Vancouver Canucks Trade: Why We Shouldn't be so Excited about David Booth Yet
It seems these days that some things never change in the NHL.
Rick DiPietro is on the Injured Reserve list once again on Long Island, as is Tim Connolly, even though heโs now in Toronto.
In Vancouver, both Roberto Luongo and the rest of the Canucks got off to a mediocre start, and their management has made another trade with the Florida Panthers. Some things never change.
TOP NEWS

Mark Scheifele Landing Spots ๐

Trade Block Big Board for October

Ranking Top 10 NCAA Men's Hockey Players for 2026-27 Season
However, this particular Canucks and Panthers swap is a bit surprising because it happened so early in the season. In case you need a refresher, let me feed you the contents of the deal:
To Vancouver: David Booth, Steven Reinprecht, a third-round draft pick in 2013
To Florida: Mikael Samuelsson, Marco Sturm
Now, if we eliminate the side dishes, weโre getting rid of Sturm, Reinprecht and the draft pick.
Sturm showed little in the way of promise with the Canucks, albeit in only the firstย six games, and was likely on his way to the press box or the waiver wire if he remained in Vancouver for much longer.
Reinprecht is what the Canucks get to even out the Sturm salary. The only difference is heโs already cleared waivers and is in the minors, which is where heโll stay with the Canucks organization for the immediate future.
In other words, weโll forget about both of these players, call it a wash and move on to the main course of Booth for Samuelsson.
On the surface, both players have produced very similar stats over the past few seasons. However, if youโd rather use Twitter as the immediate judge of who won this deal, it looks as though the Canucks have the edge.
At the very least, you can be certain the approval rating for Mike Gillis in Canucks nation is much higher than the approval rating for Roberto Luongo.
It seems as though Gillis can do no wrong among the vast majority of Canucks fans. He seems to have earned their trust with his calm confidence as well as the teamโs success on the ice since he took over as GM.
That and the fact that he dealt away a player who many were not that enamoured with in Samuelsson created an extremely positive vibe in Vancouver on Saturday. Not that the overtime victory over the Minnesota Wild earlier in the day didnโt help.
However, the increasingly impervious attitude towards Samuelsson as a Canuck is just as mystifying as those who are beaming with excitement over the acquisition of Booth.
Whether you agree with it or not, Mikael Samuelsson is a top-six forward on any NHL team. Yes, he lacks the breakaway speed or fierce tenacity that the casual fan notices, but he still puts up solid numbers and was actually the Canucks' best player in the entire 2010 playoffs.
Then again, maybe Canucks fans became accustomed to success without Samuelsson after the team didnโt miss a beat during their run to the Stanley Cup Finals when he injured himself.
Or it could be the number of people who were fed up with Coach Alain Vigneaultโs decision to have him manning the point on the first power play unit instead of Sami Salo. Either way, heโs gone and will play out the last year of his contract in Florida.
Speaking of contracts, David Boothโs can be looked at from two completely different perspectives. The optimist would rave about a top-six winger who is only three seasons removed from scoring 31 goals and is eight years younger than Samuelsson. Heโs also under contract until 2015!
The skeptic would point out that he only produced 40 points last season and hasnโt been as effective since his concussion that caused him to miss 54 games as a result of a massive hit delivered by Mike Richards in 2009. Heโs also under contract until 2015.
Did I mention that his cap hit is $4.25 million? Did I mention that Keith Ballard is under contract until 2015 as well and has a $4.2 million cap hit?
This is the same Keith Ballard whom the Canucks acquired from the same Florida Panthers team last summer.
Now, this may not be a fair comparison, because Ballard has looked much better so far this season and we have no idea how Booth will turn out, but their contracts and the way the Canucks acquired them are eerily similar.
Whatโs also eerie is how little we know about David Booth since we rarely get a chance to see any Panthers games here in Vancouver. Chris Higgins, who played with Booth in Florida, thinks heโll be a good fit.
However, will he thrive while playing with a more talented center in Ryan Kesler? Or will he struggle to adapt to the changes of playing for a contender in a hockey-mad market like Vancouver?
We can only hope heโll provide the same offense for the Canucks that he provided the Panthers with before his 2009 concussion. Otherwise, his contract could cause some serious problems down the road.
In other words, this trade is a case of high risk vs. high reward. The reward is in Boothโs youth and his upside being far greater than Mikael Samuelssonโs. The risk comes with his contract along with his up-and-down career to date.
This shouldnโt make you nervous, though. I just think you might also want to take Larry Davidโs adviceย and โCurb Your Enthusiasmโ a little when it comes to David Booth, at least for now.
This article also appears on Bottom Line Hockey
Follow me on Twitter: @adam_graham


.jpg?w=2560)
.jpg?w=2560)
.jpg?w=2560)
.jpg?w=2560)





