Andy Roddick: Remembering How to Hope

Rob York by Senior Writer Written on July 06, 2009
WIMBLEDON, ENGLAND - JULY 05:  Andy Roddick of USA waves to the crowd after defeat during the men's singles final match against Roger Federer of Switzerland on Day Thirteen of the Wimbledon Lawn Tennis Championships at the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club on July 5, 2009 in London, England. Federer won 5-7, 7-6, 7-6, 3-6, 16-14.  (Photo by Julian Finney/Getty Images) (Photo by Julian Finney/Getty Images)

Almost three years have passed between the last overhead Roger Federer hit for a winner at the 2006 U.S. Open and the last backhand Andy Murray hit into the net at this year’s Wimbledon.

In the life of a tennis fan, much can change in that length of time.

At the end of 2006, players like Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, Fernando Verdasco, and Robin Soderling weren’t on our radar. Players like Novak Djokovic, Andy Murray, and Juan Martin del Potro didn’t look like Grand Slam contenders.

Rafael Nadal hadn’t experienced the thrill of winning Wimbledon or the frustration of not being able to defend it. Federer was yet to first feel the sting of losing a Wimbledon final or the triumph of winning Roland Garros.

And, in that time, I had forgotten what it meant to be a fan of a player. I knew what it meant to love the game itself and to be a “fan” of all players in the sense that they all had traits I admired and that together they made my favorite sport a proud one.

I preferred to call myself a tennis fan, though, and to root for the results that would bring more glory to the game itself. This was more logical and more satisfying in the long run, and it helped me avoid (most) petty arguments over perspective.

It also meant avoiding hope, and the disappointment that it brings.

Few sports fans know disappointment the way an Andy Roddick fan does. When he caught fire in the summer of 2003, won his first US Open title, and finished No. 1 in the world, we were spoiled.

Federer had won a major, but was not yet using the power of his racket to turn everything he touched into trophies and prize money. Lleyton Hewitt and Marat Safin were slumping.

Nadal was promising, but he was only 17.

After that, times got harder despite the fact that Roddick was almost always improving on, or at least maintaining, the level he showed in ‘03. He reached two Wimbledon finals and another at the US Open. He advanced to the Australian Open semis three times. He led the United States to a Davis Cup win, and this year he will most likely finish in the top 10 for the eighth straight year.

That would tie him with Boris Becker, Bjorn Borg, and John McEnroe.

That would put him one ahead of Mats Wilander.

And yet, being a Roddick fan meant regularly having to hang your head and hope that Federer wouldn’t stand in the way next time.

At Wimbledon, the title Roddick most desires, Federer escaped his grasp in 2004 and outclassed him in 2005. At the US Open, the Swiss took the native son’s best shots in 2006 and 2007 before brushing him aside.

In 2007 and 2009, they met in the Australian semis, and the results there were more unkind than anywhere else.

At some point after Roddick’s last defeat in a major final, I stopped hoping.

I suspected he’d always be there, leading our country in Davis Cup and scoring respectable victories, but for him to win a second major was more than I dared believe in anymore.

Single Page
(15)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

48 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

698
reads

48
comments

written on July 06, 2009 Opinion

The best newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.