A Different View on the NL Cy Young Race
Brandon Webb. No doubt about it.
Since 1998, the teams of the 20 Cy Young winners in both leagues had an average of 93 wins, with all but one reaching the threshold of 85 wins (Brandon Webb, 2007, when Arizona finished with 76 wins).
As the D-Backs are currently 10 games ahead of the Giants—Tim Lincecum is the only other reasonable choice for the NL Cy Young, as I'm not including CC Sabathia, who started more games in the AL than in the NL—with 82 wins, look for the voters to choose Brandon Webb.
TOP NEWS

Assessing Every MLB Team's Development System ⚾
.png)
10 Scorching MLB Takes 🌶️

Yankees Call Up 6'7" Prospect 📈
So here's the question: Is Webb the right choice?
To test this, I developed a new stat called Wins Saved. First, I determined the amount of runs each team in the MLB would have had to not given up by using the Pythagorean Formula, which I'll call RPLL, or runs per less loss.
(Here's an example: Tampa Bay scored 774 runs and gave up 671; according to the Pythagorean Formula, using a 1.83 exponent, the Rays should have won 91.5 games and lost 69.5. I found out the amount of runs less the Rays should have given up if they were expected to win 91.5 games and lose 68.5.
For the Rays, it was approximately five runs—if they had given up 665 runs instead of 671, they would have lost only 68.5 games. Get it? Good.)
(Follow-up note: Most teams had a RPLL of around five or six, with the high of seven and a low of four.)
Then I figured out the amount of runs every pitcher saved above average. That was calculated from the ERA by subtracting the player's ERA by the league ERA, dividing by nine, and multiplying by innings pitched. After that was complete, divide that number by the RPLL of that player's current team. That number is the wins saved.
I calculated the wins saved using ERA, Fielding-independent Pitching, and Runs Created Allowed per nine innings, which was is calculated by finding the runs created by opposing hitters of that pitcher (using the 2002 version, found here), and then dividing by IP and multiplying by nine.
Here are the results, for the 87 pitchers with at least 162 innings pitched, sorted by FIP Wins Saved.
| Name | Team | WS-FIP | WS-ERA | WS-RCA |
| Tim Lincecum | SF | 10.6 | 10.9 | 10.5 |
| CC Sabathia | MIL | 7.8 | 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Roy Halladay | TOR | 7.3 | 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Cliff Lee | CLE | 6.5 | 8.1 | 6.4 |
| Brandon Webb | ARI | 5.5 | 5.2 | 6.3 |
| Derek Lowe | LAD | 4.6 | 5.2 | 6.2 |
| Jake Peavy | SD | 3.4 | 7.2 | 5.6 |
| Johan Santana | NYM | 3.9 | 9.4 | 5.2 |
| Ryan Dempster | CHC | 3.5 | 5.3 | 4.4 |
| Cole Hamels | PHI | 2.1 | 5.3 | 4.3 |
| Ervin Santana | LAA | 5.0 | 4.2 | 4.0 |
| Joe Saunders | LAA | -0.3 | 4.1 | 3.9 |
| Dan Haren | ARI | 6.2 | 4.9 | 3.8 |
| Ben Sheets | MIL | 3.7 | 5.5 | 3.3 |
| Jon Lester | BOS | 2.8 | 4.4 | 3.2 |
| Ricky Nolasco | FLA | 2.5 | 3.9 | 3.1 |
| Daisuke Matsuzaka | BOS | 0.9 | 4.5 | 2.9 |
| Edinson Vólquez | CIN | 3.6 | 4.9 | 2.9 |
| James Shields | TB | 2.7 | 3.8 | 2.8 |
| Matt Garza | TB | 0.7 | 2.6 | 2.7 |
| Paul Maholm | PIT | 0.9 | 2.9 | 2.6 |
| Roy Oswalt | HOU | 2.5 | 3.7 | 2.6 |
| Hiroki Kuroda | LAD | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Scott Baker | MIN | 1.5 | 2.9 | 2.4 |
| John Danks | CWS | 3.4 | 3.7 | 2.2 |
