WWE: Top 5 Worst Match Types of All Time

These are the worst match types in the WWE. This list contains matches that weren't one time deals. Some crazy matches that happen once or twice won't be found on this list!

I think most fans would agree that a good stipulation makes the match that much more interesting. If the match is too bland and original, it doesn't capture the effect that it should.

TLC, Hell in a Cell and Elimination Chamber matches are all examples of great match types, but what are the worst?

Let's find out!

No 5: Iron Man Match

I might be in the minority on this one but oh well. I think that an hour for two wrestlers is beyond too long.

Maybe the match should be 30 minutes instead of 60 minutes. Watching two wrestlers for that long better produce at least a 6-5 score.

Regardless of the score, the Iron Man Match is overrated. The only match that should last an hour is the Royal Rumble.

Match Rating - C+

No 4: One vs. One

This match type is the most original of them all, so let's just get it out of the way early. It's not like this is horrible, originality isn't necessarily bad, it is just sometimes boring.

There is nothing more boring than two middle-class wrestlers in one-on-one action on Monday Night Raw or Smackdown.

One vs one can get boring, that's all. Not every one-on-one is boring, though. Some of the most memorable matches have been one-on-one, obviously. So that is why it is number four.

Match Rating - C-

No 3: Tables Match

The first person to put their opponent through a table wins...sounds interesting. Then comes the match, and it isn't as cool.

This match seems great from the outside but really isn't. I want to see action but this leaves me very disappointed.

For about three-fourths of the match, superstars will attempt to throw their opponent through a table. Their efforts generally fail miserably.

Finally, the wrestler will put their opponent through the table and that's it? Obviously because that is how the rules work, but it just seems like there should be more.

After the very first tables contest, I wasn't excited when this stipulation was put on a match.

Match Rating - D

No 2: First Blood

When this match was created I thought it was awesome. Fight until someone bleeds, who doesn't love to watch that?

Then, I got older. Now, when I think about it, how dumb would it be to end the match for a scratch on the knee? I mean seriously.

Let's say that the Undertaker vs. HHH match was a first blood (I understand the WWE these days, so that wouldn't happen) and the Undertaker had a cut on his leg that wasn't scripted, what then? The streak is over?

Maybe that is one of the reasons that the first blood match hasn't been seen in a while. Oh, and because the fact that wrestling has changed in the past five years.

Match Rating - D-

No 1: Handicap Match

Is it just me, or do others hate when the main event is a handicap match? I can't stand it.

Two against one...maybe, but not three, four or five against one. It just isn't realistic. Not even the Big Show could beat five other guys, give me a break.

Some people may enjoy the handicap match but I can't get into it.

This one is the worst of all match types.

Match Rating - F