Mayweather-Canelo and Pacquiao-Bradley Scoring Fiascos Are CJ Ross' 2 Strikes
Boxing judge C.J. Ross made news Saturday night by being just about the only person in the world who came away from the fight without believing Floyd Mayweather easily outclassed Canelo Alvarez over the course of their 12-round battle in Las Vegas.
Normally, such a thing doesn’t matter. After all, judging a boxing match is a fairly subjective endeavor, and almost everyone watching—people like celebrities, boxing fans and media members—aren’t trained at it.
But Ross is.
Ross, of course, was one of the three ringside officials tasked by the Nevada State Athletic Commission (NSAC) to decide the outcome of the bout should it end up a decision.
Luckily for fight fans, the other two judges weren’t seeing the same fight as Ross. Judges Dave Moretti, 116-112, and Craig Metcalfe, 117-111, scored the bout for Mayweather.
Just about everyone else in the world agreed with them, too.
Everyone, that is, except Ross. She scored the fight a draw, 114-114.
Everyone makes mistakes, though. Right? Surely Ross would admit error a day or so later.
According to the Las Vegas Review-Journal, Ross stands firmly behind her card:
When you score 12 rounds of boxing, you’re scoring 12 separate fights. From where I sat, there were a lot of close rounds and a lot of exchanges Canelo was able to win. Canelo was able to land his punches effectively from the inside and control the rounds I gave him.
This isn’t the first time she’s pulled such shenanigans. When Timothy Bradley was handed a win over Manny Pacquiao last year, one of the two judges who egregiously scored the fight for Bradley was…can you guess?
Despite almost every single person on the planet seeing a clear and decisive Pacquiao win, Ross (and fellow NSAC boxing judge Duane Ford) scored the bout 115-113 for Bradley.
How bad was that? Well, a review by five WBO officials scored the bout for Pacquiao 5-0. That’s right. Not one single peer believed Bradley deserved the nod.
Want more? Notable boxing blog Fight Score Collector captured 265 total scores for fans, media and forum members. Only 10 people believed Bradley won the fight, and press scores collected under the same banner were a resounding 47-1 for Pacquiao.
So is this strike two for Ross? Maybe not, because the umpire might not be watching.
Just because a judge's scorecard ends up even, doesn't mean the judge necessarily thought the fight as a whole was even. It could be that a judge has six rounds for each fighter, but the six rounds she gave fighter A, she gave them to him easily and the six rounds she gave fighter B, they were really close rounds. That's pretty much how it was last night
Look, Kizer has every right to defend his selection of judges. He absolutely has to make tough calls for big-money fights with hardworking fighters' fame, fortune, title belts and legacies on the line. But Kizer also needs to understand that more than one mistake begins to become a pattern.
And a pattern of bad scorecards over the past two years in two of boxing’s biggest and most important fights is not something boxing can afford.
So let’s hope Kizer was playing coy. Let's hope he's paying attention. Let’s hope he’s keeping score.
We know Ross can’t.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?