NHL
HomeScoresRumorsHighlights
Featured Video
🚨Sabres Force Game 7 vs. Habs
New York Islanders v New York Rangers
Michael Mooney/NHLI via Getty Images

Rangers' Retool in Uncomfortable Position After 2025 NHL Trade Deadline

Adam HermanMar 11, 2025

For the New York Rangers, a vision of change summarizes the 2024-25 season. The now infamous “memo” that general manager Chris Drury deposited into the inboxes of 31 other teams in late November forebode massive roster upheaval.

How peculiar it is that, following the trade deadline, everything looks almost the same. 

Since the trade deadline, the Rangers have played two pivotal games with playoff implications against the Ottawa Senators and Columbus Blue Jackets. Goaltending in both creases was the only reason the overtime loss to Ottawa was remotely close. The 7-3 drubbing by Columbus would have been the low point in the season for any team if they hadn't dropped similar stinkers earlier in the season.

TOP NEWS

NHL Mock Draft
Kucherov Landing Spots

The latter statement gets to the crux of the Rangers’ greater dilemma. Every attempt to use the jumper cables to give life to the team or change the complexion of the roster had little effect on resolving the problems that continued to befall the Rangers. They spend way too much time in their own end and not enough in the offensive zone. They bleed rush chances yet are unable to maintain possession through the neutral zone themselves. The breakouts are ineffective and they abandon defensive shape any time something goes wrong.

To their credit, the team is no longer going through the motions. The disgruntled players (Jacob Trouba, Kaapo Kakko) are gone in favor of new players who either have something to prove or are energized by a fresh start. The compete level is night and day compared to the sleepwalking that occurred earlier in the campaign.

That should serve as a reality check for all, whether it's management, the coaches, or the fans. Everyone begged the players to show some competitive spirit and moxie on the ice. They are delivering. The results show that it’s not making a difference. It may make for a more watchable product. It may bring some buzz to Madison Square Garden. The players might be bonding better on road trips. But the results on the ice are as bad as ever.

J.T. Miller, for his part, has been excellent. He has seven goals and eight assists through 14 games, and he’s playing with contagious passion at the moment. And yet what does it say about acquiring him to turn around the team if the very best he has to offer has failed to make a difference in the overall team results? If league-bottom team defense is what the honeymoon phase looks like, then what’s to come? The idea here isn't that Miller is culpable for the Rangers' deficiencies, it's that his addition did not address them.

This is, as we previously disclosed, where criticisms of the Miller trade lie. The Rangers were a bad defensive team needing a true 200-foot bulldog at center and multiple top-four defensemen who could suppress goals and break out pucks from the back.

Meanwhile, they’re down Filip Chytil, Victor Mancini, and either a 2025 or 2026 first-round pick without having addressed a single one of those issues. If the Rangers are to turn things around in time for the Miller trade to matter, then it will have to be pretty quickly; Miller will be 33 years old by the 2026 playoffs.

If fans are being honest with themselves, this drifts uncomfortably close to mimicking the motifs of the Dark Ages of Rangers hockey from 1998 through 2004. Management would try to salvage seasons with flurries of impulsive trades for lateral roster swaps of depth pieces or aging star players. Those trades would require parting with key young players and prospects. When those moves didn’t work, management brought in new coaches. When that didn’t work, they’d chase their losses with even riskier moves to salvage another season headed for disaster. Each move would exacerbate the problems they were trying to fix and make it harder to address them the next time around.

The Rangers aren’t quite there yet, but recent events at least raise some caution flags. If they do fire head coach Peter Laviolette in the summer, it will mean the organization would have its fourth full-time head coach in six seasons. The trade for an aging player amid a free-fall down the standings recalls the priorities of a dreadful era.

Shortcomings in terms of speed, processing play, and defensive acumen have been glossed over in favor of romanticizing spark plugs. Reilly Smith’s departure to Vegas makes him the most recent addition to a pile of ephemeral attempts to address the right wing position with a conveyor belt of draft picks.

New York Rangers v New York Islanders

In other ways, the organization could be set up for success. Adam Fox and Igor Shesterkin are cornerstones in their prime years locked up long-term. Drury gutted a lot of the rot and opened up $16 million worth of cap space. The team has several quality prospects such as Gabe Perreault who can fill in the gaps on cheap contracts for years ahead, thereby granting permission to management to break the bank on difference-makers in free agency or via trade.

The Rangers have multiple problems that cannot be fixed with One Simple Trick. The team’s fundamental makeup makes it barely able to keep up with bubble teams, to say nothing of the Eastern Conference elite. Management correctly identified this early in the season and opened up the opportunity to build something new.

Now it’s incumbent on them to change the way this team plays with players who cohere to a long-term vision and not the dopamine rush of chasing instant gratification.

🚨Sabres Force Game 7 vs. Habs

TOP NEWS

NHL Mock Draft
Kucherov Landing Spots
Penn State v Michigan State
Minnesota Wild v Colorado Avalanche - Game Two

TRENDING ON B/R