Why the Connecticut Huskies Are Bad for Women's Basketball
As Geno Auriemmaโs Connecticut Huskies rebounded from a dismalโand quite shockingโfirst half against the Stanford Cardinal to win the National Championship for the second straight year, one thought crossed my mind.
This is horrible for womenโs collegiate basketball.
Now, Iโm not taking away any of the accomplishments by this Huskies team. A 78-game winning streak is putting them into UCLA-Wooden territory, and consecutive National Championships is something not many programsโboth professional and collegiateโcan say they have done.
But look at the big picture.
As the Huskies have dominated womenโs hoops for over two years, they have left everybody in the dust. Even Hall of Fame coach Pat Summittโs Tennessee Volunteers are being swept away into the background.
TOP NEWS

Only 2 Players Left from Russ' Draft Class

Bob Iger Talks Lakers Purchase

Most Expensive Team Sales Ever ๐ค
Itโs not the Huskies fault they have such great coaching, recruit the top players in America (Maya Moore, anyone?), and know how to win when it matters most.
Itโs the fault of every other coach and program.
When Connecticut is beating teams by 40 or 50 points in the NCAA tournament, one has to wonder whether parity has become a complete afterthought and having one dominant team is the way the NCAA wants outsiders to envision the womenโs game.
Even after scoring 12 points in the first half of the national title game, with all the records and streaks and championships on the line, the Huskies thwarted the Cardinal and still won by a rather loose margin.
Goodbye Cinderella, hello domination.
Imagine if this was the case in the menโs game. It would be shocking, first of all, but it would also make many fans and analysts question the talent level of NCAA basketball players.
The Florida Gators were the last menโs team to win back-to-back championships in menโs hoops, becoming victorious in 2006 and 2007 behind three starters who would eventually become NBA first-round picks. It happens so rarely because the teams are so even across the board.
Thereโs no real explanation as to how Northern Iowa defeated Kansas or why Saint Maryโs handily defeated Villanova in this yearโs tournament. The better team won on that given day. Northern Iowa and Saint Maryโs are small programs but still know how to win games and play solid team basketball.
Could you imagine Butlerโor any other small mid-majorโdefeating Connecticut in a big game that mattered, let alone a game that really meant nothing to begin with?
When Wooden and his UCLA Bruins were winning game after game, it was a different era. It didnโt hurt that they had two of the best players who ever lived in Lew Alcindor (now Kareem Abdul-Jabbar) and Bill Walton.
There also was a lack of strong competition, at least to what you see in todayโs game.
In a sport in which many root for the underdog, the Huskies donโt even give them a crying chance. Whether that hurts the credibility of their sport is a question worth thinking about.

.jpg?w=2560)
.jpg?w=2560)
.jpg?w=2560)


_0.jpg?w=2560)