Determining a Champ: Another Solution to the BCS Mess
At a time when every college football fan has an idea on how to fix the BCS, I couldn't help but add my two cents to the mix.
For the record, I don't expect that anyone involved with college football would agree to the following. My only intention is to encourage further thinking about how to make a great sport even better.
I'm not going to go so far as to throw away the BCS and start from scratch. I also want to maintain as much tradition as possible while creating a more level playing field.
So with that in mind...
First, Notre Dame has to move to the Big East. The Irish can keep their TV deal, but their inclusion in a BCS conference is a must.
If they refuse to participate, they don't get to play in a BCS bowl unless they finish in the top four.
The ND move ensures that the Big East can play eight conference games per season—which is an exact requirement for all conferences. If the two teams tied for the Pac-10 or Big Ten lead don't play each other during the regular season, they have to play on conference championship weekend.
BCS conference teams will play a more structured out-of-conference (OOC) schedule to ensure a more balanced system.
Out of four OOC games, at least two must be against fellow BCS conference teams, and none may be played against I-AA teams.
If a BCS conference team wants to pay a team a large sum of money to be a sacrificial lamb, they're still permitted to schedule non-BCS conference teams.
The BCS OOC games will be scheduled by the NCAA—not the member institutions. The NCAA will uphold existing OOC rivalry games like Georgia-Georgia Tech, Clemson-South Carolina, and Notre Dame-USC.
The rest of the games will be randomly drawn, with each team playing one game at home and one game away per season. These matchups will be drawn every two years, so that each team plays against a scheduled opponent at home and away in successive seasons.
Schools can schedule their remaining OOC games, with the following provisions:
First, a team can schedule each non-BCS school only twice every eight years, with the exception of existing rivalry games approved by the NCAA (e.g. Colorado-Colorado State and Notre Dame-Navy). This ensures that schools will play a variety of opponents.
Second, schools must play one of these games away from home every two years (i.e. one out of four games). Scheduling teams from the Sun Belt or MAC is fine, so long as a school is willing to travel every now and then.
Teams can also use these games to play other BCS teams in the interest of rivalries or strength of schedule.
For example, Notre Dame will have scheduled rivalry games with USC and Boston College every season, but can still schedule a game with Michigan if they so desire.
The following is a simulation of a random draw for the two OOC games involving BCS teams...
(Rivalry games are in bold.)
OOC Game 1
South Carolina | at | Clemson |
Wake Forest | at | Vanderbilt |
Notre Dame | at | USC |
Georgia | at | Georgia Tech |
Iowa | at | Iowa State |
Florida State | at | Florida |
Penn State | at | Pittsburgh |
Louisville | at | Kentucky |
West Virginia | at | Virginia Tech |
Miami FL | at | Northwestern |
Michigan | at | UCLA |
Mississippi | at | Texas Tech |
Tennessee | at | Kansas |
Kansas State | at | Washington State |
Stanford | at | Ohio State |
Cincinnati | at | Boston College |
Oregon State | at | North Carolina |
California | at | Texas A+M |
Texas | at | Washington |
Rutgers | at | Mississippi State |
Auburn | at | Maryland |
Duke | at | Colorado |
Missouri | at | LSU |
Nebraska | at | South Florida |
Illinois | at | Baylor |
Alabama | at | Arizona State |
Minnesota | at | Oklahoma State |
Connecticut | at | Indiana |
Arizona | at | Wisconsin |
Oklahoma | at | Virginia |
Arkansas | at | NC State |
Michigan State | at | Oregon |
Syracuse | at | Purdue |
OOC Game 2
Boston College | at | Notre Dame |
Florida | at | Miami FL |
Maryland | at | West Virginia |
North Carolina | at | South Carolina |
Kansas | at | Michigan |
Washington State | at | Mississippi |
Washington | at | Tennessee |
Arizona State | at | Kansas State |
NC State | at | Stanford |
Virginia | at | Cincinnati |
Baylor | at | Oregon State |
Texas Tech | at | California |
USC | at | Texas |
Clemson | at | Rutgers |
Wisconsin | at | Auburn |
Iowa State | at | Duke |
Indiana | at | Louisville |
Pittsburgh | at | Florida State |
Mississippi State | at | Missouri |
Virginia Tech | at | Nebraska |
Oklahoma State | at | Illinois |
Oregon | at | Alabama |
Northwestern | at | Georgia |
Colorado | at | Syracuse |
LSU | at | Wake Forest |
Vanderbilt | at | Minnesota |
Georgia Tech | at | Connecticut |
Texas A+M | at | Arizona |
South Florida | at | Oklahoma |
Ohio State | at | Arkansas |
Kentucky | at | Penn State |
UCLA | at | Michigan State |
Purdue | at | Iowa |
As for the BCS itself—the only change I would make is to eliminate the Coaches Poll in favor of the Associated Press Poll.
The coaches have too much to win or lose from the rankings to be entirely objective. While I'm not accusing coaches of outright bias, history has shown that the press is more likely to be evenhanded.
What would all this accomplish?
For starters, teams could never be accused of not playing good teams out of conference. They would play games against BCS opponents, and would be immune from criticism, as the NCAA would be scheduling the matchups.
There are drawbacks to the system, but that's to be expected. There is no perfect solution. In any event, the proposal has fewer flaws than the current model.
Leaving the BCS in place would appease its supporters. More importantly, the change would give the voters and the computers more information in making their choices.
Best of all, the new system would provide another level of excitement to a sport that thrives on it. Conference races would still go down to the wire, and there would be more quality OOC games than ever before.
.jpg)





.jpg)







