The One Thing I Wish the New York Broadcast Media Respected
There are only a few things I ever ask of my baseball play-by-play announcers.
The first, largely but not always obeyed, is to display some common decency. If you wouldnโt say it in front of your mother, itโs probably not appropriate for TV.
The second is that you get your eyes checked on a regular basis (Iโm looking at you, John Sterling). Donโt tell me โthat ball is high, it is far, it is...caught.โ Itโs either gone or itโs not, so please make sure you know which one it is before giving the entire East Coast a heart attack.
The third, and the most often ignored, is simple: Please, please, please for the love of all thatโs holy, respect baseball superstition.
I know, I know. Most people donโt believe in it. Your words in the press booth canโt possibly affect what happens on field.
Still, baseball superstition is as much a part of the game as peanuts and cracker jacks.
There is one superstition, in particular, of which I am especially careful: no mentioning of a no-hitter or perfect game until itโs over.
The media at large is generally not respectful of this; in New York the broadcast media (I am staring right at you, Michael Kay) seems to have a personal vendetta against anyone who so much as even politely requests the no-mentioning-of-a-no-hitter until itโs over.
This is especially annoying, as there are many different ways to insinuate a no-hitter without mentioning it: โHeโs got zeroes across the board,โ โTake a look at your line score,โ โX team has only had X baserunners and they reached on X,โ โPitcher Y is putting on a clinic,โ โGo call your friends,โ etc.
Really, the things that could be said instead of โwe have a no-hitterโ or โwe have a perfect gameโ are endless.
So I ask the New York broadcast media this question: Is anyoneโs experience going to be ruined because you didnโt mention that such and such pitcher was pitching a no-hitter until it was over?
If you could make even just one fan happy by respecting this most ancient of baseball traditions, would it not be worth it?
Would it hurt for just one time not to mention the words โnoโ and โhitterโ?
In the grand scheme of things, this is a relatively minor quibble. Really, if the biggest problem youโre having is that someoneโs jinxing your pitcherโs no-hitter, youโre probably having a pretty good day.
Still, the way the NY mediaโand here I am referring to Michael Kay and those who broadcast with himโmakes it such a point that jinxes donโt exist and that those who do believe in superstition are somehow not qualified to be baseball fans is insulting to those of us that like to respect the superstition of the game.
After all, as the Chicago Cubs can probably attest, if thereโs a group of deities out there you donโt want to upset, itโs the baseball gods.











