5 Reasons Not to Take Adrian Peterson No. 1
The overall consensus around the fantasy football world is that the first name uttered on draft day should be that of Minnesota Vikingsโ running back, Adrian Peterson. In fact, I donโt know if Iโve seen this many people agree on something since the โone urinal of space between menโ rule. Thus, it seems the perfect time to play a little devilโs advocate.
ย
1. No. 3 in 2008
It does seem a bit strange that Peterson appears to be a unanimous choice for that first overall pick, despite the fact that he finished third in fantasy points among running backs last season. I mean, youโd at least think that Michael Turner and DeAngelo Williams would be in the debate, as Williams outscored Peterson by 39 points and Turner by 32. Heck, why arenโt we talking about Matt Forte as the No. 1 selection? After all, the rookie finished just eight points behind Peterson in 2008 and now has a quarterback in Jay Cutler that should help keep defenses a bit more honest.
ย
2. 363 Carries
One of the main arguments to passing on Turner with the No. 1 pick is that the Falconsโ back carried the ball 377 times during the regular season, yet no one seems to be concerned about Petersonโs 363 rushes in 2008. I know there have been studies that have shown that few backs do well following a season in which theyโve rushed the ball 370+ times, but really, did the Vikings save Petersonโs 2009 season by not giving him seven more carries? And, if thatโs the case, where do the 20 carries he got in the playoffs factor in? Do those not count? All Iโm saying is that if Turnerโs durability is going to be questioned because of his 2008 workload, then Petersonโs needs to be to, especially because Peterson had 167 more carries than Turner in 2007.
ย
3. Birk bolted for Baltimore
So, the Vikings have faith in center John Sullivan. Thatโs great; however, it doesnโt negate the fact that they just let a six-time Pro-Bowler go to replace him with a sixth-round pick. Birkโs departure this offseason is something thatโs being overlooked, but it could play a large role in Peterson falling short of the expectations that come with being the No. 1 pick.
ย
4. All Day is All Legs
One of the things that made LT such a fantasy stud was his ability to get points both on the ground and through the air. Peterson, though, is a bit more one-dimensional as the back has just 40 receptions in his two years in the league. Granted, defenses have yet to figure out a way to stop that one-dimension, but it is at least worth thinking about.
ย
5. The Favre Factor
While he refuses to announce his return, everyone and their mothers expect Brett Favre to be wearing the purple and gold of the Vikings next season. Everyone is also assuming the move should help Peterson as teams are more likely to respect the Vikingsโ passing game with Favre, rather than Tarvaris Jackson or Sage Rosenfels, under center.
But, the addition could also have a negative impact on the Vikingsโ stud running back. Yes, Favre will be more of a game manager than game changer, but with the future Hall of Famer taking snaps, the Vikings may be tempted to air things out a bit more than they have in Petersonโs first two years. Add to that the fact that Favre turns the ball over quite a bit (22 INTs in 2008), and Favreโs arrival could lead to fewer opportunities in the long run for Peterson.
ย
Wait, did I just talk myself out of taking Peterson if Iโm so lucky as to secure the first pick of any of my leagueโs drafts? The answer is no.
Yes, the choice isnโt so cut and dry as many would like to make it, but if given the opportunity Iโm going with โAll Day,โ well, all day. Sure, he has question marks, but what running back in the NFL doesnโt?
For more fantasy football insight and advice, click the link below...
ย

.jpg?w=2560)


.jpg?w=2560)



.jpg?w=2560)

