Featured Video
Fantasy Chat

Tim Tebow Autographs Cause Problems With FOX Sports

Ross Lipschultz
Aug 16, 2010

In every facet of sports, there will always be fans wanting to meet a favorite athlete.

These people have waited hours just to see their idol and get one thing from them: an autograph.

No matter what the game is, die-hard fans will do anything to get a scribble from these professionals, and Sundayโ€™s Denver Broncos game proved that in spades. This time, however, it wasnโ€™t just the people in the stands getting involved.

It was the people with the press credentials. The media.

According to former president of the Professional Football Writers of America, Alex Marvez of FOX Sports, a Cincinnati reporter and a photographer approached Broncosโ€™ third string messiah Tim Tebow for his John Hancock in the locker room.

Tebow, being a good guy, politely signed. Seems like a dream come true, right?

Wrong. The sports media jumped on these guys worse than Tiger Woods.

Pro Football Talk reported that Broncosโ€™ public relations staff booted the journalists out immediately after getting the autographs, and then the blogosphere went insane.

Journalists wanted the guys to star in โ€œThe Legend of Sleepy Hollowโ€ as the Headless Horsemen. Yahoo! Sports called them homers and referred to it as terribly unprofessional.

The real question, however, is why. Why are these journalists so maligned now for asking for Tebowโ€™s signature?

First, letโ€™s clarify.

Autographs are close to the dumbest thing on Earth. Itโ€™s great to get something signed with no proof of who signed it, and if you are a big fan, you arenโ€™t going to sell it. Instead, you are going watch the ink fade away on your shelf.

Well, until your kids sell it once you pass on.

Congrats. Learn how to use a camera.

Back to the point.

The sports media is enraged about this because they believe it undermines the professionalism of the job. Journalists should not mix business with pleasure, and many feel that this could throw bias into a story about the game.

Although, if you are reading stories about preseason football, youโ€™ve got bigger problems.

These two pariahs, however, seem to be getting the short end of the stick. Yes, itโ€™s clear that using press credentials to obtain Tebowโ€™s autograph is not part of the job, thatโ€™s not arguable.

The strange thing here is not about that, though. Itโ€™s about the speculation afterwards.

Doug Farrar, the reporter who covered this for Yahoo! Sports, says this is akin to โ€œhitting the press box wearing your home teamโ€™s jersey and cheering through the entire game.โ€ While that may be hyperbole, it seems to be ignoring a huge factor.

Every sports writer has a favorite athlete, sport, league, etc. Why else would they have gotten into sports journalism?

Itโ€™s the profession for those who arenโ€™t athletic enough to play the sport they cover.

Some of the most prominent writers in the media today make it clear who they admire. But they do not get treated like Frankensteinโ€™s monster in doing so.

A great example is Michael Wilbon. He goes on national television daily, praising his hometown Chicago Bulls and occasionally donning a Northwestern jersey.

And thatโ€™s not just because he looks great in purple.

This praise is exactly what an autograph is. This athlete or team has made such a big impact on the person that he or she wants to commemorate it. Shouldnโ€™t they be allowed to, regardless of their profession?

Still, the prognosticating by many a blogger goes much deeper. The consensus is that getting this autograph will sway their opinion on Tebow.

However, not a single person who sees it this way found and/or complained about the reporterโ€™s piece or any piece in a Cincy paper. It should be out today, considering it covered last nightโ€™s game, but no word on it being pro-Broncos or pro-Tebow.

Doesnโ€™t seem so fair anymore.

This kind of thing needs to be judged on a case-by-case basis. Farrar called for the two journalistsโ€™ names to be released to show everyoneโ€™s held to the same standard.

But not to humiliate them. Because releasing their info to a slobbering, attacking media certainly wouldnโ€™t do that.

If someone can find this personโ€™s article and itโ€™s full for Tebow love, then the gripe is valid. If they report with objectivity and class, keeping personal feelings aside, then thereโ€™s no harm.

Just two fans with chicken scratch.

So for those people who complain that this is the apocalypse for sports journalists, please get real. All fans and sports page readers care about is entertaining and factual news.

After LeBron Jamesโ€™ "The Decision" aired, they knew credibility was low.

While they shouldnโ€™t abuse their privileges, the two gentlemen should be judged on their body of work instead. If you can scrounge through Cincinnati papers and find a glowing article on Tebow, then cry me to the moon.

If not, shut your trap.

Bloggers at home know if they were face-to-face with someone whoโ€™s been as hyped as Tebow, theyโ€™d have him sign their chests if paper wasnโ€™t available.

Fans will be fans. Just let it go.

Follow me on Twitterย and check out more atย L.A. Sports Examiner.