
The North Carolina Tar Heels made the 2025 NCAA tournament by the skin of their proverbial teeth on Sunday, and it was a controversial decision.
UNC got in with the final at-large bid and had a solid 22-13 record on the season, but just a 1-12 record against Quad 1 opponents. According to Jordan Mendoza of USA Today, "Nevada in 2019, Syracuse in 2021 and North Carolina State in 2023 all got at-large bids with just one Quad 1 win" since the NET rankings were introduced before the 2018-19 season.
So it's rare, but not completely unprecedented. That didn't stop the reaction being mostly shock, and anger, at UNC's inclusion in the tournament:
North Carolina's NET ranking (36) was higher than the first four teams let out of the field, and half of its Quad 1 losses were by single-digit points. Should quality losses really count when deciding a team's March Madness credentials, however? Especially when the quality wins are almost entirely lacking?
The NCAA selection committee doesn't have an easy job, but it's tough to find a truly legitimate argument for including North Carolina. Just ask social media.




.jpg?w=2560)


.jpg?w=2560)

.jpg?w=2560)


