Washington Redskins Boast League's Top Defense
As someone with occasionally too much time on his hands, I often get annoyed about things that really shouldn't affect me.
One of those things is: Why is the NFL's system of ranking defenses so antiquated?
Using total yards allowed in today's NFL is an idea that is way past its time. There are so many yards that a defense is willing to give up in today's pass-heavy NFL, that defenses tend to be unfairly judged.
TOP NEWS
.jpg)
Colts Release Kenny Moore

Projecting Every NFL Team's Starting Lineup 🔮

Rookie WRs Who Will Outplay Their Draft Value 📈
For instance under the NFL's way of doing things, you can make the argument that no team with a dominant offense (in terms of yardage and points) can have a top-rated defense.
The reason for that argument is that, once teams have a big lead, there is a certain amount of yardage that a team is willing to give up as long as they don't allow enough points for their opponent to get back into the game. This holds true in the fourth quarter of a lot of games.
The NFL's current system fails to take into account the most important thing a defense can do—get the ball back into the hands of its offense.
To this end, I have created the NFL's Aggregate Defensive Ranking. It takes into account total points allowed, rushing yards allowed, and a majority of passing yards allowed.
However, it also takes into account the factors that allow defenses to get off of the field—third down conversion percentage against, total sacks, and total turnovers created.
With that in mind, here is a look at the Aggregate Defensive Rankings through Week 4 of the NFL season:
| Ranking | Team | Total Pts. | Total Rushing Yds | Total Passing Yds | Total Yards / Gm | Turnovers | 3rd Conversion % | Sacks | ADR |
| 1 | Washington Redskins | 63 | 338 | 848 | 296.5 | 6 | 26.0% | 15 | 13.9 |
| 2 | Baltimore Ravens | 57 | 290 | 848 | 284.5 | 14 | 33.0% | 11 | 14.1 |
| 3 | New York Jets | 95 | 522 | 721 | 310.8 | 10 | 26.0% | 9 | 16.8 |
| 4 | Detroit Lions | 76 | 452 | 885 | 334.2 | 11 | 33.0% | 9 | 21.1 |
| 5 | San Francisco 49ers | 75 | 296 | 1136 | 358.0 | 11 | 33.0% | 9 | 22.1 |
| 6 | Dallas Cowboys | 101 | 247 | 920 | 291.8 | 6 | 38.0% | 13 | 22.6 |
| 7 | New York Giants | 87 | 466 | 977 | 360.8 | 8 | 34.0% | 12 | 23.5 |
| 8 | Cincinnati Bengals | 74 | 347 | 755 | 275.5 | 4 | 32.0% | 10 | 24.3 |
| 9 | Houston Texans | 70 | 435 | 857 | 323.0 | 7 | 39.0% | 12 | 25.3 |
| 10 | Cleveland Browns | 93 | 498 | 782 | 320.0 | 5 | 34.0% | 11 | 26.7 |
| 11 | Philadelphia Eagles | 101 | 558 | 871 | 357.2 | 4 | 37.0% | 15 | 27.3 |
| 12 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 77 | 404 | 1068 | 368.0 | 6 | 33.0% | 10 | 28.6 |
| 13 | Tennessee Titans | 56 | 351 | 848 | 299.8 | 7 | 44.0% | 10 | 29.2 |
| 14 | Green Bay Packers | 97 | 284 | 1343 | 406.8 | 11 | 44.0% | 11 | 30.5 |
| 15 | New Orleans Saints | 98 | 376 | 1016 | 348.0 | 3 | 38.0% | 13 | 31.8 |
| 16 | Arizona Cardinals | 87 | 422 | 1131 | 388.2 | 6 | 37.0% | 10 | 34.0 |
| 17 | Chicago Bears | 98 | 497 | 1206 | 425.8 | 7 | 34.0% | 8 | 36.7 |
| 18 | San Diego Chargers | 85 | 406 | 785 | 297.8 | 5 | 43.0% | 8 | 38.3 |
| 19 | Oakland Raiders | 113 | 544 | 1095 | 409.8 | 6 | 43.0% | 11 | 40.2 |
| 20 | Minnesota Vikings | 96 | 305 | 1145 | 362.5 | 3 | 46.0% | 12 | 42.1 |
| 21 | Buffalo Bills | 96 | 518 | 1102 | 405.0 | 11 | 41.0% | 4 | 42.4 |
| 22 | Jacksonville Jaguars | 85 | 428 | 915 | 335.8 | 5 | 38.0% | 6 | 44.6 |
| 23 | Carolina Panthers | 102 | 575 | 812 | 346.8 | 4 | 33.0% | 6 | 45.1 |
| 24 | Atlanta Falcons | 105 | 389 | 1102 | 372.8 | 8 | 42.0% | 5 | 46.2 |
| 25 | Indianapolis Colts | 108 | 532 | 1029 | 390.2 | 7 | 48.0% | 7 | 51.9 |
| 26 | Denver Broncos | 111 | 411 | 1100 | 377.8 | 5 | 43.0% | 7 | 52.2 |
| 27 | Pittsburgh Steelers | 72 | 478 | 630 | 277.0 | 1 | 39.0% | 7 | 52.9 |
| 28 | St. Louis Rams | 113 | 719 | 899 | 404.5 | 5 | 46.0% | 8 | 56.5 |
| 29 | New England Patriots | 98 | 435 | 1475 | 477.5 | 9 | 48.0% | 6 | 57.2 |
| 30 | Seattle Seahawks | 97 | 420 | 946 | 341.5 | 2 | 37.0% | 5 | 69.8 |
| 31 | Kansas City Chiefs | 126 | 520 | 971 | 372.8 | 4 | 44.0% | 5 | 71.9 |
| 32 | Miami Dolphins | 104 | 430 | 1228 | 414.5 | 2 | 43.0% | 6 | 84.8 |
On the strength of a seven-sack performance and 172 net yards allowed against the St. Louis Rams, the Washington Redskins (yes, the Washington Redskins) have vaulted to the top of the rankings.
They have racked up a total of 15 sacks so far this season and are allowing only 26 percent of third downs to be converted. They lead the league in both categories (However, the Redskins will not get to play Sam Bradford and the Rams again this season).
On their heels are the Baltimore Ravens. Anybody who watched their performance against the New York Jets on Sunday Night Football can understand why. The Ravens are creating turnovers at an alarming rate. It will be interesting to see if they can stay near the top, once opposing offenses are a little more careful with the ball and adjust to the Ravens' multiple blitz packages.
Even though the Jets have struggled against the run, they come in this week at number three because of their strong third down, sack, and turnover totals thus far.
One team to watch as we get later into the season is the Dallas Cowboys, currently ranked sixth (fourth quarter meltdowns not withstanding). They currently are the league's stingiest against the run and are capable of racking up huge sack numbers with DeMarcus Ware and Rob Ryan's aggressive blitzing defense. The Cowboys should only get better against the pass, as they continue to learn Ryan's new system.
Tom Brady and the Patriots will be a huge test coming off of their bye. The league's most disappointing defense for me thus far has been the aforementioned Patriots. Conventional wisdom going into this season was that they were loaded on both sides of the ball. They have given up a ton yards (granted, a lot them have come after the Pats have already built huge leads), but their third down and sack numbers thus far are troublesome. I do expect improvement as the weather gets worse in the Northeast—fewer passing yards and closer games most likely.
That'll do it for this week. See you next week with the Week 5 ADR!

.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)