NBA Draft 2013: Latest Big Board and Top 30 Projections for Week of Jan. 8
We kicked off the New Year with our first big board of 2013, and weโve already made some drastic changes to it after a single week.
Letโs take a closer look at the top 30 players in the nation and across the Atlantic, assign an overall ranking to each one, followed by an alphabetical grade based on their performances and upside as an NBA draft prospect.
Make sure to reference the changes from last weekโs big board, as weโve made it easy for you by putting each playerโs Jan. 1 ranking in parentheses next to their name.
TOP NEWS

2 Players Left from Russ' Draft Class

Bob Iger Talks Lakers Purchase

๐จRussell Westbrook Retires
Please note thisย isnโt a mock draft; prospects are ordered by overall grade and not by projected draft order.ย
ย
No. 1:ย Nerlensย Noel, C, Kentucky (Remains No. 1)
Even if Noel isnโt having the best statistical season, heโs our top prospect.
The big man has the size and athleticism to become a force in the NBA, even if it takes him some time to develop. Donโt expect him to come in and make an immediate impact, but down the line he may be one of the better PF/Cโs in the league.
Grade: A+ย ย
No. 2:ย Shabazzย Muhammad, SF, UCLA (Up from No. 3)
Regardless if Muhammad plays the 2 or 3 at the next level, heโs going to find a way to score.
With so many teams in the lottery looking for someone who can simply put the ball through the bottom of the net, thereโs no doubt in our minds that he is going to be a top-three pick come draft day.
Grade: A+
No. 3: Alex Len, C, Maryland (Down from No. 2)
Len put himself on the map by outplaying Noel and Willie Cauley-Stein in the beginning of the season, and he continues to rise with great play for the Terps.
The big man has a skill set that will translate to the pros and we expect heโll be an extremely solidโif unspectacularโstarter in a few years.
Grade: A+
ย
No. 4: Benย McLemore, SF, Kansas (Remains No. 4)
No player has improved his stock over the course of the season more than the Jayhawks swingman.
Heโs shown the ability to shoot the ball from anywhere on the floor and has the body to absorb contact when going to the cup. He reminds us a bit of Bradley Beal, his former AAU teammateโwho went No. 3 overall in the 2012 draft.
Grade: A+
ย
No. 5: Alexย Poythress, SF, Kentucky (Remains No. 5)
Poythress has many of the same skills that Michael Kidd-Gilchrist provided last year for the Wildcats, but his motor isnโt as strong.
If the young man can start hustling more, while continuing to do all the important thingsโscore, rebound, play defense, etcโheโs going to become a star in the NBA.
Grade: A+
ย
No. 6: Codyย Zeller, C, Indiana (Remains No. 6)
While Zeller topped many big boards at the start of the 2012-13 campaign, weโve been skeptical on the young man and it seems for good reason.
Heโs yet to show much of a noticeable improvement over his superb freshman season, which isnโt a bad thing, but makes scouts leery that he has reached his ceiling.
Grade: A
ย
No. 7: Anthony Bennett, PF, UNLV (Remains No. 7)
It doesnโt matter that Bennett doesnโt possess the prototypical size for a 4; he has the heart and strength to get his buckets and out-muscle the opposition in the paint.
Thereโs plenty of undersized bigs making an impact in the NBA, so as long as Bennett continues to dominate on the glass and on the scoreboard, heโs going to be a lottery lock.
Grade: Aย
ย
No. 8: Otto Porter, SF, Georgetown (Up from No. 9)
Porter has a shine to his game and continues to improve with more experience at the collegiate level. He knows how to score and contribute in a number of categories, making him an extremely intriguing prospect.
As for his perceived low upside, that just may keep him on the fringes of the lottery, rather than going in the top half.
Grade: A
ย
No. 9: Michael Carter-Williams,ย G, Syracuse (Up from No. 10)
If you were designing an elite NBA PG, youโd probably want someone to be the size of MCW.
At 6โ6โ, heโs a massive guard and has elite playmaking abilities, coupled with a pass-first mentality. As long as he continues to set up his teammates and earn easy buckets for everyone, we doubt another point guard will come off the board before Carter-Williams.
Grade: A
ย
No. 10: Archie Goodwin,ย SG, Kentucky (Down from No. 8)
With so many athletic guards taking over the league right now, Goodwin is going to be a coveted player in the draft.
He is one of the most freakishly fast and quick guys on the board, and many teams will take a chance on him in order to guard the likes of Russell Westbrook, Derrick Rose and other top-tier players.
Grade: A-
ย
No. 11: Marcus Smart, PG, Oklahoma State (Up from No. 16)
Smart is immensely coachable and continues to improve his scoring and passing capabilities.
If he keeps it up, the Pokes star will be one of the first guards selected on draft day.
Grade: A-
ย
No. 12: C.J.ย McCollum,ย SG,ย Lehighย (Up from No. 14)
Everyone loves a scorer, and McCollum is the best in the class.
Heโs a bit undersized and perceived to be a ball hog at times, but thereโs no denying his natural talent to simply put points up on the board.ย
McCollum reminds us a bit of Damian Lillard from last yearโs classโa young man who went to a small school and had no problem translating his scoring ability to the next level.
Grade: B+
ย
No. 13: Masonย Plumlee, PF, Duke (Remains No. 13)
Donโt sleep on Plumlee becoming an early lottery pick, as thereโs not much to pick apart concerning his game.
He does all the little things, hustles and plays with a motor that just wonโt quit. The Blue Devil star is a glorified garbage man, but every championship team needs a player like him logging major minutes.
Grade: B+
ย
No. 14: Isaiah Austin, PF, Baylor (Down from No. 11)
We truly want to put Austin higher, but we just arenโt sold on his ability to play the 4 in the NBA.
