THE HEISMAN DARKHORSE CANDIDATE ENTERS THE BIG RACE
THE NFL DRAFT REPORT PRESENTS
THE 2009 HEISMAN TROPHY RACE
A DARK HORSE EMERGES TO CHALLENGE
TOP NEWS

Texas HC Defends OSU ๐ค

Biggest CFB Surprises After Week 2 ๐

New CFB Playoff Projections ๐ฎ
THE TOP QUARTERBACK THOROUGHBREDS
ย by Dave-Te' Thomas
The NFL Draft Report
The 2009 Heisman Trophy hype centered around three โthoroughbredโ quarterbacks entering the season, with 2009 award recipient Sam Bradford-Oklahoma, 2008 award winner Tim Tebow-Florida and Colt McCoy-Texas garnering most of that attention. But, based on their season-opening performances, this trio might have to start looking over their shoulders, as a โdark horseโ candidate, Tony Pike-Cincinnati made a resounding opening statement that should make this a very interesting race throughout the season. Throughout the 2009 campaign, The NFL Draft Report will track the progress of the top fiveย quarterbacks expected to enter the 2010 NFL Draft, as they vie not only for the Heisman Trophy, but also the Johnny Unitas Golden Arm Award, Davey OโBrien Award and Manning Award, national honors reserved for the best quarterback in college football. To compile this โreport card,โ we examine each athleteโs performance in detailed categories listed below;
QUARTERBACK TALE OF THE TAPE | |||||
PLAYER | SCHOOL | COLLEGE POSITION | HEIGHT | WEIGHT | 40-YD |
BRADFORD,Sam | Oklahoma | Quarterback | 6:03.6 | 223 | 4.72 |
LeFEVOUR,Dan | Central Michigan | Quarterback | 6:02.7 | 238 | 4.91 |
McCOY,Colt | Texas | Quarterback | 6:02.2 | 212 | 4.68 |
PIKE,Tony | Cincinnati | Quarterback | 6:05.7 | 222 | 4.76 |
TEBOW,Tim | Florida | Quarterback | 6:02.6 | 245 | 4.68 |
AVERAGE | ย | ย | 6:03.4 | 228 | 4.75 |
ย | 2009 PASSING STATISTICS | ||||||||
PLAYER | GP | ATT | COMP | PCT | YARDS | TD | INT | G/AVG | PE |
BRADFORD | 01 | ย ย 14 | ย ย ย ย 10 | 71.43 | ย ย ย ย ย 096 | ย 1 | ย 0 | ย 96.00 | 152.60 |
LeFEVOUR | 02 | ย ย 77 | ย ย ย ย 51 | 66.23 | ย ย ย ย ย 436 | ย 3 | ย 2 | 218.00 | 121.46 |
McCOY | 02 | ย ย 76 | ย ย ย ย 51 | 67.11 | ย ย ย ย ย 654 | ย 5 | ย 2 | 327.00 | 155.84 |
PIKE | 02 | ย ย 71 | ย ย ย ย 50 | 70.42 | ย ย ย ย ย 591 | ย 6 | ย 1 | 295.50 | 195.52 |
TEBOW | 02 | ย ย 39 | ย ย ย ย 25 | 64.10 | ย ย ย ย ย 425 | ย 5 | ย 0 | 212.50 | 197.95 |
AVERAGE | ย | 55.4 | ย 37.4 | 67.51 | ย ย | 4.0 | 1.0 | 244.67 | 154.50 |
NOTE-GP indicates games played inโฆATT indicates pass attemptsโฆCOMP indicates pass completionsโฆ PCT indicates percentage of passes completedโฆG/AVG indicates average yards gained per gameโฆPE indicates passing efficiency rating.
ย | PASSING YARDAGE COMPARISON CHART | |||||||||||||
PLAYER | YD/A | RK | YD/C | RK | TD/A | RK | TD/C | RK | PCT | RK | PE | |||






.jpg?w=2560)
.jpg?w=2560)

.jpg?w=2560)