| Chad Billingsley | LAD | 4.4 | 5.3 | 2.1 |
| Carlos Zambrano | CHC | 0.2 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
| Mike Mussina | NYY | 1.9 | 3.6 | 1.7 |
| Dave Bush | MIL | -2.3 | 0.7 | 1.4 |
| Mike Pelfrey | NYM | 2.0 | 2.7 | 1.3 |
| Tim Wakefield | BOS | -1.4 | 0.7 | 1.3 |
| Jeremy Guthrie | BAL | -0.8 | 2.5 | 1.3 |
| Gil Meche | KC | 2.8 | 1.7 | 1.3 |
| Greg Smith | OAK | -2.4 | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Armando Galarraga | DET | -1.8 | 2.2 | 1.1 |
| Josh Beckett | BOS | 3.6 | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| Ubaldo Jiménez | COL | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0.9 |
| Félix Hernández | SEA | 4.5 | 3.9 | 0.9 |
| Aaron Cook | COL | 2.4 | 1.8 | 0.9 |
| John Lannan | WAS | -1.9 | 1.8 | 0.5 |
| Greg Maddux | LAD | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.5 |
| Zack Greinke | KC | 3.2 | 3.9 | 0.5 |
| A.J. Burnett | TOR | 4.3 | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Todd Wellemeyer | STL | -0.8 | 2.7 | 0.3 |
| Jesse Litsch | TOR | 0.2 | 3.0 | 0.3 |
| Mark Buehrle | CWS | 1.6 | 2.7 | 0.3 |
| John Lackey | LAA | -0.5 | 2.2 | 0.2 |
| Justin Verlander | DET | 0.9 | -1.8 | 0.1 |
| Jair Jurrjens | ATL | 2.8 | 2.8 | -0.1 |
| Kyle Lohse | STL | 1.6 | 2.5 | -0.1 |
| Matt Cain | SF | 2.4 | 3.5 | -0.2 |
| Oliver Pérez | NYM | -1.3 | 0.6 | -0.3 |
| Jamie Moyer | PHI | 0.2 | 2.3 | -0.4 |
| Ted Lilly | CHC | -0.4 | 0.9 | -0.4 |
| Dana Eveland | OAK | 1.3 | 0.0 | -0.5 |
| Randy Johnson | ARI | 2.2 | 1.8 | -0.5 |
| Randy Wolf | HOU | 1.0 | 0.2 | -0.7 |
| Scott Olsen | FLA | -3.4 | 0.6 | -0.9 |
| Jered Weaver | LAA | 1.6 | 0.0 | -1.1 |
| Jason Marquis | CHC | -0.8 | -0.5 | -1.1 |
| Gavin Floyd | CWS | -2.3 | 1.9 | -1.1 |
| Braden Looper | STL | -0.6 | 0.8 | -1.5 |
| Nick Blackburn | MIN | -0.1 | 0.7 | -1.5 |
| Andy Sonnanstine | TB | 1.6 | -0.1 | -1.6 |
| Javier Vázquez | CWS | 2.6 | -1.5 | -2.0 |
| Joe Blanton | PHI | -0.9 | -1.3 | -2.1 |
| Andy Pettitte | NYY | 2.3 | -0.7 | -2.3 |
| Manny Parra | MIL | 0.3 | -0.2 | -2.4 |
| Vicente Padilla | TEX | -1.5 | -1.1 | -2.9 |
| Brett Myers | PHI | -0.8 | -0.7 | -2.9 |
| Edwin Jackson | TB | -2.6 | -0.3 | -3.0 |
| Paul Byrd | BOS | -2.7 | -0.8 | -3.1 |
| Tim Redding | WAS | -2.4 | -2.4 | -3.4 |
| Johnny Cueto | CIN | -1.7 | -1.8 | -4.0 |
| Bronson Arroyo | CIN | -0.9 | -1.9 | -4.4 |
| Barry Zito | SF | -5.5 | -4.0 | -4.5 |
| Jeff Suppan | MIL | -4.9 | -2.5 | -5.2 |
| Jon Garland | LAA | -1.9 | -2.5 | -5.4 |
| Daniel Cabrera | BAL | -1.5 | -3.0 | -5.4 |
| Aaron Harang | CIN | -2.2 | -1.8 | -5.7 |
| Kenny Rogers | DET | -2.7 | -4.4 | -5.8 |
| Kevin Millwood | TEX | 0.8 | -2.0 | -5.9 |
| Zach Duke | PIT | -0.3 | -1.9 | -6.1 |
| Brian Bannister | KC | -2.9 | -5.8 | -6.6 |
| Nate Robertson | DET | -2.3 | -6.3 | -7.2 |
| Liván Hernández | COL | -2.8 | -6.8 | -9.6 |
| Brandon Backe | HOU | -5.9 | -6.4 | -9.8 |
Lincecum is tops in every category, and by quite a bit to boot. But because he's pitching on a 72-win team, chances are the voters won't choose him as the NL Cy Young winner.
Lincecum leads Webb in almost every major category—ERA by six-tenths of a point, strikeouts by 60, and WHIP—while only behind in wins, by four. It seems as if the only thing that matters in the voting is wins, both player and team totals.
Which isn't right. Lincecum should be the NL Cy Young winner, and deservedly so.



.jpg)







