
Latest Stock Watch for 2026 Men's NCAA Tournament Bubble Teams
With just days remaining until the first games of Championship Week, the top 32 or so teams in men's college basketball are merely jockeying for seeding in the NCAA tournament field at this point.
Beyond those locks to dance, though, lie the shifting sands of the bubble.
One strong week can take a team from the wrong side of the projected cut line and vault them all the way up to a single-digit seed.
One disappointing week can make an equal but opposite impact on a team's dreams of making the field.
And in the past seven days, there sure was quite a bit of moving and shaking in this tumultuous territory.
Our "Stock Up" teams aren't necessarily in the projected field, nor are the "Stock Down" teams necessarily in a position of needing to play their way back into the picture. Moreover, not every bubble team will be part of today's conversation. We're just focused on those who have done the most good/bad for their resume over the past week.
Teams are presented in no particular order, aside from alternating between Stock Up and Stock Down.
Unless otherwise noted, all stats and metrics are current through the start of play on Sunday.
Stock Up: Georgia Bulldogs
1 of 8
Resume: 19-8, NET: 33, RES: 34.3, QUAL: 39.3
Past Week: W at Kentucky, W vs. Texas
Georgia entered the week as our last team in the projected field, and even that wasn't going to be the case until I realized that UGA's road win over Missouri probably ought to be enough of a tiebreaker to make the Bulldogs last team in and the Tigers the first team out.
Regardless, after losing five out of six games—four of them by a margin of at least 15 points, no less—Georgia had gone from "comfortably in the field" to "more bubbly than champagne," really needing a strong finish to make it back to the dance for a second straight year.
So far, so good on that front.
First, the Dawgs went into Rupp Arena, drained 14 triples and dropped 86 points on Kentucky to secure their best win of the season.
They proceeded to average 1.47 points per possession in a critical home win over Texas, arguably leapfrogging the Longhorns in the process. It got dicey there for a minute when Texas reeled off a quick 15-2 run midway through the second half to tie the game, but Georgia scored on seemingly every possession from that point forward to surge into the projected field with a bit of a cushion.
Georgia is now 10-7 vs. Quads 1 and 2 with three such games remaining, as well as a Quad 3 home game against South Carolina. A 2-2 finish would almost certainly do the trick, provided this isn't a repeat of 2024 with all of the bid thieves during Championship Week. If they were to beat the Gamecocks but lose the other three against Vanderbilt, Alabama and Mississippi State, it would be a photo finish.
Stock Down: Clemson Tigers
2 of 8
Resume: 20-8, NET: 38, RES: 36.7, QUAL: 34.7
Past Week: L at Wake Forest, L vs. Florida State
Two weeks ago, Clemson was 20-4 overall, 10-1 in the ACC and in fantastic shape for a trip to the dance.
In fact, with a good enough run through the then-upcoming stretch of three games, the Tigers easily could have played their way into the mix for a spot in Saturday's top 16 reveal.
To put it lightly, though, it wasn't a good enough run.
The Tigers have dropped four consecutive games, three of the four to teams not projected to make the NCAA tournament and two of those three at home.
The home loss to Florida State on Saturday was easily Clemson's worst misstep of the season, even though the Seminoles have been red hot over the past five weeks. That was a Quad 3 loss until the overnight NET refresh brought FSU up from No. 85 to No. 74.
Taking that L in the same week as a loss to Wake Forest was brutal, dropping Clemson down onto the bubble and possibly needing a win over either Louisville or North Carolina in the next 10 days.
At the moment, they have a 10-8 record against Quads 1-2, which is solid compared to a lot of the bubble. They are also still No. 41 or better in all of the metrics, which helps keep them in the field with some room to spare.
But their best win of the season was probably the overtime, neutral-site game against Georgia, who, again, we had as our last team in the projected field one week ago. Clemson also now has four losses to teams that most likely won't be dancing.
If they lose both games to the Cardinals and Tar Heels to slip to 10-10 vs. Q1/Q2 with nothing close to an elite win on the docket, things are going to get iffy in a hurry.
Stock Up: Texas A&M Aggies
3 of 8
Resume: 19-8, NET: 42, RES: 41.7, QUAL: 32.7
Past Week: W vs. Ole Miss, W at Oklahoma
Neither of Texas A&M's wins in the past week was instantly any sort of resume-changer. The home win over Ole Miss goes down as a Quad 3 result, while the win at Oklahoma narrowly qualifies as a Quad 1 victory.
