SRS: New Team in the Top 5! Who Is It? Also, Auburn Falls From #2!
TCU’s victories don’t nearly look as impressive these days. That could open things up for Boise State, particularly since they finish with two decent teams (Fresno State and Nevada) while TCU finishes with…New Mexico. Ouch!
All of my locks are still in tact—were there any doubts? Mississippi State did not keep it close against Alabama, though Nevada-Fresno State and USC-Arizona proved—at least temporarily—that I’m not insane. Both of my upsets were close until they ran out of steam. And lots of people are still questioning the “Quality Wins” feature of the column.
Keep in mind people that the Quality Wins feature is not how the SRS measures things. It’s actually quite the opposite. SRS measures results, then I can look at what victories mattered to the SRS.
TCU, last week, had no quality victories, yet were still 12th. That means they must have a lot of good, solid, victories, just nothing that was a huge swing in points like Quality Wins are supposed to do. Keep that in mind when looking through things.
Lastly, the results from last week’s poll confirms what I had already thought, 10% of the top team’s score is plenty low enough to be considered a “Quality Win”. I’d think about going higher, but that would weed out even more.
As of Nov. 14, 2010, the conference rankings are as follows, with last week’s ranking in parenthesis and conferences/divisions in bold if they’ve changed from last week:
17. MAC East (17)
16. MAC West (16)
15. Sun Belt (15)
14. C-USA East (14)
13. C-USA West (13)
12. Big East (12)
11. MWC (11)
10. WAC (10)
9. ACC Coastal (9)
8. Pac-10 (5)
7. ACC Atlantic (7)
6. Big Ten (6)
5. Independents (8)
4. SEC East (4)
3. Big 12 North (3)
2. SEC West (2)
1. Big 12 South (1)
| Team | W-L | Last Week | Last Game | Quality Wins | Losses |
25. | Iowa | (7-3) | 24 | L @ Northwestern | @Michigan Michigan St | @Arizona Wisconsin @Northwestern |
24. | Ohio St | (9-1) | -- | W vs. Penn State | None | @Wisconsin |
23. | Texas Tech | (5-5) | 25 | L @ Oklahoma | @Colorado @Missouri | Texas @Iowa St Oklahoma St @Texas A&M @Oklahoma |
22. | Miami (FL) | (7-3) | 18 | W @ Georgia Tech | @Pittsburgh @Georgia Tech | @Ohio St Florida St @Virginia |
21. | Hawaii | (7-3) | 22 | BYE | @Army | USC @Colorado @Boise St |
20. | Baylor | (7-4) | 17 | L vs. Texas A&M | @Colorado @Texas | @Texas Tech @TCU @Oklahoma State Texas A&M |
19. | Nevada | (9-1) | -- | W @ Fresno State | None | @Hawaii |
18. | Florida | (6-4) | 16 | L vs. South Carolina | None | @Alabama LSU Mississippi St South Carolina |
17. | Texas A&M | (7-3) | -- | W @ Baylor | @Baylor | @Oklahoma St Arkansas Missouri |
16. | Stanford | (9-1) | 13 | W @ Arizona State | None | @Oregon |
15. | Wisconsin | (9-1) | 8 | W vs. Indiana | @Iowa | @Michigan St |
14. | Oklahoma | (6-2) | 14 | W vs. Texas Tech | (N) Texas | @Missouri @Texas A&M |
13. | Mississippi State | (7-3) | 9 | L @ Alabama | @Florida | Auburn @LSU @Alabama |
12. | TCU | (11-0) | 12 | W vs. San Diego St | @Utah | None |
11. | Michigan St | (9-1) | 19 | BYE | Wisconsin @Michigan @Northwestern | @Iowa |
10. | Boise St | (9-0) | 10 | W @ Idaho | @Virginia Tech | None |
9. | Oregon | (10-0) | 6 | W @ Cal | @USC | None |
8. | Alabama | (8-2) | 11 | W vs. Mississippi St | @Arkansas Florida
| @South Carolina @LSU |
7. | South Carolina | (7-3) | -- | W @ Florida | Alabama @Florida | @Auburn @Kentucky Arkansas |
6. | LSU | (9-1) | 4 | W vs. ULM | @Florida Alabama | @Auburn |
5. | Oklahoma State | (9-1) | 5 | W @ Texas | Texas A&M @Kansas St @Texas | Nebraska |
4. | Missouri | (8-2) | 7 | W @ Kansas State | @Texas A&M @Kansas St | @Nebraska @Texas Tech |
3. | Auburn | (11-0) | 2 | W vs. Georgia | South Carolina @Kentucky LSU | None |
2. | Arkansas | (8-2) | 3 | W @ South Carolina | @Georgia @Texas A&M @South Carolina | Alabama @Auburn |
1. | Nebraska | (9-1) | 1 | W vs. Kansas | @Kansas St @Oklahoma State Missouri | Texas |
My college football playoff preference:
The detractors of a playoff indicate that the reasons they don’t like a playoff is that there would be too many games included in the season, and it would be hard to transport as many people as would be needed to each and every neutral site game.
