Holy Chizik! Give Auburn a Break!

Daniel McGowinCorrespondent IJune 26, 2009

AUBURN, AL - SEPTEMBER 20:  The special teams unit of the Auburn Tigers prepare for a kick-off after the offense scored against the LSU Tigers at Jordan-Hare Stadium on September 20, 2008 in Auburn, Alabama. LSU defeated Auburn 26-21.  (Photo by Doug Benc/Getty Images)

Two seasons after Alabama makes a splash with the hiring of Nick Saban, Auburn goes out and, like 13-year-old Chinese divers, barely makes a splash in the pool by hiring Gene Chizik.  That is not a Saban-like hire; that is like a Neil Callaway-like hire (see UAB).  But give Auburn a break…at least for now.

There are a couple of important things to keep in mind.  First off, Iowa State is bad.  Really bad.  And they have historically been awful. 

Yes, they had some success in the 1970s under the legendary Earle Bruce and later with Dan McCarney, whom Chizik succeeded as head coach in Ames.  But this is a program that has a winning percentage of around 43 percent. 

And even under McCarney the Cyclones were more like breezes, losing as many as 10 games twice and successful seasons were spotty (and driven by players that would move on to the NFL — Sage Rosenfels, Ellis Hobbs, Seneca Wallace).  Even though McCarney was able to recruit respectable classes, it was still a tough sell.  So, you cannot necessarily hold that against Chizik.

Second, remember that Chizik was a well-respected coordinator. 

As a defensive coordinator, he produced three Thorpe winners (best DB in college football) and led defenses on two different undefeated teams — 2004 Auburn Tigers and the 2005 Texas Longhorns (BCS champs that season).  His 2004 effort also earned him the Frank Broyles Award, given to the best assistant coach.  So his talent was recognized.

It was probably a bad investment on his part to take the Iowa State job, but he saw his opportunity.  Unfortunately, it did not pan out; or at least he was not there long enough to find out. Keep in mind that Pete Carroll did not do so well at the pro ranks and could be considered a questionable hire by Southern California (at least at the time).

I am not stating that Chizik will build a dynasty similar to what Carroll has done in Los Angeles, but the situations are similar.  Carroll was not the Trojans top choice—nowhere near it. 

And Carroll was not well-received at first.  Going 6-6 in his first season and losing to Utah in the Las Vegas Bowl certainly did not help things.  Going to the Las Vegas Bowl to begin with was bad enough!

Now, Carroll is considered one of the better coaches in the FBS ranks and rightfully so.  In the right situation, Carroll has flourished.  Perhaps the same can happen with Chizik on “The Plains.”  Only time will tell.

Maybe he is not the best pick.  Maybe Turner Gill would have been better.  Or maybe we will find out that Chizik is not really cut out to be a head coach.  Great coordinator (see Carl Torbush), but not fit to be the top guy. 

But cut Auburn some slack.  It was certainly questionable to fire—whoops, allow Tuberville to "resign" and then fill the void with a 5-19 coach who is riding a nice ten game losing streak. 

But Chizik is no dummy when it comes to football.  He has been at Auburn before and knows the recruiting trails in the SEC.  Pulling in the 19th best recruiting class, according to Rivals, displays his ability to recruit.  And, as B/R colleague Nick Bishop notes, adding knowledgeable assistants such as offensive genius Gus Malzahn will help bring Auburn back into the SEC elite.

So relax!  Chizik was successful at his assistant gigs at Auburn and Texas and perhaps was just in a bad situation in Ames.  Have the patience that Mr. Bishop is asking for and give it time.  At least until August.

This article originally appeared on Uncle Popov's Drunken Sports Rant on December 15, 2008.

slash iconYour sports. Delivered.

Enjoy our content? Join our newsletter to get the latest in sports news delivered straight to your inbox!