Breaking Down the Mechanics of a Modern Transfer Deal

As most football clubs are run as independent companies and are not franchised by a league entity, there exists no mandated or collectively-agreed model for transferring players.

Where in the major North American leagues, such as the NBA and NHL, players move from one team to another through trades, in much of club football these exchanges are financial transactions, just as the sale of any asset would be a financial transition in the broader business world.

But how, exactly, do they work? What has to happen before an agreement is reached and a player is swapped for what the market has determined is his cash value?

First, it’s important to understand that there are two types of transfers. Let’s call them “un-hostile” and “hostile.”

In an un-hostile transfer, a club will openly shop a player to its counterparts in the hope of attracting a buyer. This can happen if the relationship between the club and player has broken down or the club’s financial situation necessitates an influx of money.

In any event, an un-hostile transfer occurs when neither the player in question nor the selling club have any objection to a sale—the player is on the market and, as such, is picked off by a buyer. Most transfers fall under this category.

Hostile transfers are the ones that get our attention. They tend to play out in the media over weeks and even months and are typically the ones that involve the greatest sums of money. Gareth Bale’s prospective move from Tottenham Hotspur to Real Madrid is a perfect example, so let’s use it in setting out the steps it takes from whispers to unveiling.

Step one: The buying club expresses interest in another club’s player.

As far back as February, when Bale was in the middle of a breakout season at Spurs, Real Madrid president Florentino Perez revealed his admiration for the Welshman and was quickly linked with a £50 million move for the attacker (Telegraph). Spurs had not articulated any desire to sell their best player, so Madrid’s initial move on Bale was a hostile one.

Step two: The selling club refuses to engage in negotiations.

Until things went quiet a few days ago, Tottenham had continued to insist Bale was not for sale. As recently as last Friday Spurs chairman Daniel Levy was reported to have told the 24-year-old he wasn’t going anywhere (Mirror) even as Madrid continued to offer astronomical sums for his services.

Step three: The press becomes a negotiating tool.

Football managers may sometimes seem as if they don’t get on with the media, but when it comes to transfer negotiations the press is often their best friend. Spurs, for example, must have been delighted with last week’s reports that they were embroiled in contract talks with Bale (Guardian) while Madrid would have been pleased with stories suggesting the player had asked to leave White Hart Lane (Mirror).

Step four: Either the selling club budges or the player requests a transfer.

There is nothing stopping a player from formally submitting a transfer request. Clubs are typically loathe to reject such requests as a player on their books who doesn’t want to be there is hardly a benefit to the squad as a whole. But as long as the player remains contracted to them they are under no obligation to sell.

In January, for example, West Bromwich Albion refused to transfer Peter Odemwingie to Queens Park Rangers even after the Nigerian arrived in London assuming a deal would be agreed.

Regarding Bale, Madrid sporting director Zinedine Zidane has already urged the reigning PFA and FWA Player of the Year to request a transfer. As reported by the Daily Mail:

"

The chance to play for Real Madrid might only come around once in a player’s lifetime, and it is understandable that Gareth doesn’t want to miss out on it.

"

Levy and Spurs hold firm they stand a chance of retaining Bale, but more often than not a hostile transfer will go through when the buyer is as obsessed with an acquisition as Madrid seem to be in this instance.