Heโs too skinny and seems to desire handling the ball like a guard and fires up shots from all over the court like a swingman.
If he bulks up and starts banging in the paint come the combine and workouts, the Baylor starโs stock is going through the roof.ย
Grade: B+
ย
No. 15: Rudyย Gobert, PF, France (Down from No. 12)
Does Gobert have what it takes to translate his giant frame from the EuroLeague to American shores?
We know a team will certainly take a stab at his potential, as his wingspan and size are just too much to ignore. It remains to be seen if he can harness this into a successful career in the Association.
Grade: B
No. 16: Trey Burke, PG, Michigan (Up from No. 26)
Like McLemore, Burke has proven himself over the first half of the season and is now looking like a legitimate lottery pick.
The Wolverines PG is piloting an elite program to a top seed in the NCAA tournament, and we suspect his play there will determine his draft position. Right now, heโd absolutely be a top pick because of his elite scoring and distributing talents.
Grade: B
ย
No. 17: Darioย Saric, SF, Croatia (Remains No. 17)
Saric is a point-forward that may be one of the better playmakers in this class, but as with many Euro prospects, we just canโt tell if heโll be able to pack that talent in his suitcase and bring it to the USA.
Heโs extremely young, so we can see a deep, veteran contender using a mid-to-late first round pick and stashing him overseas for a while.
Grade: B-
ย
No. 18: James Michaelย McAdoo, PF, UNC (Down from No. 15)
McAdoo continues to plummet down on our big board, as the once-projected top pick continues to fall from grace.
Heโs shown no improvement from his freshman year, and may have in fact regressed in his second year with the Tar Heels. If he doesnโt figure out how to turn things around, heโs likely a fringe first-rounder and would be better served staying in school.
Grade: B-
ย
No. 19: Jamaal Franklin,ย SG, San Diego State (Up from No. 21)
The Aztecs junior guard has played consistently well through the 2012-13 campaign and will likely land in the first round because of this.
Heโs supremely athletic, has a nice rebounding knack and knows how to get to the cup. If he polishes up his jumper in time for workouts, it will do wonders for his stock.
Grade: B-
ย
No. 20: Tony Mitchell, SF, North Texas (Down from No. 18)
Weโd like to see Mitchell completely destroy the low level of competition that his Mean Green are facing, but that hasnโt been the case on a consistent basis.
Until that happens, we arenโt sold on this young man as a top prospect.
Grade: C+
ย
No. 21: B.J. Young, PG, Arkansas (Down from No. 19)
Young has great athleticism and scoring touch, but he doesnโt distribute and seems like a mediocre floor general.
Perhaps itโs because his Razorback teammates are subpar, but weโre not expecting this kid to come into the NBA and start leading the league in assists. He may be better served in a spark plug role off the bench.
Grade: C+
ย
No. 22: Myckย Kabongo, PG, Texas (Down from No. 20)
Kabongo canโt get back on the floor until Feb. 13, but his stock is still relatively high.
He reminds many of a young Rajon Rondo, with his great passing instincts, elite athleticism and a drive-and-dish type of game.
Grade: C+
ย
No. 23: Jeffย Withey, C, Kansas (Up from No. 25)
Withey is a natural defender and shot-blocker, but he wonโt be a great professional player until he develops more on the offensive end.
Right now, heโs a liability and needs to work on his post-up game.
Grade: C
ย
No. 24: Willie Cauley-Stein, C, Kentucky (Up from No. 28)ย
Noel gets all the attention in Lexington, Ky. but Cauley-Stein is an intriguing prospect that has a lot of raw potential.
It wouldnโt be a major shock to see him get selected in the lottery, mostly due to the lack of high-upside bigs in this class.
Grade: C
ย
No. 25: Gary Harris,ย SG, Michigan State (Down from No. 23)
The Spartans star has made a name for himself during his time in East Lansing, Mich. but has much to improve on and is getting by mostly on his great athletic abilities.
If he decides to stay another year under Tom Izzo, Harris could be a lottery pick.
Grade: C
ย
No. 26: LeโBryan Nash, SF, Oklahoma State (Down from No. 24)
Nash canโt seem to get his head in the game, but often plays amazing when heโs actually focused.
He possesses the body of a star NBA player and the potential to become one, but the question is: Does he have the desire?
Grade: C-
ย
No. 27: Steven Adams, C, Pittsburgh (Down from No. 22)
Adams is nothing more than a big body in our minds, but some scouts are extremely high on his potential, so weโve listed him here.
He looks like an absolute bust and needs more time in school before he gets destroyed in the NBA.
Grade: C-
ย
No. 28: C.J. Leslie, PF, NC State (Down from No. 27)
Leslieโs had an up-and-down collegiate career, and that inconsistency is not helping his stock.
Itโll take a solid stretch of great play and perhaps a deep tournament run to get Leslie back into the first half of the first round.
Grade: D+
ย
No. 29: Glenn Robinson III, SF, Michigan (Unranked last week)ย
Michigan basketball is back on the map, and this young man has significantly contributed to its excellent season.
The forward has an NBA pedigree and has put up some great numbers in recent games. If he keeps it up, the freshman will land in the leagueโjust like his pops.
Grade: D+
ย
No. 30: Brandon Paul, SG, Illinois (Down from No. 29)
Paul hasnโt exactly lived up to all the expectations foisted upon him when he first started playing in Champagne, Ill. but heโs doing well as of late.
Heโs a great athlete, above-average shooter and knows how to score when driving with the rock. Paul could be a steal late in the draft.
Grade: D
ย
Dropped From Rankings
No. 30: Doug McDermott, SF, Creighton
ย



.jpg?w=2560)
.jpg?w=2560)
_0.jpg?w=2560)
