Australian Open

Australian Open: Wozniacki Continues to Keep Critics at Bay, Li Na Impresses

MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA - JANUARY 23:  Caroline Wozniacki of Denmark runs into the net after winning match point in her fourth round match against Anastasija Sevastova of Latvia during day seven of the 2011 Australian Open at Melbourne Park on January 23, 2011 in Melbourne, Australia.  (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)
Cameron Spencer/Getty Images
Rajat JainSenior Analyst IJanuary 23, 2011

On paper, the first two fourth-round matches at the Rod Laver Arena could not have been more different.

The first match between Caroline Wozniacki and Anastasija Sevastova was between two lightweight players, both trying to be aggressive and pull the trigger but with not enough firepower to hit winners at will.

The second one featuring Li Na and Victoria Azarenka was big, flat, clean heavy-weight hitting. Every short ball was dispatched with gay abandon, no corners were spared and the stadium echoed with shrieks of both the players—which only increased as the match went on.

And yet, both matches were equally exciting. Sevastova was doing exactly what Cibulkova did in Sydney to beat the world No. 1 and briefly unsettle her in Melbourne.

She was being aggressive right from the start, trying to move Wozniacki from corner to corner, and going for a winner at the first available opportunity.

She even tried to keep Wozniacki honest by approaching the net sporadically and attempting a few drop shots. What ultimately led to her downfall was her inexperience and inconsistency—the same reason why Cibulkova failed in the earlier round.

Time and again, she pulled the trigger a little too early, which resulted in unforced errors or attempted a volley without bending her knees, and drooped the ball at the net.

Her inexperience showed while attempting the drop shots even when Wozniacki was pretty much on the baseline, and opened up the court by not following it up to the net.

In the end, she seemed to have all the tools to upset the counter punching top-ranked Dane except for the consistency and experience.

In a similar way, Azarenka and Li Na looked similar players with heavy, high quality baseline bashing, yet Li Na was doing everything a little better. She moved faster, generated better angles on her two-hander, and was the steadier of the two by committing much fewer unforced errors.

Azarenka just fed to Li’s strengths by providing her enough pace to work with, and lacked variety. Maybe changing the pace through a slice backhand, maybe testing her passing shots by approaching the net, even surprising her with drop shots.

Li Na was comfortable knowing Azarenka’s strengths—and weaknesses—and was clinical on the day.

It is being long said that women's game needs to have players of more variety, with a more complete game. All four ladies in these two games lacked that something.

And this is the reason why the favorites to win the tournament are sitting in the other draws.

This is why, perhaps, Kim Clijsters is being chosen the unanimous favorite. We will have to wait and see if Wozniacki can prove the critics wrong.

Where can I comment?

Stay on your game

Latest news, insights, and forecasts on your teams across leagues.

Choose Teams
Get it on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Real-time news for your teams right on your mobile device.

Download
Copyright © 2017 Bleacher Report, Inc. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved. BleacherReport.com is part of Bleacher Report – Turner Sports Network, part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Network. Certain photos copyright © 2017 Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited. AdChoices