Featured Video
Brewers SHOCK Padres in Game 2 ๐Ÿ˜ฑ

Trading Derrek Lee

Bullpen Brian
Jun 3, 2010

The Cubs should have no problem trading Derrek Lee, despite his full no-trade clause.

Heโ€™s a proโ€™s pro with a Gold Glove and a legitimate bat. And thatโ€™s worth trading for if youโ€™re a contender and in need of a first baseman, like say, Anaheim is.

But thatโ€™s not the only reason Anaheim makes sense. So often we see aging players return home to ride off into the sunset, Lee is a native Californian, and the Halos are contenders, nonetheless.

More favorably, Leeโ€™s in the final year of his 5-year contract that pays him $13M annually. Heโ€™s also nearing the end of his career, meaning any takers, not just the Angels, wouldnโ€™t have to commit to Lee for more than two-years beyond the trade, if that.

Whether or not the Cubs should trade Lee is another question. Chicago is still in the division huntโ€ฆbarelyโ€ฆbut still within striking distance at 6.5-games out. And while Derrek has struggled lately at the plate, heโ€™s still the No. 3 hitter on this team.

Trade the clubhouse leader, however, and youโ€™re signaling the end of 2010. No division championship, no Wild Card, and no rebounding from a poor 2009 season, either.

Derrek Lee is a face of the Cubs franchise. He means more to this team than most fans thinkโ€ฆas a leader, a team spokesman, and a stand-up guy all around. D-Lee isnโ€™t the type of player you replace easily, on or off the field.

Heโ€™s earned the right to invoke his no-trade clause if need be. But if Lee wants off this sinking ship on the North Side, Jim Hendry should have no problem finding Lee a new home, whether itโ€™s in Anaheim or elsewhere.