
Henry's Luis Suarez Clause Stance Demonstrates New Powerful Liverpool Mindset
Liverpool owner John W. Henry is in the headlines today following comments over the weekend regarding Luis Suarez's infamous buyout clause last summer.
Media outlets are widely reporting headlines similar to "Henry: We ignored Suarez clause"โsuch as RTE, Irish Independent, The Express and ESPN. ย
Of course, as with all media reports, it's important to look beyond the sensationalist headline, especially in this instance, given that Henry does not use the word "ignore" at any stage.
TOP NEWS

Grading Top Coach Decisions ๐ญ

World Cup Power Rankings ๐

Messi Stars in Shakira Vid ๐คฉ
Quotes
Henry was speaking at the MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference on Saturday, and the quotes were transcribed by Liverpool supporterย Dave Philipsย on twitter. Those quotes were than copied by media outlets without attributionโjust with added sensationalist headlines in most instances.
"Photo of the panel "Ownership Perspective: Managing Transitions" #SSAC14 pic.twitter.com/rwSEQR7GJJ
โ Linda Pizzuti (@Linda_Pizzuti) March 1, 2014"
The actual quotes, as per Philips, are:
"He [Suarez] had a buyout clause of ยฃ40m. Arsenal, one of our prime rivals โ this year weโre tied for 2nd โฆ weโre actually 2nd because of GD [goal difference].
They offered ยฃ40m+ยฃ1. What weโve found ... is that contracts donโt seem to mean a lot in England โ actually, in world football.
It doesnโt matter how long a playerโs contract is, he can decide heโs leaving.
We sold a player, Fernando Torres, for ยฃ50m, that we did not want to sell, we were forced to.
Since apparently these contracts donโt seem to hold, we took the position that weโre just not selling.
"
The key part being the final word there on the stance that Liverpool and owners FSG took.
Clause
Most media have taken this as an admission from Henry that the clause existed, but that Liverpool opted to ignore it.
However, that would contradict what the Professional Footballer's Association found after they looked over the contract in the summer. "Professional Footballers' Association chief Gordon Taylor says Luis Suarez's contract does NOT require Liverpool to sell him if they receive a bid of ยฃ40m," as per The Mirror.
So clearly, the clause is still pretty unclear.
It appears that some sort of clause did exist but that it was fairly ambiguous to say the least. But that's nothing we didn't already know.
The release clause was likely implied but not explicitly detailed, so the "clause" was effectively meaningless and Henry knew it.
"Suarez's clause was tested by various lawyers & the PFA. John Henry has either been misquoted or not got his own wording right.
โ Tony Barrett (@TonyBarretTimes) March 3, 2014"
Bravado?
Henry's comments too may not need to be taken as literal either, especially given the context and complicated nature of the clause.
The principal owner of Liverpool was steadfast when Suarez attempted to engineer a move away in the summer; "โWe are not going to sell Luis," "ย It is unequivocal, but that doesnโt seem to slow them [Arsenal] down so I canโt wait to see what the next bid is," "Whatever the bid is, we wonโt sell him"โas per The Telegraph.
Henry showed impressive leadership and put the club's best interests first.
Lessons Learned
Clearly too, Henry feels that FSG had their fingers burnt by Fernando Torres' controversial departure just a few months after their purchase of the club.
The subsequent purchase of Andy Carroll for ยฃ35 million and huge transfer failings under then-director of football Damien Comolli were cast aside by the formation of the club's "transfer committee" and paved the way for a more frugal and economically savvy Liverpool.
Henry alluded to the steep learning curve in his comments prior to those directly about Suarez, saying "I donโt think we were really prepared for buying a team in the English Premier League"โas per Philips.
FSG made mistakes and Liverpool suffered from them, but Henry has shown and continues to show that those same mistakes will not be made again.
Liverpool are no longer a club that others can bully in the transfer market; they emanate strong leadership from the top.






.png)

.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)