NFLNBANHLMLBWNBAWorld CupTennis
Featured Video
Yankees-Red Sox Clear Benches 😳

Eli Manning Needs Plaxico Burress: Fact or Fiction?

Dan BentonMay 22, 2009

Much has been made of Eli Manning's alleged need of Plaxico Burress or a wide receiver with similar size and skill set. After all, the combination had become one of the best in the NFL when they began hooking up on touchdown passes in 2005.

And it's a well known fact that when Eli misses, he misses high...so it's not a reach to assume he needs a tall wide receiver to succeed.

However, if you actually break down the statistics in 2008 and compare Manning's numbers with Burress to his numbers without him, they're not that much different. In fact, an argument could be made that Peyton's younger brother preformed better without his star wide receiver.

TOP NEWS

Panthers 49ers Football

Fantasy Football's Riskiest Picks

Texans Rams Football

CJGJ: Incident Led to HOU Exit

Raiders Crosby Football

NFL star's latest post refuels trade rumors

**The following statistical analysis was done with ESPN's official stats and brucey.net's QB Rating calculator.**

With Plaxico Burress (Weeks 1-3 and 6-11):

164/279 (58.78%) for 1,812 yards with 13 TD's and seven INT's (83.20 QB Rating)

Yards per attempt - 6.49
TD% - 4.66
INT% - 2.50

Without Plaxico Burress (Weeks 5 and 12-17):

125/200 (62.5%) for 1,426 yards with eight TD's and three INT's (90.95 QB Rating)

Yards per attempt - 7.13
TD% - 4.00
INT% - 1.50

Including the playoff loss to Philadelphia:

140/229 (61.1%) for 1,595 yards and eight TD's and five INT's (84.59 QB Rating)

Yards per attempt - 6.97
TD% - 3.49
INT% - 2.18

It's important to note that Manning only played one half in week 17 against the Minnesota Vikings. Had he played the full game, here are his projected stats without Burress and the playoff loss included:

151/248 (60.9%) for 1,714 and eight TD's and five INT's (83.97 QB Rating)

Yards per attempt - 6.91
TD% - 3.23

INT% - 2.01

So what do all of these stats really tell us? Basically, that Manning can succeed without Burress and arguably does better. However, you should also note that his TD percentage was much higher when Burress was playing, but that his INT percentage was also higher...perhaps a sign of him forcing the ball to Plax?

Bottom line? Eli and the Giants don't need Burress to succeed. What they do need is another productive end-zone threat...something I believe Ramses Barden will become almost immediately.

That's that, Giants fans. It's time to take your fingers off the panic button.

Yankees-Red Sox Clear Benches 😳

TOP NEWS

Panthers 49ers Football

Fantasy Football's Riskiest Picks

Texans Rams Football

CJGJ: Incident Led to HOU Exit

Raiders Crosby Football

NFL star's latest post refuels trade rumors

Seahawks Rams Football

Players Primed to Boost FA Value 🤑

Giants Football

NFL's Most Interesting Teams 🧐

Grading Ottawa's 1st-Round Pick 🔠
Bleacher Report14h

Grading Ottawa's 1st-Round Pick 🔠

How the Senators look after taking a long-term gamble 📲

TRENDING ON B/R