All the same, it was a huge week for the Aggies, who simply needed to stop the bleeding after opening February with four consecutive losses.
They almost didn't, though. A&M had to claw back from a 13-point deficit midway through the second half against the Rebels, winning by three by ending the game on a 9-0 run. The Sooners also had about half a dozen chances to tie the game in the final three minutes on Saturday, but the Aggies managed to prevail yet again.
They do now have four Quad 1 wins and a respectable 8-8 record against Quads 1 and 2. Moreover, they have three wins against the projected field (at Auburn, at Georgia, at Texas) and just one loss to a team not currently projected to dance (at Oklahoma State, seven days into the season).
Can they hang on, though?
The Aggies have one huge game remaining, at Arkansas on Wednesday, as well as three fringe Q1/Q2 games—vs. Texas, vs. Kentucky, at LSU.
If that 8-8 record against the top two Quads turns into 8-12, adios Aggies. But even one win down the stretch would probably put them smack dab on the bubble cut line heading into the SEC tournament.
Stock Down: San Diego State Aztecs
4 of 8
Resume: 18-8, NET: 44, RES: 52.0, QUAL: 47.7
Past Week: L vs. Grand Canyon, L at Colorado State
Heading into the final six games of the regular season, San Diego State was already on extremely shaky ground with a tough road ahead.
All of the metrics had the Aztecs in the 40s, but with a bad home loss to Troy and a singular Quad 1 win at Nevada that isn't exactly a bright feather in the cap.
More than anything, it was the combination of a solid Quad 2 record (5-1), a limited pile of overall losses (six), a terrible bubble and that inescapable "the Mountain West isn't actually going to be a one-bid league, is it?" feeling that had SDSU in the mix for a bid.
But that house of cards came crashing down amid the back-to-back Quad 2 losses noted above—especially in conjunction with New Mexico winning both of its games and becoming the unofficial second-best candidate out of the MWC.
Here's the good news, though: The Aztecs have three Quad 1 opportunities on tap, hosting Utah State on Wednesday before back-to-back road games against New Mexico and Boise State. If they can win two of those three before also ending the regular season with a home win over UNLV, they figure to have a good-not-great argument for a bid.
However, when a difficult remaining schedule is the good news, you know you're grasping at straws. And even if the Aztecs were to beat Utah State, a loss at UNM could be a fatal blow that pushes the Lobos ahead of them for good.
Stock Up: West Coast Conference Bubble
5 of 8
Saint Mary's Gaels Resume: 25-4, NET: 26, RES: 31.0, QUAL: 31.3
Past Week: W at Seattle, W at Washington State
Santa Clara Broncos Resume: 23-6, NET: 40, RES: 43.0, QUAL: 37.3
Past Week: W at San Francisco
While Gonzaga couldn't survive West Coast Conference play without suffering a loss to a team outside of the top three, it is almost official that both Saint Mary's and Santa Clara are going to do so.
The Gaels already have finished that fight with their pair of road wins this past week. They lost at Santa Clara and at Gonzaga back in January, and all that is left on their regular-season slate are the home rematches of those games.
If they win either one, they're probably going to be in good shape. Beating Gonzaga would do more good for their resume, giving them an upper-echelon win that has been lacking all season. But ending the regular season at 26-5 with only one loss outside of Quad 1—a Quad 2 "neutral" site game against Boise State in Idaho Falls—and what would probably be top 35 metrics across the board would be hard to deny.
Santa Clara does still have a home game left against Oregon State after the game at Saint Mary's. Considering the Broncos won by 38 in Corvallis back at the start of WCC play, though, we like their chances in that one.
At least one more win over Saint Mary's is a must, though, as Santa Clara's resume with a terrible Quad 4 loss to Loyola-Chicago is nowhere near as clean as the Gaels'.
Winning the regular-season one would be better than winning the projected showdown in the WCC semifinals—unless they also plan on securing the auto bid with a championship victory over Gonzaga. Because not only is a road win over the Gaels more valuable than a neutral win over the Gaels, but it would mean one fewer loss on their final resume.
Short of upsetting the Zags, though, these teams have done all we could possibly ask them to do over the past two months. And there is a plausible path to a three-bid WCC because of it.
