Milton Bradley For Pat Burrell?
Iโm willing to give Jim Hendry a mulligan on the Bradley signing, on one condition, of course.
That being Hendryโs ability to clean-up his own mess.
Clean-up duty, as we all know, never appears as large a job as it truly is, and trading the gameโs most recognizable malcontent wonโt be easy, either.
Hendry and the Cubs, however, canโt move forward this offseason until they take a step back and trade Milton.
The hot rumor is Bradley to the Rays for Pat โthe batโ Burrell.
Such a deal doesnโt fare well on paper for Chicago, but the money is close enough and Tampa showed plenty on interest in Bradley before Hendry came calling with 3-years $30-million.
I know Iโd make the move in a second.
Itโs true the Cubs donโt have a place to play Burrell, and itโs also true Burrell is coming off a disappointing season with Tampa, but thatโs not what a Bradley trade is all about.
What it is, in fact, is preventing an open wound from festering into a winter-long drama.
Thus, the sooner the Cubs make a move the quicker its wounds left by Milton begin to heal.
And if that means swapping Milton for a player without a place to play or eating a large portion of Bradleyโs contract, which is also likely, so be it.
Expediting the process also provides Hendry an opportunity to swing another deal at the Winter Meetings, in this case perhaps, slinging Burrell for bullpen help.
Whatever the case, someone has to goโฆwhoโs sent packing is on Hendryโs shoulders.







.jpg?w=2560)



.jpg?w=2560)

.jpg?w=2560)