WWE: Why Re-Signing Kevin Nash and Booker T Is Smart

As fellow Bleacher Report writer Joe M. wrote, it has been reported that Kevin Nash and Booker T have re-signed with the WWE. Click here to read more, I'll warn you it does involve *SPOILERS.*

Most people hate this move, but not me.

First of all, TNA is now screwed. The "they" was supposed to be a reunited Main Event Mafia, and without Nash and Booker T, the only available former Mafia member is Sting. If TNA chooses to go with Steiner and Sting as "they," it would look awful. 

Now to the WWE; if this turns out to be longer than one night only, it gives the WWE some much needed established talent. Lately, they've been struggling with having almost exclusively young talent.

They now bring in guys that don't have to be built up, just reintroduced. Will reintroducing be an issue with the younger fan base? Probably, but that's an easy fix.

It adds fresh blood to the roster and gives them many new options for feuds. It's been a while since both Booker and Nash have been in the WWE, so the roster has changed drastically.

In Nash's case, he left in 2003. If you want an idea of the turnover on the roster, go look at the WWE roster from 2003. 

Both of these guys can have fresh feuds with younger talent and put guys over. I'm not implying they should be jobbers, but you can find a nice mix.  I'm not sure if egos will get in the way of that, I guess we'll have to wait and see.  

What are your thoughts on the WWE bringing back Kevin Nash and Booker T? Good move or bad move? Thanks for reading!

Like my writing? Now you can check out my brand new blog, Sports 24/7. Soon, this site will have many articles I don't publish on Bleacher Report. It's a work in a progress, so if it doesn't satisfy you yet, there will be more to come!