Stock Down: West Virginia Mountaineers
6 of 8
Resume: 16-11, NET: 64, RES: 63.0, QUAL: 56.3
Past Week: L vs. Utah, L at TCU
West Virginia had crept into the at-large conversation out of seemingly nowhere. Road wins over Arizona State, Cincinnati and UCF weren't individually amazing, but that's a trio of Quad 1 wins to go along with the Mountaineers' previous home victory over Kansas.
Combine those four wins with metrics in the 50s and no losses in Quads 3 or 4 and the 'Eers entered this past week in a boat similar to those of Missouri, Virginia Tech and California, narrowly on the outside looking in.
Unfortunately, WVU's boat has taken on a ton of water in a hurry, taking a Quad 3 home loss to Utah before failing to rally for what would have been a fifth Quad 1 win at TCU.
Neither the Utes nor the Horned Frogs were able to generate much of anything on offense, each averaging exactly one point per possession. But West Virginia shot 10-for-44 (22.7 percent) from three-point range and was out-rebounded by double digits in each game while falling perhaps hopelessly out of the mix for a bid.
If the 'Eers win out from here—finishing at OK State, vs. BYU, at Kansas State, vs. UCF—they have to at least re-enter the at-large debate. However, they would be entering the Big 12 tournament with a slightly worse Wins Above Bubble rating than what got them left out one year ago, so even a 4-0 finish wouldn't guarantee anything at this point.
Stock Up: SMU Mustangs
7 of 8
Resume: 19-8, NET: 30, RES: 33.0, QUAL: 34.7
Past Week: W vs. Louisville, W vs. Boston College
After a heart-breaking loss at Syracuse on Valentine's Day, SMU was really starting to teeter toward the wrong side of the bubble.
The Mustangs looked fantastic back in early January, sitting at 12-2 overall with a home win over North Carolina and a solid neutral-site victory over Texas A&M. But that loss to the Orange was their sixth in 11 games; a sour cherry on a sundae of five consecutive losses to projected tournament teams.
That 95-85 home win over Louisville was one heck of a band-aid, though. Boopie Miller and Jaron Pierre Jr. went for a combined 48 points while 17 Cardinals turnovers paved the way for SMU's best win of the year.
They proceeded to destroy Boston College, as you rather expect a tournament-caliber team to do at home against the Eagles.
They are now firmly back in projected single-digit seed range.
The tricky part now is not blowing it.
The Mustangs have road games remaining against Cal, Stanford and Florida State, as well as a home game against Miami. They are projected as slight favorites in all four of those games on the fringe between Q1 and Q2, and a 2-2 split very likely seals the deal on what would be their first at-large bid since 1993.
A 1-3 finish could be problematic, though, while going 0-4 would probably put them in a position of needing to win the ACC tournament to make the dance.
But things are definitely looking up for the Ponies at the moment.
Stock Down: USC Trojans
8 of 8
Resume: 18-9, NET: 58, RES: 47.3, QUAL: 54.7
Past Week: L vs. Illinois, L vs. Oregon
USC has long been the biggest question mark for seeding purposes, but now the Trojans have quickly become a question mark for selection purposes.
They've been a tricky nut to crack because of all the injuries. Two of their five best wins came back in November when Rodney Rice was available and thriving, but we saw last year with West Virginia that the selection committee will discount big early wins for a team that subsequently lost a star player for the season.
They also didn't get 5-star freshman Alijah Arenas into the mix until late January, added Kam Woods as an immediately-eligible transfer in late December, had to play a few recent games without Chad Baker-Mazara and just haven't ever been anything close to whole.
On Saturday against Oregon, though, the Trojans had all of Arenas, Baker-Mazara and Woods available for a rare full-ish strength game...
And they proceeded to suffer what was easily their worst loss of the season.
Doesn't help matters that it came on the heels of a 36-point shellacking at the hands of Illinois. That's not a bad resume loss, but combine it with the earlier 30-point loss at Michigan and 29-point loss at Michigan State and let's just say that if the proverbial eye test matters at all anymore, USC ain't passing it.
As with San Diego State, the Trojans have the good/bad news of an arduous remaining schedule. They still have two games left against UCLA, a home game against Nebraska and a road game against Washington, otherwise read as three Quad 1 games and a high Quad 2.
They are projected to lose all four, but going 2-2 might be enough to keep/get them on the right side of the cut line—even though it would bring them to just 6-7 overall since getting Arenas into the lineup.

.png)




.jpg)


