn
- Oklahoma
- Wisconsin
- Oregon
- Nevada
- TCU
- Virginia Tech
- Navy (better than Connecticut)
Navy Auburn | Virginia Tech Oklahoma | TCU Wisconsin | Nevada Oregon |
With the final four neutral site games and final being:
Oregon Auburn | Wisconsin Oklahoma |
With the final being:
Oklahoma Auburn |
Playoff Dreams are fun, too bad you have to wake up.
Predictions for Army-Navy Game (1-0 last week, 12-8 ATS overall)
BYU -9 over UTEP
Fresno State +3 over Northern Illinois
Troy +2.5 over Ohio
Southern Miss -2.5 over Louisville
Utah +15 over Boise St
Navy +2.5 over San Diego St
Hawaii -8 over Tulsa
Toledo -5 over Florida International
Air Force -2.5 over Georgia Tech
North Carolina St +4 over West Virginia
Missouri -3 over Iowa
Maryland -8 over East Carolina
Baylor -2 over Illinois
Oklahoma St -7 over Arizona
SMU -7.5 over Army
Kansas St (PK) over Syracuse
North Carolina (PK) over Tennessee
Nebraska -14 over Washington
South Florida +4.5 over Clemson
Miami (FL) (PK) over Notre Dame
Georgia -6 over Central Florida
South Carolina -2.5 over Florida St
Texas Tech -11.5 over Northwestern
Michigan St +7 over Alabama
Florida -5 over Penn St
Mississippi St -5 over Michigan
TCU (PK) over Wisconsin
Oklahoma -17 over Connecticut
Stanford -3 over Virginia Tech
Arkansas +2.5 over Ohio St
Miami (OH) -3 over Middle Tennessee St
Texas A&M (PK) over LSU
Kentucky +3 over Pittsburgh
Nevada -9 over Boston College
Auburn -2.5 over Oregon
How the SRS Rankings Are Created
First, the easy one: The whole point of me starting a ranking system 15 years ago was to remove any and all bias (that’s what they all say). The only teams I might have any sort of bias towards are the small Boise States of the world (no, I don’t have them No. 1) or my favorite team, Fresno State (not ranked).
I’ve tried to come up with the rationale that every sports announcer I’ve ever heard brings up: Conference rankings (check), Road vs. Away (check) and who you played (double-check).
As I said before, I’ve been doing this privately for over 15 years, and every year there have been slight changes to it. Usually by the end of the season, I see more improvements I can make, and I do that for the following season. By no stretch is it perfect, but I think it’s getting there.
So what are the specifics? It starts by generating a ranking for each conference. This is done by generating a win-loss record for each conference against the other conferences. For the purpose of this system, I consider each division a conference (for example, the SEC West is a conference—so are the independents).
This is modified by determining who those wins are against. For example, the Big Ten loses some of its power by scheduling lots of MAC teams. I take the total and divide it by how many teams are in the conference to normalize the value, and then take a ranking of that value.
After determining the conference rankings, I generate values that a team would receive for playing another team. Values are generated for a Home Win, a Home Loss, a Road Win and a Road Loss.
Each of the values is derived from the Home Win, which is formed by taking the team's place in the conference (first, second, third, etc.), inverting it so more points are awarded for beating the team and multiplying it by the inverse conference ranking. This is then normalized again for the number of teams in the conference.
For example, if the first place team in the first place conference is Alabama, and Arkansas beats Alabama, they will earn 102 points. This is because Alabama was in first place ( inverse = 7 multiplied by inverse conference ranking = 17, 7 * 17 = 102).
Losses are similar, though there is no inverting. Thus an Arkansas loss will only cause them to lose two points (Place in Conference = 1, Conference Rank = 1, 1 * 1 = 1). I added an additional modifier of two if you lose at home, so 1 * 2 = 2. A Road Win is the same as a Home Win, except the value is multiplied by two, and a Road Loss takes the Home Loss and divides it by two.
Did you follow all of that? If not, don’t worry about it; just know that it is under constant improvement, and again, this is where I think they will be if they continue to do what they did last year.

.jpg)







