NFLNBAMLBNHLWNBASoccerGolf
Featured Video
Ohtani Little League HR 😨

A Different View on the NL Cy Young Race

Zach FeinSep 29, 2008

Brandon Webb. No doubt about it.

Since 1998, the teams of the 20 Cy Young winners in both leagues had an average of 93 wins, with all but one reaching the threshold of 85 wins (Brandon Webb, 2007, when Arizona finished with 76 wins).

As the D-Backs are currently 10 games ahead of the Giants—Tim Lincecum is the only other reasonable choice for the NL Cy Young, as I'm not including CC Sabathia, who started more games in the AL than in the NL—with 82 wins, look for the voters to choose Brandon Webb.

TOP NEWS

Washington Nationals v Los Angeles Angels
New York Yankees v. Chicago Cubs

So here's the question: Is Webb the right choice?

To test this, I developed a new stat called Wins Saved. First, I determined the amount of runs each team in the MLB would have had to not given up by using the Pythagorean Formula, which I'll call RPLL, or runs per less loss.

(Here's an example: Tampa Bay scored 774 runs and gave up 671; according to the Pythagorean Formula, using a 1.83 exponent, the Rays should have won 91.5 games and lost 69.5. I found out the amount of runs less the Rays should have given up if they were expected to win 91.5 games and lose 68.5.

For the Rays, it was approximately five runs—if they had given up 665 runs instead of 671, they would have lost only 68.5 games. Get it? Good.)

(Follow-up note: Most teams had a RPLL of around five or six, with the high of seven and a low of four.)

Then I figured out the amount of runs every pitcher saved above average. That was calculated from the ERA by subtracting the player's ERA by the league ERA, dividing by nine, and multiplying by innings pitched. After that was complete, divide that number by the RPLL of that player's current team. That number is the wins saved.

I calculated the wins saved using ERA, Fielding-independent Pitching, and Runs Created Allowed per nine innings, which was is calculated by finding the runs created by opposing hitters of that pitcher (using the 2002 version, found here), and then dividing by IP and multiplying by nine.

Here are the results, for the 87 pitchers with at least 162 innings pitched, sorted by FIP Wins Saved.

Wins Saved of Pitchers with 162+ IP
NameTeamWS-FIPWS-ERAWS-RCA
Tim LincecumSF10.610.910.5
CC SabathiaMIL7.89.38.1
Roy HalladayTOR7.38.67.9
Cliff LeeCLE6.58.16.4
Brandon WebbARI5.55.26.3
Derek LoweLAD4.65.26.2
Jake PeavySD3.47.25.6
Johan SantanaNYM3.99.45.2
Ryan DempsterCHC3.55.34.4
Cole HamelsPHI2.15.34.3
Ervin SantanaLAA5.04.24.0
Joe SaundersLAA-0.34.13.9
Dan HarenARI6.24.93.8
Ben SheetsMIL3.75.53.3
Jon LesterBOS2.84.43.2
Ricky NolascoFLA2.53.93.1
Daisuke MatsuzakaBOS0.94.52.9
Edinson VólquezCIN3.64.92.9
James ShieldsTB2.73.82.8
Matt GarzaTB0.72.62.7
Paul MaholmPIT0.92.92.6
Roy OswaltHOU2.53.72.6
Hiroki KurodaLAD3.02.52.5
Scott BakerMIN1.52.92.4
John DanksCWS3.43.72.2
Chad BillingsleyLAD4.45.32.1
Carlos ZambranoCHC0.21.52.0
Mike MussinaNYY1.93.61.7
Dave BushMIL-2.30.71.4
Mike PelfreyNYM2.02.71.3
Tim WakefieldBOS-1.40.71.3
Jeremy GuthrieBAL-0.82.51.3
Gil MecheKC2.81.71.3
Greg SmithOAK-2.40.81.2
Armando GalarragaDET-1.82.21.1
Josh BeckettBOS3.61.01.1
Ubaldo JiménezCOL2.41.50.9
Félix HernándezSEA4.53.90.9
Aaron CookCOL2.41.80.9
John LannanWAS-1.91.80.5
Greg MadduxLAD0.90.60.5
Zack GreinkeKC3.23.90.5
A.J. BurnettTOR4.31.40.4
Todd WellemeyerSTL-0.82.70.3
Jesse LitschTOR0.23.00.3
Mark BuehrleCWS1.62.70.3
John LackeyLAA-0.52.20.2
Justin VerlanderDET0.9-1.80.1
Jair JurrjensATL2.82.8-0.1
Kyle LohseSTL1.62.5-0.1
Matt CainSF2.43.5-0.2
Oliver PérezNYM-1.30.6-0.3
Jamie MoyerPHI0.22.3-0.4
Ted LillyCHC-0.40.9-0.4
Dana EvelandOAK1.30.0-0.5
Randy JohnsonARI2.21.8-0.5
Randy WolfHOU1.00.2-0.7
Scott OlsenFLA-3.40.6-0.9
Jered WeaverLAA1.60.0-1.1
Jason MarquisCHC-0.8-0.5-1.1
Gavin FloydCWS-2.31.9-1.1
Braden LooperSTL-0.60.8-1.5
Nick BlackburnMIN-0.10.7-1.5
Andy SonnanstineTB1.6-0.1-1.6
Javier VázquezCWS2.6-1.5-2.0
Joe BlantonPHI-0.9-1.3-2.1
Andy PettitteNYY2.3-0.7-2.3
Manny ParraMIL0.3-0.2-2.4
Vicente PadillaTEX-1.5-1.1-2.9
Brett MyersPHI-0.8-0.7-2.9
Edwin JacksonTB-2.6-0.3-3.0
Paul ByrdBOS-2.7-0.8-3.1
Tim ReddingWAS-2.4-2.4-3.4
Johnny CuetoCIN-1.7-1.8-4.0
Bronson ArroyoCIN-0.9-1.9-4.4
Barry ZitoSF-5.5-4.0-4.5
Jeff SuppanMIL-4.9-2.5-5.2
Jon GarlandLAA-1.9-2.5-5.4
Daniel CabreraBAL-1.5-3.0-5.4
Aaron HarangCIN-2.2-1.8-5.7
Kenny RogersDET-2.7-4.4-5.8
Kevin MillwoodTEX0.8-2.0-5.9
Zach DukePIT-0.3-1.9-6.1
Brian BannisterKC-2.9-5.8-6.6
Nate RobertsonDET-2.3-6.3-7.2
Liván HernándezCOL-2.8-6.8-9.6
Brandon BackeHOU-5.9-6.4-9.8

Lincecum is tops in every category, and by quite a bit to boot. But because he's pitching on a 72-win team, chances are the voters won't choose him as the NL Cy Young winner.

Lincecum leads Webb in almost every major category—ERA by six-tenths of a point, strikeouts by 60, and WHIP—while only behind in wins, by four. It seems as if the only thing that matters in the voting is wins, both player and team totals.

Which isn't right. Lincecum should be the NL Cy Young winner, and deservedly so.

Ohtani Little League HR 😨

TOP NEWS

Washington Nationals v Los Angeles Angels
New York Yankees v. Chicago Cubs
New York Yankees v Tampa Bay Rays
New York Mets v San Diego Padres

TRENDING ON B/R