Featured Video
Top Fantasy Performers Through Week 4 ๐Ÿ“ˆ

A Plan For BCS Equity Through A Playoff

Mike In Valdosta
Jul 8, 2009
BigXII vs. SEC

Sugar Bowl

Semifinal 1
Rotating BCS Site
Big East vs. ACC

Orange Bowl


Championship Game
Rotating BCS Site
Big10 vs. Pac10

Rose Bowl

Semifinal 2
Rotating BCS Site
NonBCS* vs. AtLarge**

Fiesta Bowl

ย 

*The Non-BCS conferences form their own organization to determine their entrants into the BCS tournament. They can sell the television rights, etc.

**The pollsters and computers retain their contribution by selecting the At-Large entrant, the highest ranked non-automatic birth as determined by the current BCS ranking process.

ย 

Pros:

  • The current BCS cities and their bowl organizationโ€™s get to keep their game plus an extra game 3 out of 4 years. I cannot see their local chambers of commerce complaining about that.
  • Television gets more programming with less competition. Imagine Semifinal Saturday!
  • Big 10 and Pac 10 get to keep their traditional Rose Bowl match up.
  • Television contract grows. I can see Roy Kramer coming out of retirement to sell this thing to the highest bidder.
  • Participantโ€™s payouts grow as they advance. This means more academic and Title IX funding, or whatever. I am sure the university presidents will have no problem spending it.

Cons:

  • Harm to non-BCS bowls. This argument was also made when the BCS was created. I am not buying it.
  • Season is too long. They have been making this argument for years. Only 4 teams would be required to play extra games with the exception of a play-in system for non-BCS conference champs. Florida played 14 games last year. This system would have required them to play 16 if the 12 game regular season remains. This is a stumbling block due to departments budgeting that twelfth game in indefinitely.
  • Impact on academics, please. If the basketball โ€œstudent-athletesโ€ can do it I believe the football players will manage.
  • Scheduling, starting before Jan 1 would be a big problem because competing with NFL Saturday playoff games in January would have to be addressed.

Conclusion:

Obviously, this is not a comprehensive plan. Please consider it a "Plus 3" from 40,000 feet. I have tried to address the core points made by opponents to a playoff. In my opinion, the institutional opposition is mainly about control and finances. This system allows the BCS conferences to retain control and the lionโ€™s share of the pie. History and tradition, very integral parts of college football, simply cannot be overcome. I would like to point out however, that the Rose Bowl has survived, as has the third Saturday in October. Incremental change has been a constant in college football and the game is stronger than ever. Now, letโ€™s make that last push and finally decide a legitimate champion of the football field.