Roger Federer Vs Rafael Nadal: War of The Worlds
In the day, it was a theme of abstruseness, of obscurity, of unknown: the epitome of the word revolution. This so-called revolution, the internet, has done us our good, but of course, given birth to cyber-borne soldiers. ย
Instead of lining on a battle field, these soldiers jab at each other like birds fighting for the last worm. ย But for them, a cause infinite times more worth than a worm; it's the Fedal War.
Before 2004, none of this subject was ever brought up, or even given the merest thought. ย Now, it's a full-blown struggle in a world of nothing but air, screen, wire, and nothingness. ย
TOP NEWS

Ranking Top NFL Edge-Rushers ๐

Wild Neymar Meltdown After Game

Ranking Top NFL Cornerbacks ๐
It couldn't be Roger Federer's case, it doesn't fit.
Federer. Even the name is soothing, not as in a subject of mollification, but as in a Monet painting, with Federer as Monet himself. ย Rafael Nadal gives the sensation of energy, a bull in a fight in his native Spain. ย
No, it is the force of the soldiers rising about morals, ethics, ground, and simply put, class.
Two raging forces fighting for one word: better.
Backhanded statements, low volleys, comebacks: words of life, words of tennis. ย Oh, how these two forms of artistry and life are so intertwined, and yet so separate. ย Tennis, a game. ย Life, the real deal. Yet the soldiers camp out for tennis, not the art of which created tennis, which created itself.
Tennis is life itself, except in the form of drama: it's life to the core, a display of raw passion.
So why must these soldiers taint the 'perfect' image of tennis, the classical game of sportsmanship and geniality. ย Then why would there be a net to separate the two players? ย
Mark my words, the war will be longer than the Hundred Years' War. ย It may meet with Oblivion, but the soldiers, also forgotten, will still rage about the simple, one syllable word:ย better.
Isn't tennis better without this war? ย Isn't tennis better off with Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal?
In a game of modern romantics, dwelling on the past, why must we, as spectators, have to bet at the losing-end of this unstoppable, incurable, ever-raging war?
.jpg?w=2560)





