Manuel Almunia: One Mistake Too Many, Time for a Change

(Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

After the defeat to Manchester United, all of those connected to Arsenal pointed the blame at Mike Dean. Dean's officiating was reminiscent of Titus Bramble's Newcastle career. 

For all of Dean's shortcomings, no-one can deny that Manuel Almunia was just as culpable for Arsenal's first defeat of the season. Both goals were conceded because of Almunia, the penalty he conceded was ridiculous, he should have collected Ryan Giggs weak free kick, and instead he stayed on his line as Arsenal relinquished the lead.

Almunia is a good goalkeeper but he is not world class, over the past two seasons, Almunia has been error-prone. Games against Manchester United, Stoke, Tottenham, Newcastle, Celtic, and Portsmouth are examples. 

Rushing out needlessly happened on two previous occasions, Manchester United 2007-2008 season at the Emirates, against Newcastle Almunia conceded a needless penalty, which was saved but none of the incidents should have occurred.

Angles and positioning are very important aspects of goalkeeping. Donati scored an excellent goal, but the angle was so acute Almunia should have saved the shot. David Bentley caught Almunia off his line; this was another goal that should have been saved. There are more examples of Almunia's errors such as Ronaldo's free kick

Almunia does show glimpses of his ability such as the Champions League games against Roma and Manchester United, where he managed to keep Arsenal in the game. 

Lukasz Fabianski has played in some big games last season, most notably Chelsea, where he gifted Chelsea the win. Psychologically, Fabianaski has been damaged severely, games against Tottenham and Chelsea in the three domestic competitions.

Fabianski is a better shot-stopper than Almunia, he comes off his line far more and is rewarded sometimes. However both keepers tend to cave in, in the big games especially. This may sound harsh but Fabianski's best games for Arsenal are the insignificant ones.

His finest performance was against Liverpool where he kept Arsenal in the game, the result may show he conceded four but Liverpool could have scored seven or eight. However, the game against Chelsea demonstrated his biggest weakness and that is his decision making, Kieran Gibbs came to his rescue but that did not prevent Fabianski being found out, Didier Drogba made sure of that.

Overall Fabianski is a better goalkeeper than Almunia, but Almunia has been able to get away with his mistakes, whenever Fabianski makes a mistake it is highlighted extensively. Fabianski could be a match winner if he would adhere to the basic principles of goalkeeping.

The most worrying aspects about the two goalkeepers is that both are experienced. Fabianski is  only 24 but he is experienced for an understudy.  Almunia concerns me the most, at 32 he continues to make silly mistakes that cost Arsenal, by 32 a goalkeeper should know better than to rush out needlessly.

You're currently logged into Facebook

Do you want to share your Bleacher Report activity on Facebook?