Liverpool FC: Why Charlie Adam Can Be Better Than Raul Meireles
With more than five centralĀ midfieldersĀ in the club, competition for a place in the starting lineup will be fierce, and with the signing of Charlie Adam, Raul Meireles's future looks uncertain.
Kenny Dalglish has been chasing Adam for the past six monthsāand for good reason. Dalgish finally got him and paid around ā¤9 million for his services.
Now he has those two and Gerrard fighting it out for the attacking mid position. With Gerrard an almost certainty, it's for Kenny to decide between Adam and theĀ Portuguese.Ā
TOP NEWS

Live World Football Goals + Highlights š„

Most to Blame at Man Utd? š”

World Football Goals + Highlights š±
Well then, who will be the first choice? Let us compare them and take a look.
Age
Raul Meireles
At 28, he is at the peak of his career. But this peak may last only about a a year or so.
He isĀ definitelyĀ NOT one for the future, and hence FSG may have some say about it. But the age factor MAY also mean that he has more experience handling big games and pressure situations.
Most of the time, it's the veterans who come to the rescue during need. Hence, he would be more suitable as an impact player coming out from the bench and changing the course of the game.
Ā Charlie Adam
Ā He too is probably at the peak of his career, but as he is just 25, it may be a few years before his stamina starts to wane.
Adam wins this round.
Physical Attributes
Raul Meireles
Ā He is one of the most versatile players out there. He may not be made for the English game, but he adapted very quickly.
When you look at stamina, Meireles is one of the fittest players in the Premier League, running an average of 8.1 km per match.
Charlie Adam
Although he also can run around the pitch for the full 90 minutes, his distance covered is a little less, which means that Meireles wouldĀ probablyĀ be better at pressing opponents.
Point: Meireles
Passing
Raul Meireles
Ā He may not be the best passer of the ball, but he can create chances quite regularly. His short-range passing is effective, but the long-rang ones falter sometimes.
Charlie Adam
Ā He's quite brilliant when it comes to passing. Penetrating passes,Ā lofted ones, ones that areĀ drilled low ,short range, long range etc. etc.āyou name them and he can do them. No wonder he is being compared with Xabi Alonso and Jan Molby.
He is also gifted with great vision.
Point: Adam
Shooting and Set Pieces
Raul Meireles
Ā He has a great right foot, can deliver good crosses into the box, and was a regular for set pieces in theĀ absenceĀ of Steven Gerrard.
But, he cannot score from free kicks and has neither the raw power of Gerrard nor the curling ability of Adam.
Charlie Adam
Ā He has a sweet left foot.Ā He generally takes the majority of his corners from the right side, sending in an in-curling ball to the head (ideal for Carroll).
His direct free kicks are dangerous too, with both power and accuracy. He is most effective when at theĀ centerĀ and the ball curling to the top right cornerĀ .
I suppose both are at almost the same level when it comes to set pieces, but AdamĀ definitelyĀ has the upper hand. Meireles has the better shooting and volleying ability, though.
So no points here!Ā
Attacking Attributes and Goalscoring
Raul Meireles
Having scored five goals in six games last season, he has earned himself the tag of a prolific goal scorer. His screaming volleys gave nightmares to keepers, and he also pitched in with six assists.
Charlie Adam
Ā He is also known for scoring goals. He scored 12 goals and provided nine assists last season, though some of them were from set pieces.
Point: Adam
Others
Their technical abilities and defensive attributes are pretty much the same. Also, they are equally good (or bad) aerially.
ConclusionĀ
By considering these factors, Adam seems more suited for the starting lineup; Meireles as an impact player. Of course, this is just an opinion.
Note: The point system was done in good spirits, and was not intended to cause any harm orĀ disrespect.
.png?w=2560)
.png?w=2560)
.jpg?w=2560)
.jpg?w=2560)



.jpg?w=2560)

