Should We Be Disturbed By Tim Wakefield's Interview in the Herald?
I must admit that I was somewhat disappointed to read several of the remarksย Tim Wakefieldย made in an interview that was published in todayโs edition of the Boston Herald .
Whatever happened to putting the team first?
I know the knuckleballer must be disappointed that most pundits project him to be the sixth starter (or swingman) for the 2010 Red Sox pitching staffโฆ myself included. But so what? Our opinion doesnโt really matter one iota.
TOP NEWS

Fresh Trade Ideas 1 Month from Deadline โฐ

Buzz: Cutch Joins New Team

All-Star Game Roster Predictions ๐ฎ
In my opinion, when asked about the speculation, Wakefield should have simply responded: โthese things have a way of working themselves out.โ Instead, he unfortunately came across as a bit too concerned about himself and a bit too unconcerned about the ballclub. Apparently, his desire to set the franchiseโs career โwinsโ record should come before the teamโs win-loss record.
The Red Sox have a rotation that has at least three aces, and could have as many as five depending on how Buchholz and Matsuzaka pitch (certainly, both have ace โstuffโ). Meanwhile, Wakefield hasnโt proven he can get through the end of the regular season since 2007.
And while I know he made the all-star team for the first time in his career last season, I also know he made only four starts while compiling a 6.00 ERA after the Mid-Summer Classic.
The ballclub could not responsibly rely on him for 200 innings in 2010โhe has averaged fewer than 160 IP over the last four seasonsโso they went out and signed Lackey. That means Wakefield will almost certainly be relegated to the bullpen this year. But, as I said earlier, these things usually work themselves out.
Yet, in the Herald article, it seems Wakefieldโs new favorite word is โIโโฆ not โusโ or โteamโ. And I am sorry, but I find THAT fact to be disturbing.
Here are some excerpts:
โI did make the All-Star team last year. It seems every year, I donโt know why, my name gets brought up like this, and I donโt feel I need to prove myself every day. I donโt know where the rumors are coming from, but I try not to pay attention. I know my role and I know what my approach is going to be when I get to spring training: be a starter and help us win the World Series.โ
โLast year I was on my way to pitching 200 innings and then due to circumstances beyond my controlโI didnโt hurt my shoulder, I didnโt hurt myself pitching, I hurt my back swinging in interleagueโit didnโt happen. I donโt know who is saying Iโm only a part-time pitcher, but I think some of their opinions might be based on not knowing how I was feeling. Yesterdayโs visit (with the doctors) may have gotten rid of some questions marks they have.โ
โHopefully they respect me enough to give me the ball when we get to spring training as a member of this rotation. I think Iโve earned the right to be a full-time starter and go from there.โ
Sorry, Tim, I disagree. Through the years you have certainly EARNED a contract for 2010; but, you will only earn the right to be a full-time starter in 2010 on the field , starting in a couple of weeks.
IF you outpitch Josh Beckett or Clay Buchholz or John Lackey or Jon Lester or Daisuke Matsuzaka, thenโand ONLY thenโwill you have earned a starting role. Otherwise, you will have earned a spot in the bullpen.
Sorry, I am a BIG fan, but THAT is how I see it.
The game is still a team sport. Itโs about wins and losses. Personal records are nice, but Iโm more interested in seeing the team win a world championship this year than seeing you atop the franchiseโs career wins list at seasonโs end. Sorry, but that's the way I see it.







.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)
