
The Los Angeles Dodgers and San Diego Padres continue to track Boston Red Sox star Mookie Betts for a possible trade, according to MLB Network's Jon Heyman.
Heyman added a deal between Boston and one of the two teams "seems pretty likely at this point."
Buster Olney of ESPN later reported the Red Sox and Dodgers are "deep into talks," with Boston left-hander David Price's name also a part of discussions.
Betts has been viewed as a trade candidate ever since Red Sox ownership signaled it wasĀ shedding payrollĀ in order to get under the luxury tax for 2020.Ā Betts and the Sox avoided arbitration by agreeing to anĀ MLB-record $27 millionĀ deal for the upcoming season, but the two sides have yet to come to terms on a long-term extension.
The Athletic'sĀ Andy McCulloughĀ reported Thursday that conversations between Los Angeles and Boston were progressing. Although the Dodgers are reluctant to moveĀ Gavin Lux or Dustin May, two of their best prospects, McCullough wrote they'd have enough to get the Red Sox on-board.
He also reported the teams had thrown around a deal that would also include David Price, who will makeĀ $96 millionĀ before he becomes a free agent in 2023.
The Padres already acquired Tommy Pham and Trent Grisham to fortify their corner outfield positions this offseason, but Betts would obviously be a big upgrade.Ā He batted .295 with 29 home runs, 80 RBI and a .524 slugging percentage in 2019.
When San Diego was mentioned as a team in the Francisco Lindor sweepstakes, The Athletic'sĀ Ken RosenthalĀ speculated the Padres might have wanted to keep him away from the Dodgers. The same logic would apply to trading for Betts while strengthening their lineup at the same time.
Red Sox chief baseball officer Chaim BloomĀ told reportersĀ he expects Betts to be on the roster when the team starts the regular seasonĀ March 26 against the Toronto Blue Jays. However, it looks like Boston may have a new starting right fielder when the dust settles this offseason.Ā Ā





.png?w=2560)


.jpg?w=2560)

.jpg?w=2560)
.jpg?w=2560)

.png?w=2560)