So to solve this, the playoff needs to let a minimum number of teams in as possible, and only have a few of the games be at a neutral site game. My thoughts are: Make it like the NIT tournament, each of the higher seeded teams get home games until the final four.
Also, in order to give everyone a chance, have only conference champions invited. That gives us 11 teams, and in order to make it an even number, I’m okay with one “wild card”. I’ve been told that a lot of people want 16. So given that, let’s take the Current Standings and choose our 16 schools.
ACC—Virginia Tech
Big XII—Nebraska
Big East—Pittsburgh
Big Ten—Michigan St
C-USA—UCF
MAC—Northern Illinois
MWC—TCU
Pac-10—Oregon
SEC—Auburn
Sun Belt—Florida International
WAC—Boise St
Wild Card—LSU
Wild Card—Stanford
Wild Card—Wisconsin
Wild Card—Ohio St
Wild Card—Oklahoma St
Taking these 16 schools, I’d then seed them by conference strength (Using ESPN’s Conference Rankings).
- Auburn
- Michigan St
- Oregon
- Nebraska
- TCU
- Boise St
- Virginia Tech
- Pittsburgh
- UCF
- Northern Illinois
- Florida International
- LSU
- Stanford
- Wisconsin
- Ohio St
- Oklahoma St
In this scenario, the first round of games would be (I have road teams winning in bold):
Oklahoma St Auburn | Ohio St Michigan St | Wisconsin Oregon | Stanford Nebraska |
LSU TCU | Florida International Boise St | Northern Illinois Virginia Tech | UCF Pittsburgh |
I’d take the worst teams and send them the best teams like the NFL. The next round (again winning road teams in bold):
Pittsburgh Auburn | Virginia Tech Michigan St | Boise St Oregon | TCU Nebraska |
That would leave us with a Final Four Saturday-Sunday Contests in a Neutral Site to be:
Nebraska Auburn | Oregon Michigan St |
With a Final of:
Nebraska Oregon |
Playoff Dreams are fun, too bad you have to wake up.
Predictions for Week 11
Locks (12-0)
Alabama over Georgia St
Nevada over New Mexico St
LSU over Mississippi
Great Games (Average Margin of Victory out of 10 games: 12.9)
Did a little better this week. Mississippi State didn’t help with their 20 point embarrassment. However, Fresno State and USC showed up to make it a little more respectable.
Oklahoma @ Baylor
Arkansas @ Mississippi St
Florida St. @ Maryland
Upsets (if any) (2-5)
Both upset picks were close until the end, but close does not cut it. Every week, I think, “This is going to be the week that no upsets will be predicted,” but alas…
Iowa over Ohio St
Baylor over Oklahoma
Maryland over Florida St
So how are the SRS rankings created?
First, the easy one: The whole point of me starting a ranking system 15 years ago was to remove any and all bias (that’s what they all say). The only teams I might have any sort of bias towards are the small Boise States of the world (no, I don’t have them No. 1) or my favorite team, Fresno State (not ranked).
I’ve tried to come up with the rationale that every sports announcer I’ve ever heard brings up: Conference rankings (check), Road vs. Away (check), and teams played (double-check).
As I said before, I’ve been doing this privately for over 15 years, and every year there have been slight changes to it. Usually by the end of the season, I see more improvements I can make, and I do that for the following season. By no stretch is it perfect, but I think it’s getting there.
So what are the specifics? It starts by generating a ranking for each conference. This is done by generating a win-loss record for each conference against the other conferences. For the purpose of this system, I consider each division a conference (for example, the SEC West is a conference—so are the independents).
This is modified by determining who those wins are against. For example, the Big Ten loses some of its power by scheduling lots of MAC teams. I take the total and divide it by how many teams are in the conference to normalize the value, and then take a ranking of that value.
After determining the conference rankings, I generate values that a team would receive for playing another team. Values are generated for a Home Win, a Home Loss, a Road Win, and a Road Loss.
Each of the values is derived from the Home Win, which is formed by taking the team's place in the conference (first, second, third, etc.), inverting it so more points are awarded for beating the team, and multiplying it by the inversed conference ranking. This is then normalized again for the number of teams in the conference.
For example, if the first place team in the first place conference is Alabama, and Arkansas beats Alabama, they will earn 102 points. This is because Alabama was in first place (inversed = 7 multiplied by inversed conference ranking = 17, 7 * 17 = 102).
Losses are similar, though there is no inverting. Thus an Arkansas loss will only cause them to lose two points (Place in Conference = 1, Conference Rank = 1, 1 * 1 = 1). I added an additional modifier of two if you are lost at home, so 1 * 2 = 2. A Road Win is the same as a home win, except the value is multiplied by two, and a Road Loss takes the Home Loss and divides it by two.

.jpg)







