Cardinals Sign Matt Holliday, Answer Biggest Question But Create Many More

Evan BruschiniCorrespondent IJanuary 6, 2010

ST. LOUIS, MO - OCTOBER 10:  Matt Holliday #15 of the St. Louis Cardinals kisses his bat at home plate in the sixth inning against the Los Angeles Dodgers in Game Three of the NLDS during the 2009 MLB Playoffs at Busch Stadium on October 10, 2009 in St. Louis, Missouri. (Photo by Dilip Vishwanat/Getty Images)
Dilip Vishwanat/Getty Images

It's finally official: the St. Louis Cardinals have retained All-Star outfielder Matt Holliday, giving Albert Pujols his much needed protection and cementing themselves as a top-tier contender for the 2010 World Series.

Holliday and the club announced today that they've agreed to terms for a 7-year/$120 million contract that will keep the sweet-swinging slugger in St. Louis through 2016.

The deal comes complete with a no-trade clause and a vesting option for 2017 that will kick in if he finishes in the top 10 for the 2016 National League MVP voting.

While we can't be sure what the Cardinals are getting themselves into long-term, we can analyze where this puts the Redbirds in the present day.

Second, we need to look at where this places the Pujols extension saga. Holliday's deal is the richest of the offseason, and the richest in Cardinals history—yet. Assuming that Albert Pujols re-signs (which he should), his deal should be among one of the largest in baseball—nay, sports—history.

And how will the Cardinals manage two bulky contracts? Would they retain Adam Wainwright?

Next question: How does this affect the Cardinals' position in 2010? In my opinion, the Cardinals were the favorites to win the Central without Holliday. But with the addition of his salami-sized bat, the Cardinals are now the runaway favorites. I could see the Brewers hanging in there, but I don't believe the have the depth the Cardinals do.

Another immediate concern here: What about third base? The Cardinals are now set at every position but third. Do they stick with rookie and DUI offender David Freese? Or do they try to sign a low-risk, high-reward guy like Miguel Tejada?

It's clear that St. Louis has a lot of questions after this deal. But they've certainly answered their biggest one.


The latest in the sports world, emailed daily.